New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Supreme Court tosses ruling against bakers who refused cake for gay couple

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-tosses-ruling-against-bakers-who-refused-cake-for-gay-couple

The Supreme Court on Monday threw out a ruling against two Oregon bakers who refused to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple.

The couple, Melissa and Aaron Klein, cited religious beliefs as their reason for not providing services for a gay wedding. This touched off the latest in a series of such cases making headlines in recent years. During the court's last term, justices ruled in favor of a Colorado baker in a similar situation, stating that a state body demonstrated improper hostility toward the baker's religion in finding that he violated a state anti-discrimination law.

On Monday, the Supreme Court sent the Klein case back down to a lower court "for further consideration in light of" their Colorado decision.

The Kleins' case arose when Rachel Bowman-Cryer went to them in January 2013 to see about a wedding cake. When Aaron Klein asked for information, including the name of the groom, she told him there was none. Klein then said the bakery does not make cakes for gay weddings, court documents said.

Bowman-Cryer's mother, who was with her, said Klein quoted the Bible when explaining his decision.

The Kleins had to pay a $135,000 judgment to the couple for discriminating against them in violation of a state public accommodations statute. They ended up closing down their bakery.

The couple is represented by First Liberty, who celebrated the Supreme Court's decision as a win.

"This is a victory for Aaron and Melissa Klein and for religious liberty for all Americans," First Liberty president Kelly Shackelford said in a statement. "The Constitution protects speech, popular or not, from condemnation by the government. The message from the Court is clear, government hostility toward religious Americans will not be tolerated."

_______________________________

Since the case has been thrown out, I wonder if they get their $135,000 back (assuming it was actually paid at this stage)?
 
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-tosses-ruling-against-bakers-who-refused-cake-for-gay-couple

The Supreme Court on Monday threw out a ruling against two Oregon bakers who refused to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple.

The couple, Melissa and Aaron Klein, cited religious beliefs as their reason for not providing services for a gay wedding. This touched off the latest in a series of such cases making headlines in recent years. During the court's last term, justices ruled in favor of a Colorado baker in a similar situation, stating that a state body demonstrated improper hostility toward the baker's religion in finding that he violated a state anti-discrimination law.

On Monday, the Supreme Court sent the Klein case back down to a lower court "for further consideration in light of" their Colorado decision.

The Kleins' case arose when Rachel Bowman-Cryer went to them in January 2013 to see about a wedding cake. When Aaron Klein asked for information, including the name of the groom, she told him there was none. Klein then said the bakery does not make cakes for gay weddings, court documents said.

Bowman-Cryer's mother, who was with her, said Klein quoted the Bible when explaining his decision.

The Kleins had to pay a $135,000 judgment to the couple for discriminating against them in violation of a state public accommodations statute. They ended up closing down their bakery.

The couple is represented by First Liberty, who celebrated the Supreme Court's decision as a win.

"This is a victory for Aaron and Melissa Klein and for religious liberty for all Americans," First Liberty president Kelly Shackelford said in a statement. "The Constitution protects speech, popular or not, from condemnation by the government. The message from the Court is clear, government hostility toward religious Americans will not be tolerated."

_______________________________

Since the case has been thrown out, I wonder if they get their $135,000 back (assuming it was actually paid at this stage)?
Opportunistic Monopolization

Gayism is not a religious issue, any more than most of the Commandments are strictly for the religious to pay attention to. It is all about the health and future of civic society. If our only protection from this social disease is the First Amendment, we can expect a degenerate and confused social order to follow this aggressive minimization of it.
 
Opportunistic Monopolization

Gayism is not a religious issue, any more than most of the Commandments are strictly for the religious to pay attention to. It is all about the health and future of civic society. If our only protection from this social disease is the First Amendment, we can expect a degenerate and confused social order to follow this aggressive minimization of it.
what???
 

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
i'm actually with you on this one. I have no clue what he just said :)
people can rate posts anythign they like. But I find it odd that you can rate a post 'DISAGREE' when someone is stating they don't understand something. Are you just being stupid, petty, or do you think I actually understood, but lied?
 
Top