New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

New/Updated Rules as a result of our Chat with the PJ users (EVERYONE READ)

Status
Not open for further replies.

FakeName

Governor
I was at the store the other day buying some condoms and the cashier said "do you wan't a bag with that?"

I said "Dude she's not that ugly!".
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Thanks. I also see SW48 answered me and stated that things are not going good.
Everyone saw that, BC, so don't let it go to your head. I know this is a big moment for you, getting a response from the great pumpkin but I doubt it's the beginning of a lifelong relationship.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
(6) Name calling...……….."Trump sycophant/s" =fawning parasite

Will that be included with "stupid"...…………...that's not allowed now?
 

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
So are reports down since the meeting?

There’s been very little follow-up from the meeting.
 

Jen

Senator
So, consider this forum lucky, as we seem to be somewhat insulated from what has been political policy for the two major political parties over the past decade.
But I guarantee that the nonsense being generated by those 5 posters is in direct correlation with marching orders from the political party behind their posting.

*disclaimer:
my guarantees aren't worth two cents, but they sound good, don't they?
All it takes is a few posters to ruin an entire board. Recently some of those kinds of posters have found this board. Ideally, the posters would come in line with the tone of the board. That hasn't happened yet. It's not ever good to just rampantly ban trollish posters, but sometimes that has to be done or they will destroy a board.
 

Sunset Rose

Mayor
Supporting Member
All it takes is a few posters to ruin an entire board. Recently some of those kinds of posters have found this board. Ideally, the posters would come in line with the tone of the board. That hasn't happened yet. It's not ever good to just rampantly ban trollish posters, but sometimes that has to be done or they will destroy a board.
If PJ hasn't been destroyed by the negative posters who have been here for years, I'm not concerned about any newcomers. The new rules currently put in place should keep the board running smoothly. :)
 

Jets

Conservative Pragmatist
It’s fascinating that posters are so swept up in their ideology, that it’s necessary to aim flame throwers at one another...
 

Jen

Senator
If PJ hasn't been destroyed by the negative posters who have been here for years, I'm not concerned about any newcomers. The new rules currently put in place should keep the board running smoothly. :)
I didn't mention anything about "negative" posters. It's not "negative" posters that are destructive. We have plenty of those on both sides and the board is fine.

Trollish posting is destructive posting. It is purposely destructive posting. If the new rules are consistently enforced those should take care of trolls once and for all. If not, then we will still have problems. It's just that simple.:)

I'm not optimistic. Trolls cling like nits to hair........fleas in a rug........ they are almost impossible to get rid of.
 

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
There’s a fair amount of trolling from “veterans”, too. It just never went challenged.

I didn't mention anything about "negative" posters. It's not "negative" posters that are destructive. We have plenty of those on both sides and the board is fine.

Trollish posting is destructive posting. It is purposely destructive posting. If the new rules are consistently enforced those should take care of trolls once and for all. If not, then we will still have problems. It's just that simple.:)

I'm not optimistic. Trolls cling like nits to hair........fleas in a rug........ they are almost impossible to get rid of.
 

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
Zero input on what?

You two can't leave well enough alone.

?
You call a meeting and ask us all to participate and come up with ideas. Then give very little feedback on how it impacted the forum. It certainly isn’t that you’re doing anything wrong, nor am I the one that gets to decide that, but in my opinion, I believe it would be much more effective if there was follow-up and a dialogue that remained open.

Just my 2-cents I wasn’t asked to give.
 

Days

Commentator
You call a meeting and ask us all to participate and come up with ideas. Then give very little feedback on how it impacted the forum. It certainly isn’t that you’re doing anything wrong, nor am I the one that gets to decide that, but in my opinion, I believe it would be much more effective if there was follow-up and a dialogue that remained open.

Just my 2-cents I wasn’t asked to give.
I haven't been around enough to know, but wasn't these new rules the follow-up to your meeting?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top