New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Buttigieg calls for ban on all voter ID laws.

FakeName

Governor
LOL What "WE" got, pilgrim :)

And since he was exonerated by the Mueller report, I'm seeing sour grapes here
He wasnt exonerated by the mueller report.

You have been lied to. Mueller specifically says it does not exonerate him. It lays out four hundred pages of evidence against him.

You really should read it.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
The definitions I provided were current. Just a fact.

You should read your wiki link. It doesnt say what you want it to.

You ask "How would you characterize the growing tendency by our democratic "friends" to embrace constant war and authoritarian tactics (such as censorship)?"

I would catagorize that is totally made up BS. Made up right wing propaganda. There simply is no such tendency in the Democratic party. Come back yo the real world.
I did read it. And I would simply note that you didn't supply the part that you think I didn't read. What do you think I think it says?

Is this one of yours?

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of radical right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

Take out the "radical right-wing" and I'd say that pretty accurately describes the current "progressive" movement.

“Every age has its own fascism” – Primo Levi

Modern progressivism is post-modernist fascism, our current age's "own fascism." Clearly the left is more authoritarian than the right. Big government is the essence of "authoritarianism." If the whole "anyone who doesn't support impeaching Trump is Putin's puppet" nonsense isn't "authoritarian nationalism" I don't know what else you would call it. "Dictatorial power?" How about the whole effort to do away with the Electoral College and all voter ID laws? That is clearly designed to implement a "dictatorship of the proletariat." No one for a minute believes it holds anything but the prospect of a permanent democratic majority (rule) that will run roughshod over the rights of the minority in implementing it's social and economic "justice" agenda. Forceable suppression of opposition? What would you call the whole organized effort to lock Trump up without a scintilla of evidence of any crimes? The vile personal attacks on his administration staffers? Or the efforts to paint anyone who questions global warming as "anti-science" despite the growing evidence that the whole thing is at best grotesquely exaggerated and at worst a complete hoax? And strong regimentation of society - hello, PC uber alles ring any bells? And the economy - what else would you call the Democrats' current platform planks that would both clamp down even more government control over businesses and, in effect, criminalize many business practices? If the shoe fits...
 

EatTheRich

President
The fact that she was under investigation for mishandling classified information, as confirmed by Comey, which itself is a prosecutable offence, should have given them all they needed.

Comey had Hillary's exoneration statement written up before they even interviewed her. For you to claim this is somehow NOT a double standard adds a new heightened level to partisan blindness.
Doing it inadvertently is not a prosecutable offense. To be prosecutable, intent or gross negligence is required.
 

EatTheRich

President
MY double standard? OMG HAHAHA!!!!

How many Clinton associates during the investigation ended up in solitary or got raided at 6 in the morning?

It was a white wash from the moment it started. EVERYONE they interviewed was given immunity from prosecution. Double standard doesn't even start to cover it.
Given immunity in exchange for saying anything potentially incriminating about Clinton they could.
 

EatTheRich

President
Nope. What he said was that she was irresponsible but not criminal. None of it was marked classified at the tine it was sent. Which means there was no criminal responsibility on Clinton's part.

On the other hand there was to s of evidence against trump and his people. Read the mueller reporr.
There were 3 emails that were confidential when sent, including 1 marked as such. Mistakes happen.
 

EatTheRich

President
I did read it. And I would simply note that you didn't supply the part that you think I didn't read. What do you think I think it says?

Is this one of yours?

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of radical right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

Take out the "radical right-wing" and I'd say that pretty accurately describes the current "progressive" movement.

“Every age has its own fascism” – Primo Levi

Modern progressivism is post-modernist fascism, our current age's "own fascism." Clearly the left is more authoritarian than the right. Big government is the essence of "authoritarianism." If the whole "anyone who doesn't support impeaching Trump is Putin's puppet" nonsense isn't "authoritarian nationalism" I don't know what else you would call it. "Dictatorial power?" How about the whole effort to do away with the Electoral College and all voter ID laws? That is clearly designed to implement a "dictatorship of the proletariat." No one for a minute believes it holds anything but the prospect of a permanent democratic majority (rule) that will run roughshod over the rights of the minority in implementing it's social and economic "justice" agenda. Forceable suppression of opposition? What would you call the whole organized effort to lock Trump up without a scintilla of evidence of any crimes? The vile personal attacks on his administration staffers? Or the efforts to paint anyone who questions global warming as "anti-science" despite the growing evidence that the whole thing is at best grotesquely exaggerated and at worst a complete hoax? And strong regimentation of society - hello, PC uber alles ring any bells? And the economy - what else would you call the Democrats' current platform planks that would both clamp down even more government control over businesses and, in effect, criminalize many business practices? If the shoe fits...
“Big government”=the Wall and the military detention centers, regulation of women’s uteruses, use of government to punish opposition media.

Doing away with the Electoral College and voter ID=returning power to the people from an unrepresentative elite.

Democrats=capitalist political party
 

FakeName

Governor
I did read it. And I would simply note that you didn't supply the part that you think I didn't read. What do you think I think it says?

Is this one of yours?

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of radical right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

Take out the "radical right-wing" and I'd say that pretty accurately describes the current "progressive" movement.



..
You are joking right?
.
None of that describes the current progressive movement. Not even remotely close.

Right wingers are the nationalists, not progressives.

Right wingers want a regimented society not progressives. Progressives want the opposite. Multi culturalism, de criminalizing drugs, legalizing gay marriage, etc. In short a "de-regimentation" of society. Etc.

Etc. Etc.

Sure progressives would regulate the economy and protect the environment more then right wingers but that does not make them fascist
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
No, it wouldn’t. Congress has power under the 15th Amendment to regulate state elections to prevent racial disfranchisement.
Wrong, the constitution says only citizens can vote. *Edited*
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EatTheRich

President
Wrong, the constitution says only citizens can vote. Try again kiddy

Do you still believe that 100f is 1/6 hotter than 33f
Where in the Constitution does it say only citizens can vote, and, if that is the case, why were aliens allowed to vote in 10 of the original 13 states at the time the Constitution was adopted?
 
Top