Yup, that is what Adolph and Mussolini would have done...Shoot him in the head.
Yup, that is what Adolph and Mussolini would have done...Shoot him in the head.
So the dems follow the rule of law, as it is documented in the constitution, and your defense is to call it a witch hunt.There is no Constitutional process for a witch hunt
so Clinton's lie mattered to you and you think that amounted to perjury, but Trump's lies are unimportant.Where did I post what you ask?
So, Slicks insurance was free, would you say the same on national TV?
I have no idea and don't care and who gives a schiff other than progs?
He committed treason. Don't you think a shot in the head is more humane than hanging?Yup, that is what Adolph and Mussolini would have done...
so Clinton's lie mattered to you and you think that amounted to perjury, but Trump's lies are unimportant.
There is a reason for the second amendment tyrants like that is the caseYup, that is what Adolph and Mussolini would have done...
They change the rules like tyrants doSo the dems follow the rule of law, as it is documented in the constitution, and your defense is to call it a witch hunt.
Wasn't aware Slick was under oath when he lied on national TV...……..so Clinton's lie mattered to you and you think that amounted to perjury, but Trump's lies are unimportant.
"dems follow the rules"...……………..Schiff should be under oath every time he speaks:So the dems follow the rule of law, as it is documented in the constitution, and your defense is to call it a witch hunt.
i just laid out the constitutional process for you.There is no Constitutional process for a witch hunt
HINT: You investigate a particular crime to see if charges are warranted.i just laid out the constitutional process for you.
The democrats are following it exactly.
Hint:
you never charge a person with a crime and then investigate......its its other way around.....you investigate the facts and at the END of the investigation, not the BEGINNING, you make a decision on charging.
The probable cause is overwhelming.HINT: You investigate a particular crime to see if charges are warranted.
You don't investigate hoping to find a crime. That's called a fishing expedition.
Where is a witch Hunt located in the Constitution?i just laid out the constitutional process for you.
The democrats are following it exactly.
Hint:
you never charge a person with a crime and then investigate......its its other way around.....you investigate the facts and at the END of the investigation, not the BEGINNING, you make a decision on charging.
Same section that characterizes impeachment as a witch hunt.Where is a witch Hunt located in the Constitution?
Fake news isn't probable causeThe probable cause is overwhelming.
Check out the actual news.
Same rule applies to Trump?"dems follow the rules"...……………..Schiff should be under oath every time he speaks:
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/27/adam-schiff-should-be-forced-to-take-oath-before-e
It's your story show the factsSame section that characterizes impeachment as a witch hunt.
So it was fake news that Trump asked for a favor when the president of Ukraine mentioned buying anti-tank weapons to fight the Russians?Fake news isn't probable cause
Democratic wishful thinking and butthurt over losing an election is not probable cause.The probable cause is overwhelming.
So what crime were the republicans investigating for 6 years when Clinton was president?HINT: You investigate a particular crime to see if charges are warranted.
You don't investigate hoping to find a crime. That's called a fishing expedition.