New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

New/Updated Rules as a result of our Chat with the PJ users (EVERYONE READ)

Status
Not open for further replies.

bdtex

Administrator
Staff member
no problem...
we can accommadate their wittle feelings...
let's just ban all the regulars for being stupid enough to enter debate with them.

problem solved?
You're looking for a way to violate the spirit of the rule,without it being a technical violation.
 

Days

Commentator
You're looking for a way to violate the spirit of the rule,without it being a technical violation.
Actually, I'm questioning the spirit of the rule.

Once upon a time we all lived in the wild west and whoever had the fastest draw was the winner. We came to Political Jack and tried to build a forum that was civilized, but then struggled with the concept of civility.

I'm a preacher, I've struggled with the spirit of the rule far beyond what is practical for daily posting. And yet, I have a hard time drawing the line between debate and insults... when you attack my argument, are you not - by extension - attacking me? Especially in an online forum where my whole presence is limited to my argument?

And if we can not attack the opposing argument, how can we debate?
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
Actually, I'm questioning the spirit of the rule.

Once upon a time we all lived in the wild west and whoever had the fastest draw was the winner. We came to Political Jack and tried to build a forum that was civilized, but then struggled with the concept of civility.

I'm a preacher, I've struggled with the spirit of the rule far beyond what is practical for daily posting. And yet, I have a hard time drawing the line between debate and insults... when you attack my argument, are you not - by extension - attacking me? Especially in an online forum where my whole presence is limited to my argument?

And if we can not attack the opposing argument, how can we debate?
I would simply suggest what you mentioned earlier in this thread - referencing an argument or concept as "stupid" rather than its author. I just had a post deleted (today) in which I noted that this board's most consistent sycophant is calling Trump supporters sycophants. In retrospect, I should have noted that the person whose posts in this forum are the most consistently "sycophantic" is calling Trump supporters sycophants.

Semantics, I know...but that's the world today I guess. Kinda like how saying "people of color" is - for some reason - ok...but "colored people" is not. Not that I use either of those terms, but that example starkly demonstrates the linguistic hoop-jumping that is now required in this world of ours. :confused:

The things we do to assuage folks...
 

Days

Commentator
I would simply suggest what you mentioned earlier in this thread - referencing an argument or concept as "stupid" rather than its author. I just had a post deleted (today) in which I noted that this board's most consistent sycophant is calling Trump supporters sycophants. In retrospect, I should have noted that the person whose posts in this forum are the most consistently "sycophantic" is calling Trump supporters sycophants.

Semantics, I know...but that's the world today I guess. Kinda like how saying "people of color" is - for some reason - ok...but "colored people" is not. Not that I use either of those terms, but that example starkly demonstrates the linguistic hoop-jumping that is now required in this world of ours. :confused:

The things we do to assuage folks...
.... and hey, if it will work, whatever works.

But my experience has been that the mods are so overworked, they don't even notice that I attacked the post, not the poster. They see the word "stupid" and I get banned... end of story.

This is why I said I am questioning the spirit of the rule...
what are we trying to do here? eliminate debate?

Ridge Runner is on record in this thread saying he simply flat out quit coming here because, we are a bunch of crybabies. What he is saying is simple: you can't debate in this forum anymore, it offends the posters, and now it is against the rules... so why come here?

The crazy part is... we all know that the crocodile tears are so fake anyway.
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
.... and hey, if it will work, whatever works.

But my experience has been that the mods are so overworked, they don't even notice that I attacked the post, not the poster. They see the word "stupid" and I get banned... end of story.

This is why I said I am questioning the spirit of the rule...
what are we trying to do here? eliminate debate?

Ridge Runner is on record in this thread saying he simply flat out quit coming here because, we are a bunch of crybabies. What he is saying is simple: you can't debate in this forum anymore, it offends the posters, and now it is against the rules... so why come here?

The crazy part is... we all know that the crocodile tears are so fake anyway.
My take away is that PJ has become an unmanageable 'complaint factory' and the mods are saddled with reports from a ridiculous onslaught of whiners and moaners. Folks have been slamming the "report" button over every real or imagined slight.

Personally, I can't - for the life of me - understand how anyone gets so invested into ANY online forum to the point of "reporting" others rather than simply addressing them directly...but then I wasn't raised by loons to have a thin-skinned sense of entitlement.

This forum needs a "binky"/pacifier icon.

Whatever - I'm just going with the flow. If it were my domain, I'd tell the tattling hordes to sack up. However, I am merely a guest here. :)
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
PLEASE RESPOND IN THIS THREAD THAT YOU HAVE READ THE RULES. THANK YOU!

New/Updated Rules as a result of our Chat with the PJ users:
1) Calling someone a racist is an automatic 3 day temp ban and will be deleted.

2) Posting grotesque pictures or nudity is against the advertising terms so those are an automatic 3 day ban and have to be deleted.

3) On your first violation after today (10/10/2019) on new content you will be pm'd by me and we will discuss whether or not you want to continue to post here at PJ.

4) Posting any personal threats or personal information about another user is a permanent ban and a review to see if your account will be deleted.

5) If a user pm's me a picture of their alerts and its full of one person down rating a bunch of their posts then the ratings abuser will lose the ratings buttons.

6) Name calling is something people resort to when they have lost the debate. Name Calling is reportable and we will track who generates name call reports and decide on how long the worst abusers will be banned.

7) Users that make reports that are not violations or abuse the report feature will have it removed.

8) Thread derailment is no longer reportable. If you constantly derail threads or avoid a topic you will be thread banned with possible further punishment.


The moderators moderate all users the same, but they are like policemen in that with over 700 posts a day average you may do a violation and it goes unnoticed. You may do one violation in 100 days and it gets caught? If you do the crime you do the time. Don't go and cry to your base of friends that you got caught and someone else didn't and don't cry to them that you get treated differently. You don't know who gets banned and for what or how often. Its just like a speeding ticket. The guy that speeds once a year could get caught. The guy that speeds every day might not. Luck of the draw.

Accept the punishment and move on. It isn't a big deal.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These Old Rules still apply:

"Signatures must not be poster quotes of any type."

RACIAL, ETHNIC, HOMOPHOBIC, GENDER, OR RELIGIOUS SLURS
Action will be taken regarding any post or image that is deemed by moderators to be slurs against groups of people."

ATTACKING OR CALLING OUT STAFF OR ADMINISTRATION

Moderators and Administrators, are volunteers who work hard to make the site as welcoming as possible.
Their duties do not include reading every post.
Your reporting of rule-breaking posts is welcome.

***Moderator Actions - Report any concerns over moderator actions in a PM to SW48.
Do Not make disrespectful posts about moderator action on the board.
Use the report feature."

PROFANITY..."
Posts, signatures, images, and links of this nature are forbidden

AVATARS

Avatars and profile pictures are governed by the same rules regarding other content - images that are obscene, insulting to any individual or group are not allowed and are subject to infraction.


SIGNATURES

Signatures must comply with all applicable forum rules, especially those on 'Flame/baiting' and 'Personal Attacks'. The use of quotations from other members in a signature is subject to the express consent of the member being quoted. Signatures should not contain more than one link, and links should not be primarily intended to advertise or sell any product, service or other forum.

MULTIPLE USER ACCOUNTS

"Sock puppets" - Multiple user accounts are not allowed. The use of anonymous proxy IP addresses and systems, which are often used to hide identities for the purposes of creating multiple accounts, is also prohibited. Usage of these tools can lead to immediate and permanent banning.

LINKS, ADVERTISING, IMPROPER QUOTING, AND COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS

Links in posts must be relevant to the discussion, and must not be intended simply to direct members to another website.

All quotes from other sources must be given appropriate credit, preferably with a link to the original article - long articles should be quoted from and/or summarized, not quoted in their entirety. Content copied from other sources must meet "fair use" guidelines, and violations of copyright will be deleted and subject to infraction. When quoting other posters, we ask that you use the site's "quote" function, so that other members can backtrack the conversation if they wish."
Acknowledged. Thanks.
 

Days

Commentator
My take away is that PJ has become an unmanageable 'complaint factory' and the mods are saddled with reports from a ridiculous onslaught of whiners and moaners. Folks have been slamming the "report" button over every real or imagined slight.

Personally, I can't - for the life of me - understand how anyone gets so invested into ANY online forum to the point of "reporting" others rather than simply addressing them directly...but then I wasn't raised by loons to have a thin-skinned sense of entitlement.

This forum needs a "binky"/pacifier icon.

Whatever - I'm just going with the flow. If it were my domain, I'd tell the tattling hordes to sack up. However, I am merely a guest here. :)
What's going on is obvious. We are the victim of the political strategy of our political parties. And we are not alone. It is a macro strategy. This stupidity is playing out at every online political forum. It is in no way the fault of the mods, they are the victim the same as you and I. There is no solution; if we came up with a solution, the strategy would shift to address our solution; and the political parties are run by think tanks; people with doctorates in poly sci.

The strategy keeps crashing into our boards like waves attacking a beach. Gives new meaning to surfing the net. I just hope that our admin is able to adapt to the game as fast as they are tossing it at him. A lot of forums are being crashed by this strategy, they want to turn over the politics, keep people from thinking too much. Forums like this one are a problem: too much thinking going on here. How much is too much? Any thinking at all is too much.
 
Last edited:

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
What's going on is obvious. We are the victim of the political strategy of our political parties. And we are not alone. It is a macro strategy. This stupidity is playing out at every online political forum. It is in no way the fault of the mods, they are the victim the same as you and I. There is no solution; if we came up with a solution, the strategy would shift to address our solution; and the political parties are run by think tanks; people with doctorates in poly sci.

The strategy keeps crashing into our boards like waves attacking a beach. Gives new meaning to surfing the net. I just hope that our admin is able to adapt to the game as fast as they are tossing it at him. A lot of forums are being crashed by this strategy, they want to turn over the politics, keep people from thinking too much. Forums like these are a problem: too much thinking going on here. How much is too much? Any thinking at all is too much.

Huh? Not at all. No personal attacks, no threats no problems. Not many thinkers here..
 

Days

Commentator
Huh? Not at all. No personal attacks, no threats no problems. Not many thinkers here..
the composite reporting represents an attack on the forum. You are being overwhelmed... on purpose. The political parties want to crash your admin infrastructure; overload it until it can not handle the forum. The goal is simple: tear apart any logical sequence of posting. That's why they removed the thread-view from all posting software. That's why they shut down the fray. It is political strategy... in a brave new online world.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Sure.

But is it really a point that needs clarifying, or is it a point just to be a pain in the ass, or is it something else? seems to me people want to know the difference between calling someone stupid and something stupid.

My answer here is stupid. Did I just insult myself?
Consider yourself on report.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
the composite reporting represents an attack on the forum. You are being overwhelmed... on purpose. The political parties want to crash your admin infrastructure; overload it until it can not handle the forum. The goal is simple: tear apart any logical sequence of posting. That's why they removed the thread-view from all posting software. That's why they shut down the fray. It is political strategy... in a brave new online world.

Hmm..

No. It's maybe 5 posters that constitute the bulk of nonsense
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top