Any of those running for office this November? They're private citizens/organizations. .Brennan? who all lied ? And Maddow, MSNBC, CNN etc ?
Any of those running for office this November? They're private citizens/organizations. .Brennan? who all lied ? And Maddow, MSNBC, CNN etc ?
Of course they do Very similar to the MSM.Twitter has already announced Trump is actually different and they have a different set of rules for him.
They will already drop the twitter hammer down on them for breaking the rules. Enforcing the rules against Trump is the new development. Trump doesn't like being held to the same standards as everyone else.Any of those running for office this November? They're private citizens/organizations. .
Yes, the MSM should be doing a much better job of fact-checking Trump instead of just giving him a platform to spew his bullshit. They don't though, because he is their bread n butter.Of course they do Very similar to the MSM.
Negative. You express such sillinessYes, the MSM should be doing a much better job of fact-checking Trump instead of just giving him a platform to spew his bullshit. They don't though, because he is their bread n butter.
so, freedom of speech only applies to people NOT running for office?Any of those running for office this November? They're private citizens/organizations. .
Freedom of Speech doesn't apply when you using someone else's property to make it.so, freedom of speech only applies to people NOT running for office?
Twitter is not a government organization or public entity. There are no 1st Amendment/"freedom of speech" rights on Twitter.freedom of speech only applies to people NOT running for office
completely not my point, as you well know. I was pointing out a double standard.Freedom of Speech doesn't apply when you using someone else's property to make it.
It was already used on everyone. They have a special exemption carved out for Trump that they are merely reigning in.completely not my point, as you well know. I was pointing out a double standard.
Do you feel that a warning link like the one Trump had, should be used on everyone, or just on Trump?
so then you agree the warning label should be applied to everyone, equally, or just people Twitter doesnt like?Twitter is not a government organization or public entity. There are no 1st Amendment/"freedom of speech" rights on Twitter.
Twitter has the right to do either as I do in my place of business. I support that. I don't do Twitter so it doesn't matter to me what they do. I am not their custiomer.so then you agree the warning label should be applied to everyone, equally, or just people Twitter doesnt like?
Looks like a redirect to me...my posts are deleted when I mention a name that is not the topic name.Will they be fact checking Schiff ? Brennan? who all lied ? And Maddow, MSNBC, CNN etc ?
I don't see any brains there...not surprised.
whining about moderation, now THAT is a redirect.Looks like a redirect to me...my posts are deleted when I mention a name that is not the topic name.
Twitter has been letting Trump get by with his lying and boasting for years. It's about time they do something about it. And BTW....what about his lie about Scarborough "killing" his ex employee? He wasn't even in the state when she died. YET Trump, not being able to stand it that a Republican is smart eough to hate his guts and see him for what he really is, thinks he has to demean her memory and payback time for Joe. Disgusting old POS...TRUMP. Look how many lives that fat pompous lying creep has ruined in his lifetime.Negative....that is "different"
completely not my point, as you well know. I was pointing out a double standard.
Do you feel that a warning link like the one Trump had, should be used on everyone, or just on Trump?
whining about moderation, now THAT is a redirect.
please, go find a post of mine where I whined about moderation of my posts. We'll wait.You don't mind it when it works for you.