New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Take your justice and shove it

The people who are breaking windows and looting are taking advantage of a crowd...nothing more. They aren't there to protest civil rights or the murder of a man at the hands of police. They are there because they think it is fun or they make money selling stolen stuff.

Nothing more.
I don't often agree with you, but this time I do.
 

Colorforms

Senator
No, you are.

"The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. "
It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter.

Hence why it's called a massacre and not a riot.

It started out as a brawl and turned into a massacre. This wasn't colonists going around torching homes and killing people.

Even in colonial times people were more civilized than democrats are now. I think they're devolving.
 

FakeName

Governor
It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter.

Hence why it's called a massacre and not a riot.

It started out as a brawl and turned into a massacre. This wasn't colonists going around torching homes and killing people.

Even in colonial times people were more civilized than democrats are now. I think they're devolving.
"The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. "
 

Colorforms

Senator
"The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. "
Yeah yeah... I know how it is once you've found your narrative. Reality and logic be damned. No problem. Considering how you're for killing people so long as it's the left doing it, I don't consider you particularly sane anyway.
 

FakeName

Governor
Yeah yeah... I know how it is once you've found your narrative. Reality and logic be damned. No problem. Considering how you're for killing people so long as it's the left doing it, I don't consider you particularly sane anyway.
you are the one ignoring reality and logic. rioting and looting are part of the American origen story.

And no I absolutely do not support killing people so long as the left is doing it.

You lie about my position and make personal insults, questioning my sanity, because you have absolutely failed to make your point.

Thanks for conceding.
 

Colorforms

Senator
you are the one ignoring reality and logic. rioting and looting are part of the American origen story.

And no I absolutely do not support killing people so long as the left is doing it.

You lie about my position and make personal insults, questioning my sanity, because you have absolutely failed to make your point.

Thanks for conceding.
You defend these riots and say they are as American as the Boston tea party. People have died in these riots, killed by rioters. YOU defend them.

I rest my case. :)
 

FakeName

Governor
You defend these riots and say they are as American as the Boston tea party. People have died in these riots, killed by rioters. YOU defend them.

I rest my case. :)
Saying riots are as American as apple pie is just a fact. It is neither a defense or an attack.

As is always the case, the value of such things depends on your perspective.

Just like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Lying about my position won't help you.
 
Last edited:

Colorforms

Senator
Saying they are as American as apple pie is just a fact. It is neither a defense or an attack.

As is always the case, the value of such things depends on your perspective.

Just like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Lying about my position won't help you.
LOL in one sentence you call them freedom fighters and in the next you say I lied about you defending them.

You keep proving just how right I was about you. :)
 

FakeName

Governor
Ok, let's look at that since apperantly comprehension isn't you thing.

I said:

"As is always the case, the value of such things depends on your perspective.

Just like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

So did I call them a freedom fighter?

Or did I call them a terrorist?

Fact is, I called them neither, just pointed out that the value of such things depends on your perspective.

By the way that is a Reagan quote, and he wasn't saying a particular group was a terrorist or a freedom fighter, he was pointing out that what you call them depends on your perspective.

Now do you understand?

Do I get an apology?
 

Colorforms

Senator
Ok, let's look at that since apperantly comprehension isn't you thing.

I said:

"As is always the case, the value of such things depends on your perspective.

Just like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

So did I call them a freedom fighter?

Or did I call them a terrorist?

Fact is, I called them neither, just pointed out that the value of such things depends on your perspective.

By the way that is a Reagan quote, and he wasn't saying a particular group was a terrorist or a freedom fighter, he was pointing out that what you call them depends on your perspective.

Now do you understand?

Do I get an apology?
I know what you said, that's how I know I'm right.
 

FakeName

Governor
I know what you said, that's how I know I'm right.
I just quoted it again for you.

"As is always the case, the value of such things depends on your perspective.

Just like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

I know you know what I said, you just didn't understand it.

Re read it, slowly. How do you figure I called them freedom fighters? why aren't you accusing me of calling them terrorists?

Why don't you understand that I called them neither, I just used a Reagan quote to point out that what you call them, terrorists or freedom fighters, depends on your perspective.

Amazing to me that you were so confused by that.
 

Colorforms

Senator
I just quoted it again for you.

"As is always the case, the value of such things depends on your perspective.

Just like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

I know you know what I said, you just didn't understand it.

Re read it, slowly. How do you figure I called them freedom fighters? why aren't you accusing me of calling them terrorists?

Why don't you understand that I called them neither, I just used a Reagan quote to point out that what you call them, terrorists or freedom fighters, depends on your perspective.

Amazing to me that you were so confused by that.
You're on the record and I saved the thread. You aren't weaseling out of it. Like you say, words matter, and yours is a matter of record. :)
 

FakeName

Governor
You're on the record and I saved the thread. You aren't weaseling out of it. Like you say, words matter, and yours is a matter of record. :)
Yes I am on the record. I have quoted it for you four times now. The record is perfectly clear. My point is clear.

The only question is how is it that you seem wholly incapable of understanding the words right in front of you?

Do we need to go over it again?

Can you quote the part where you think I said d the rioters are freedom fighters?

Can you at least man up and admit your mistake.
 

FakeName

Governor
Again, #88 :)
Right, I keep quoting it for you word for word.

You can't explain where I called the rioters freedom fighters, because I didn't.

You completely missed my point.

So instead you continue to lie about it.

You either lack the ability to understand or the honor to admit your mistake. which is it?
 

Colorforms

Senator
Right, I keep quoting it for you word for word.

You can't explain where I called the rioters freedom fighters, because I didn't.

You completely missed my point.

So instead you continue to lie about it.

You either lack the ability to understand or the honor to admit your mistake. which is it?
I know what your point was, that's why I'm saving the thread. :)
 

FakeName

Governor
I know what your point was, that's why I'm saving the thread. :)
You keep saying my point was that the rioters are freedom fighters.

I never said any such thing. You are either lying or not comprehending what I did say.

Save it. The record is clear.
 
Top