New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Anyone Else Notice What's Missing From The Impeachment Hearings?

D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Oh sure, we have witnesses testifying they're unaware of any crimes, never met Trump, didn't hear any phone call, have little to no firsthand testimony to offer.

But remember when the Mueller fiasco collapsed? Liberals told about evidence of collusion, blah blah blah instances of obstruction of justice.

Why aren't these impeachment hearings focusing on any of that devastating evidence that we were told was in the Mueller report?

I think we all know the answer to that question.

Oh and of course, the lack of testimony regarding anything in the Mueller report clearly nullifies any previous "bombshell" posts made about the Weissman witch hunt.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Oh and by the way, don't you think DemocRATS would have tried anything and everything in their power to salvage something from the Mueller report when it came out? Of course they did. So digging through it again is just a silly ruse to sucker the low information voter into thinking there still might be something there. I think you know the type.
 

EatTheRich

President
Oh and by the way, don't you think DemocRATS would have tried anything and everything in their power to salvage something from the Mueller report when it came out? Of course they did. So digging through it again is just a silly ruse to sucker the low information voter into thinking there still might be something there. I think you know the type.
No, Bannon’s testimony in Stone’s trial and Stone’s conviction make this a much stronger case than it had been previously.
 
Oh sure, we have witnesses testifying they're unaware of any crimes, never met Trump, didn't hear any phone call, have little to no firsthand testimony to offer.

But remember when the Mueller fiasco collapsed? Liberals told about evidence of collusion, blah blah blah instances of obstruction of justice.

Why aren't these impeachment hearings focusing on any of that devastating evidence that we were told was in the Mueller report?

I think we all know the answer to that question.

Oh and of course, the lack of testimony regarding anything in the Mueller report clearly nullifies any previous "bombshell" posts made about the Weissman witch hunt.
Adam Schiff needs to present the "incontrovertible" evidence he's been claiming he has. Anything less is obstruction of justice on his part.
 

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
I do think Mr. Sondland provided that information today or did you miss that ?
he provided the information that there was no quid pro quo, no bribery, no link to aid and investigations, no criminal activity on the part of the President.

Or did you miss THAT?
 
Oh and by the way, don't you think DemocRATS would have tried anything and everything in their power to salvage something from the Mueller report when it came out? Of course they did. So digging through it again is just a silly ruse to sucker the low information voter into thinking there still might be something there. I think you know the type.
Hell. Lefty still thinks Trump colluded with Russia...
 

EatTheRich

President
he provided the information that there was no quid pro quo, no bribery, no link to aid and investigations, no criminal activity on the part of the President.

Or did you miss THAT?
He said there was a quid pro quo, that all Trump cared about was the investigations, and that it amounted to bribery.
 
Top