Wow, that is a looooooooooong sentence!
Instant paragraph. Just add periods.
Meanwhile, I'm not seeing a point at which ancient superstitions will ever be abandoned by Theists, regardless of new scientific discoveries.
Consider what we already know and have known for a long time: evolution. It's absolutely how species came to be. No doubt whatsoever, except by some who simply deny it on its face, not caring to deal with the obvious truth, except maybe copy paste some absurd and patently false postulate from a Web site that serves the willfully ignorant.
Solution? Simple, for most Theists, especially Christians in the US: it's how God created us. It utterly contradicts the Biblical description of creation, which is already in utter contrast of biological processes we know and learned in school, ie, single breeding pairs, Noah's Ark, the definition of extinction due to lack of genetic diversity needed to sustain a species. Hell; one hundred breeding pairs is endangered species list. The Biblical creation reeks the ignorance of the time the Bible came from. So ignore the obviously absurd claims on specifics of human and animal existence and focus on what speaks to God's wish for us and believe it all or mostly all, well not all obviously since there's no one alive that thinks planting with mingled seeds is a sin not an abomination unto God.
Heck; just accept God is there, and maybe the nutty stuff is misunderstood but the relevant to today this or that is His will works just fine. Plus Jesus loves us, and also has a form, mentally we can visualize as something real. Plus he went through unimaginable misery for us. Easy.
A stain to any critical thinking person to see it as even close to factual, and self contradicting, but to people who believe, it's cake. God is. He cares. He wants us to be good. So go with our sense of good by today's standards. Attend church. Accept it unquestioningly. To do anything other than that ignores the simple truth that a god has to exist, and Almighty God is that.
Never will that acceptance of something not a shread of evidence supports, but it is, deeply, by an overwhelming majority, ever be challenged, at any time, no matter the evidence against it, which exists already. Samo samo in 200 years.
No doubt of it.