New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Turley drops giant bomb in midst of Judiciary hearing

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Let’s find the strawman who said it was and give him a good scolding.

;-)
You said it, Bugsy:
Bugsy McGurk said:
Trump is also accused of perjury, and dozens of other offenses as well.

But that doesn’t matter to a contrarian hack like Turley, or Trump’s cultists.

Bottom line - the Republicans knew they could never find any respectable law professor to argue that the charges against Trump are not impeachable offenses, so they brought in Turley to help Trump and the GOP argue that the House should just let Trump run out the clock while he busily works to rig the next election.

No sale.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Who are the “crazed” who made Trump order his people to defy impeachment inquiry subpoenas requiring testimony and documents?

Would that have beenObama Wingman Eric Holder ?
The First Atty Gen to be held in contempt for ignoring a subpoena and going to Disney World.
Of course
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
of course they are!! i think they should have given them two, just to err on the side of fairness, unlike what the repubs did in the House when they impeached Clinton for getting an illegal blowjob. but, like trump voters says to democrats when they complain about trump gutting the EPA, or having a secretary of education who says flat earth arguments should be left for college level science courses, or about trump starting a policy of separating children from their parents at the border, some of whom are still not reunited with their parents, or trump appeasing his boyfriend Erdogan by giving him the green light to slaughter Kurds and take control of ISIS prisoners he is now threatening to let loose in Europe because of sanctions, ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
I feel like you're confusing me with somebody else. I think you ought to work on that. Nice screed.

it is unfortunate that there is no balance in these proceedings. I'm sure a full Senate trial will remedy that
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
This blew Twitter up like crazy. Basically 3 against one- and Turley was by far the best on that stage.

Obviously the least scripted.

Between the way scripted old hag and the pajama boy- Those 2 Turned America off.
People don't like radical leftists.

Blimpy Nadler didn't help either.

Turley The Democrat laid it out- perfectly.
he didn't spend his time scowling and being a fronted, and dramatizing the whole thing
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
"If you have personal knowledge of a single material fact in the Schiff report, please raise your hand. "



"And let the record reflect no personal knowledge of a single fact and you know what, that continues on the tradition we saw from Adam Schiff."

That was the end of this circus for a majority of America.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Guilt by accusation is not in the constitution.
The mistake made by the dumb-ass Democrats is counting too heavily on Law Professors instead of constitutional scholars.
Lawyers are trained to find loopholes and to twist the truth. That's the only way the Shittff show could make a case against the president.
Jonathon Turley, being a constitutional scholar told them the truth and they don't like it.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Jonathan Turley on "obstruction": "If you impeach a president -- if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts -- it IS an abuse of power. It's YOUR abuse of power. You are doing precisely what you're criticizing the president for doing."

Mic drop- kaboom- game over- pass go- do not collect 200.
I believe you’re pretending that Trump and all his people have gone to court to challenge the subpoenas. Not true. To take a notable example, Mick Mulvaney, a key witness, defied his subpoena and went to court, and he then promptly dropped his case, no doubt at Trump’s insistence. There is no court case - there’s just a presidential order directing all his people to defy impeachment inquiry subpoenas for documents and testimony.

In any event, even if Trump went to court to block all impeachment inquiry subpoenas, the obstruction would be no less clear. If all such subpoenas can be defied and litigated all the way up to the SCOTUS because a president declared the inquiry to be “illegitimate,” then there is no impeachment power, despite it being set forth in the Constitution. We then have what Trump wants - a completely lawless presidency. The destruction of our constitutional system, replaced by authoritarian rule. Turley is a fool.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
he didn't spend his time scowling and being a fronted, and dramatizing the whole thing

Turley came across as the only one from which you could actually LEARN.

Screechy bitter Karlan was SO scripted and full of hatred it was hysterical. Especially when questioned by Jackson Lee. Dumb & Dumber.

Then Noah Feldman lying like crazy- saying he was on the fence on impeachment until that phone call.

When he was crying for impeachment ONLINE AND IN PRINT 2017. 2018. Etc,.
 

Boltlady

Mayor
As you must know by now the law is not clear on that, that is the office of the President is within its constitutional authority to do so.
People keep forgetting how much information and considerations are being denied to Trump and the Republicans in general. They keep talking about how congress carries equal weight with the executive branch and yet they keep trying to keep the executive branch from taking more than an absolute minimum part in this impeachment fiasco. If they want more cooperation from Trump they need to get off of some of the things they're sitting on.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
The mistake made by the dumb-ass Democrats is counting too heavily on Law Professors instead of constitutional scholars.
Lawyers are trained to find loopholes and to twist the truth. That's the only way the Shittff show could make a case against the president.
Jonathon Turley, being a constitutional scholar told them the truth and they don't like it.

Correct. 2 Gay Butthurt leftist professors- does not a Constitutional Scholar make.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
The mistake made by the dumb-ass Democrats is counting too heavily on Law Professors instead of constitutional scholars.
Lawyers are trained to find loopholes and to twist the truth. That's the only way the Shittff show could make a case against the president.
Jonathon, being a constitutional scholar told them the truth and they don't like it.
Hello? Turley is a law professor.

BTW, autocorrect keeps trying to change “Turley” to “turkey.”

;-)
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Turley came across as the only one from which you could actually LEARN.

Screechy bitter Karlan was SO scripted and full of hatred it was hysterical. Especially when questioned by Jackson Lee. Dumb & Dumber.

Then Noah Feldman lying like crazy- saying he was on the fence on impeachment until that phone call.

When he was crying for impeachment ONLINE AND IN PRINT 2017. 2018. Etc,.
He set the tone exactly right. this isn't some kind of joke. This is some serious shit and if you want to impeach the president of the United States you damn well better have your ducks in a row. Yeah feelings and what you think you heard do not an impeachment make
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
You said it, Bugsy:
Bugsy McGurk said:
Trump is also accused of perjury, and dozens of other offenses as well.

But that doesn’t matter to a contrarian hack like Turley, or Trump’s cultists.

Bottom line - the Republicans knew they could never find any respectable law professor to argue that the charges against Trump are not impeachable offenses, so they brought in Turley to help Trump and the GOP argue that the House should just let Trump run out the clock while he busily works to rig the next election.

No sale.
I said no such thing. I’m sure you know that.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
I'll bet professor Karlan is fun at parties!
I hear she teaches courses that lead to a Minor in Legal Scolding and Obstreperous Pomposity.
That's a good degree. Obstreperous pomposity will get you a job passing items over a barcode scanner at the Walmart, but at least you'll know how to demand twice the salary for it
 

llovejim

Current Champion
This blew Twitter up like crazy. Basically 3 against one- and Turley was by far the best on that stage.

Obviously the least scripted.

Between the way scripted old hag and the pajama boy- Those 2 Turned America off.
People don't like radical leftists.

Blimpy Nadler didn't help either.

Turley The Democrat laid it out- perfectly.
every real expert on law said turley sucked, even two fox legal experts, including Judge Nappy. the old hag, you spew about, kicked ass up one side and down the other. and Turley is not a democrat, as far as anyone knows. he testified against clinton during his impeachment, he has represented both democratic and republicans in different hearings and testimony....there is no proof one way or the other I could find....show me where you found turley is a democrat. Turley is not all bad, he is right about a lot of things, but he is wrong about this and lied about some facts.

FROM THE INCREDIBLY RIGHT WING MEDIA NEWSMAX-

Law Expert: Congress Doesn't Need Courts to Impeach

https://www.newsmax.com › politics › 2019/12/04

16 hours ago - Law expert Jonathan Turley's argument that going to the courts to fight a ... cannot be obstruction was rejected by two Fox News legal analysts Wednesday. ... "Where I disagree with my dear friend — I've worked with him and ...

AND EVEN BREITBART-

FNC's Napolitano, McCarthy Push Back on Turley's ... - Breitbart

https://www.breitbart.com › clips › 2019/12/04 › fncs-napolitano-mccarth...

15 hours ago - On Wednesday, during Fox News Channel's special coverage of the Judiciary Committee ... FNC's Napolitano, McCarthy Push Back on Turley's ... Napolitano said, “Where I disagree with my dear friend, I've worked with him ...
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
His expertise is in constitutional law.
Same with the rest of them.

But Turley wasn’t even arguing constitutional law. He argued politics - that impeachment shouldn’t be pursued because many Americans don’t support it, and because he said the House should chase Trump down all his illegal rabbit holes before proceeding.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Same with the rest of them.

But Turley wasn’t even arguing constitutional law. He argued politics - that impeachment shouldn’t be pursued because many Americans don’t support it, and because he said the House should chase Trump down all his illegal rabbit holes before proceeding.
Nope
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
every real expert on law said turley sucked, even two fox legal experts, including Judge Nappy. the old hag, you spew about, kicked ass up one side and down the other. and Turley is not a democrat, as far as anyone knows. he testified against clinton during his impeachment, he has represented both democratic and republicans in different hearings and testimony....there is no proof one way or the other I could find....show me where you found turley is a democrat. Turley is not all bad, he is right about a lot of things, but he is wrong about this and lied about some facts.

FROM THE INCREDIBLY RIGHT WING MEDIA NEWSMAX-

Law Expert: Congress Doesn't Need Courts to Impeach

https://www.newsmax.com › politics › 2019/12/04

16 hours ago - Law expert Jonathan Turley's argument that going to the courts to fight a ... cannot be obstruction was rejected by two Fox News legal analysts Wednesday. ... "Where I disagree with my dear friend — I've worked with him and ...

AND EVEN BREITBART-

FNC's Napolitano, McCarthy Push Back on Turley's ... - Breitbart

https://www.breitbart.com › clips › 2019/12/04 › fncs-napolitano-mccarth...

15 hours ago - On Wednesday, during Fox News Channel's special coverage of the Judiciary Committee ... FNC's Napolitano, McCarthy Push Back on Turley's ... Napolitano said, “Where I disagree with my dear friend, I've worked with him ...
Turley should change his title to Assistant Gaslighter.

;-)
 
Top