New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Jerry Nadler steps in it again at his own hearing.

EatTheRich

President
Yes, we already know Nadler didn't even have the referenced material. That's precisely the point.
He knew what it said, though. Lewandowski could have scanned the page and found the assertion. But he chose instead to contemptuously ask for irrelevant information.

If Nadler had been able to furnish the paragraph and read the allegation verbatim from the report, Lewandowski would have demanded that Nadler tell him what color tie Mueller was wearing when his team finalized the report.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
He knew what it said, though. Lewandowski could have scanned the page and found the assertion. But he chose instead to contemptuously ask for irrelevant information.

If Nadler had been able to furnish the paragraph and read the allegation verbatim from the report, Lewandowski would have demanded that Nadler tell him what color tie Mueller was wearing when his team finalized the report.
Sorry, the cat's out of the bag. Today was yet another humiliating loss for DemocRATS. Even fellow liberals have said as much. You should probably do some reading and catch up on things.
 

EatTheRich

President
Sorry, the cat's out of the bag. Today was yet another humiliating loss for DemocRATS. Even fellow liberals have said as much. You should probably do some reading and catch up on things.
Just don’t start hurting people when this doesn’t go the way you think it’s going.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Just don’t start hurting people when this doesn’t go the way you think it’s going.
Other than the beat downs I give liberals all over the internet, I never hurt anyone. But feel free to make your prediction.

I predict nothing will happen and the status quo will continue across the board.
 

EatTheRich

President
Other than the beat downs I give liberals all over the internet, I never hurt anyone. But feel free to make your prediction.

I predict nothing will happen and the status quo will continue across the board.
When people voted for Trump, it was because they wanted change. Now, your “prediction” is Trump supporters’ best-case scenario.
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
He knew what he was asking a question about, just not the exact wording (since he didn’t have the report in front of him):

“Is it correct that as reported in the Mueller report on June 19, 2017, you met alone in the Oval Office with the president?” Nadler asked.

Lewandowski replied: “Is there a book and page number you can reference to? I don’t have a copy of the report in front of me.”

Nadler knew this much, answering: “Volume 2, page 90. I simply asked you is it correct that as reported in the Mueller report [that] on June 19, 2017 you met alone in the Oval Office with the president?”

Lewandowski responded: “Could you read the exact language of the report, sir? I don’t have it available to me.”

Nadler: “I don’t think I need to do that and I have limited time. Did you meet with the president on that date?”

Lewandowski: “Congressman, I’d like for you to refresh my memory by providing a copy of the report so I can follow along.”

Nadler stopped the clock for the hearing while staffers gave Lewandowski a book. Nadler against referred to volume 2, page 90.

Lewandowski: “Which paragraph, sir?”

Nadler: “I don’t have it in front of me.”

Eventually, the committee chairman asked: “How many times did the president ask you to meet him in the White House?”

Lewandowski said: “The White House has directed me not to disclose the substance of any discussions.”
What does your post have to do with Nadler not having the nads to bring the paragraph?

Whale poo...Lol!
 

EatTheRich

President
What does your post have to do with Nadler not having the nads to bring the paragraph?

Whale poo...Lol!
The only thing Nadler didn’t have was a physical copy of the report in front of him. So what? Does that change what the report said about Trump’s obstruction of justice?
 

FakeName

Governor
Trump isn't the topic, so there's that.

Believe it or not, there's a whole world out there that doesn't involve Donald J. Trump.
Nadler's weight isn't the topic either.

Fans of fat politicians shouldn't make silly jokes about other politicians being fat.
 

Nostra

Governor
Fact: the Mueller report said that Lewandowski met alone with Trump in the Oval Office on June 19, 2017. Lewandowski refused to address the claim because Nadler was only able to provide the page of the report on which it was made, and not the paragraph.
Yes, and?
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
He knew what it said, though. Lewandowski could have scanned the page and found the assertion. But he chose instead to contemptuously ask for irrelevant information.

If Nadler had been able to furnish the paragraph and read the allegation verbatim from the report, Lewandowski would have demanded that Nadler tell him what color tie Mueller was wearing when his team finalized the report.
Why should Lewandowski do them any favors? They called him. They should provide referenced material.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Nadler's weight isn't the topic either.

Fans of fat politicians shouldn't make silly jokes about other politicians being fat.
Nadler led the hearing, so he's open game. Nice try.
 
Lewandowski confirmed nothing that wasn't already in the Muehler report.

Prepare yourself for another disappointing NOTHINGBURGER.:D
Article one of impeachment confirmed ... that's a "nothingburger"?!

Lets do the impeachment thingy RIGHT before the KGOP convention, give MAGA Cultist a chance to throw their Lord and Savior to the wolves no?

tia
 

Nostra

Governor
The only failure on Nadler’s part was failure to anticipate what a slime Lewandowski would be. Lewandowski meanwhile committed contempt of Congress to protect Trump.
Asking Nadler to show him what his question is based on makes him a slime?

Shouldn’t the Chair of the committee know what he is asking? Seems reasonable to me.

Where are the contempt charges?
 
Top