Menu
New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Anyone Watching This Taylor Clown's Testimony????

  • Thread starter Deleted member 21794
  • Start date
PhilFish

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
NinaS said:
You claimed he was vindicated but the articles I sent you doesn’t sound like it. On the other hand, since he is associated with Trump he is as innocent as a newborn baby. Try reading the articles instead of giving some half assed answer. He isn’t being accused of molesting anyone, he’s just being accused of ignoring something that they said he knew about.
Click to expand...
Yikes. Yes.

Soooo guilty...
 
llovejim

llovejim

Current Champion
PhilFish said:
so far he's not offering much.


as far as your silliness, the sacreligious thing is a nice touch. king is a nice touch, but untrue. carry on with it, it it helps with whatever silly theme you have ongoing..
Click to expand...
unlike murder and bank robbery where there is physical evidence, like the gun used or the loot found or fingerprints at the scene or on the gun or the dead guy's blood on the accused shoes....bribery relies on circumstantial and first hand evidence of what was heard or observed, and second hand evidence of what was said if there is enough corroboration of that from the original source. unless trump was stupid enough to actually write down or say to anyone but the guys he has been keeping from testifying under oath- Mulvaney, Rudy, Pompeo, Munchkin - he was holding back the military aid to bribe Ukraine to do his political dirty work against biden, then we have to go by what he said in the phone call where he asked zelensky for a favor after talking about how much we have done for Ukraine, but it has not been reciprocal and he needs to ask a favor, though- let Rudy and AG Barr come down there, meet with him and his advisers, and let them help you find some dirt on the Bidens and prove the crazy ass theory about Crowdstrike, which trump heard about on Hannity and somehow believed.

It is all there, to anyone not trying to be blind to the facts. Taylor's testimony of what he heard and saw, of what Trump's hand picked flunkies also admitted, about rudy being the go to guy, as trump said in the phone call, and rudy told them in no uncertain terms the military aid and the visit to the White House depended on zelensky helping act like biden did something wrong in Ukraine that could help Trump in the election.

when enough people confirm what they heard, and saw, and even some text messages, and what Rudy has admitted and what Mulvaney admitted about a quid pro quo with the military aid, even the biggest chickenshit trump voter must know deep down inside how guilty trump is. but they are too dishonest and gutless to admit it.
 
middleview

middleview

President
Supporting Member
PhilFish

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
llovejim said:
unlike murder and bank robbery where there is physical evidence, like the gun used or the loot found or fingerprints at the scene or on the gun or the dead guy's blood on the accused shoes....bribery relies on circumstantial and first hand evidence of what was heard or observed, and second hand evidence of what was said if there is enough corroboration of that from the original source. unless trump was stupid enough to actually write down or say to anyone but the guys he has been keeping from testifying under oath- Mulvaney, Rudy, Pompeo, Munchkin - he was holding back the military aid to bribe Ukraine to do his political dirty work against biden, then we have to go by what he said in the phone call where he asked zelensky for a favor after talking about how much we have done for Ukraine, but it has not been reciprocal and he needs to ask a favor, though- let Rudy and AG Barr come down there, meet with him and his advisers, and let them help you find some dirt on the Bidens and prove the crazy ass theory about Crowdstrike, which trump heard about on Hannity and somehow believed.

It is all there, to anyone not trying to be blind to the facts. Taylor's testimony of what he heard and saw, of what Trump's hand picked flunkies also admitted, about rudy being the go to guy, as trump said in the phone call, and rudy told them in no uncertain terms the military aid and the visit to the White House depended on zelensky helping act like biden did something wrong in Ukraine that could help Trump in the election.

when enough people confirm what they heard, and saw, and even some text messages, and what Rudy has admitted and what Mulvaney admitted about a quid pro quo with the military aid, even the biggest chickenshit trump voter must know deep down inside how guilty trump is. but they are too dishonest and gutless to admit it.
Click to expand...
Exactly , 100%>

But no.
 
Caroljo

Caroljo

Senator
Gee, after reading all these posts, does anyone think that the Democrats are going to accept the results of this if it's found he did nothing to be impeached for? Tell us Lefty's, if he's found not guilty, will you accept the results? Or will you all spread more of your hate? When he's re-elected next November, will you accept those results? Because if you don't get him impeached, he WILL be your President again for 4 more years. Too bad you don't realize how stupid you all look to sane people and the rest of the world with all these investigations. You support a known liar to lead this (and you call Trump a liar! Lol!), which tells everyone what you're really like. You should be so proud. You'll never see the inside of the WH for years to come. It'll be awesome!!
 
NinaS

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
PhilFish said:
Yikes. Yes.

Soooo guilty...
Click to expand...
So why do you seem to think he didn’t know what was going on? Because he Says so? Pretty sad when you automatically believe a Trumpy no matter what the evidence says otherwise.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
llovejim said:
spamming the board with facts bothers cowardly gutless trump voters afraid of the facts. the quid pro quo is there, the do me a favor, the let my stooge rudy and my other stooge Barr come take over the investigation in your country and they will find some by god corruption that can help me win the next election.....and you call that spam.

wow. you really are ate up with the trump mania. the transcript just says Ukraine wanted to buy Javelin missiles, trump voter. that is not aid. got a link to trump giving them lethal weapons any more than what Obama did as Fox news noted here-

https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/money-to-ukraine

The Bush administration gave the least amount of aid to Ukraine, compared (so far) with the Trump administration and the Obama administration. During President George W. Bush’s eight years in office, from 2001 through 2008, the U.S. government provided about $1.1 billion to Ukraine, government figures reveal.

Congress almost doubled the amount of aid provided to Ukraine during President Barack Obama’s eight years in the White House, supplying $2.1 billion.

The amount began to spike in 2010 -- the same year that Ukraine held a presidential election. But the biggest jump came between 2015 and 2016. In 2015, the U.S. gave about $314 million to Ukraine; in 2016, that skyrocketed to $523 million, 63 percent of which went toward the military.

The increase came almost two years after an incredibly tumultuous year for Ukraine, which was thrust into a violent revolution in February 2014 when pro-European, anti-Russian protesters marched in the nation’s capital, Kiev, ultimately overthrowing the Ukrainian government and pro-Kremlin leader.

Less than one month later, the Russian military seized control of Crimea and, via a dubious referendum, annexed the peninsula.

Lawmakers approved another significant chunk of aid in 2017 -- the first year of Trump's term, giving Ukraine $446 million. In 2018, that slipped to $350 million.

trump decreased the aid Obama had his last year....and 63% of the larger amount Obama sent was military aid...so shut the hell up with your goddamn lies.
Click to expand...
Another useless copy and paste. Obama refused to give Ukraine lethal aid, even after Russia invaded them and took Crimea. Trump stepped in and has been giving the lethal aid for the past two years. Your Googling, copying and pasting does NOTHING to help your cause Now go sleep it off. And stop lying.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Spamature said:
You cons do here what they are doing there.
I was dead on right about the GOP trying to muddy the waters.
If Pelosi leaves of the much more clear simple and indisputable tax evasion charge from the Stormy Daniels payoff they public is not going to be able to follow the ball as the GOP attempt their clumsy, disjointed, and beside the point, Globetrotter shuffle of irrelevant details.

It is much easier to understand that he paid off a hooker and then lied about it to the IRS in order deduct the cost of his hush money payment as consulting fees to Cohen, and he committed this crime from behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office as President of the United States.

Instead of diplomats and their opinions based upon observation, they would have clear paper trail with Trump signatures all over it, and seasoned criminal prosecutors as witnesses against him. Also Trump would have no power to block state officials from testifying like he does with federal officials.
Click to expand...
That's the most bizarre way of saying you realize today was a flop for DemocRATS. But I'll take it and laugh at you.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
NinaS said:
You claimed he was vindicated but the articles I sent you doesn’t sound like it. On the other hand, since he is associated with Trump he is as innocent as a newborn baby. Try reading the articles instead of giving some half assed answer. He isn’t being accused of molesting anyone, he’s just being accused of ignoring something that they said he knew about.
Click to expand...
No one was able to say with any certainty Jordan knew about it. And we're talking about men in college, not young boys.

STOP LYING AND BULLYING.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
FakeName said:
So we should hear from people who have like Mulvany and Bolton......but wait.....Trump is desperately trying to prevent them from testifying.

Why do you suppose that is?
Click to expand...
Why? Simple. One should never cooperate with losers trying to destroy them.

Duh!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
NinaS said:
Why do you always runoff the mouth and stock people? I do want to complement you on your avatar picture. You look just like I pictured you as looking
Click to expand...
No, I don't stock people. I do have some paint and other supplies for rental properties. But I don't stock people. What a bizarre notion.
 
E

EatTheRich

President
Marcus Aurelius said:
So, you don't like it whe politicians 'clown around'? You must have HATED it when Schiff-for-brains said this..."I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand. Lots of it. On this and on that...."

Complete fabrication, that Schiff-for-brains later described as 'parody'. You know... clowning around.
Click to expand...
What part of that paraphrase was inaccurate?
 
PhilFish

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
NinaS said:
So why do you seem to think he didn’t know what was going on? Because he Senso? Pretty sad when you automatically believe a Trumpy no matter what the evidence says otherwise.
Click to expand...
Huh?

Er sorry. Soooo guilty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top