estimates based on last two years.How could you know that if cost aren't reported?
Making schiff up again as usual...…………..
estimates based on last two years.How could you know that if cost aren't reported?
Making schiff up again as usual...…………..
We had two previous impeachments. Neither had our president tell people to ignore suboenas from congress.Executive Privilege is a fact of life. And why didn't the morons in the House call Bolton? Now they want the Senate to do their work, work which they botched and which historians will rip them apart over.
We had two previous impeachments. Neither had our president tell people to ignare suboenas from congress.
Not really. The House Managers who are acting as prosecutors in the Senate Trial are simply asking to interview witnesses who have first hand knowledge of the incidents on which the articles of impeachment are based. New information has been coming forth since the impeachment vote on December 18th also. Chief Justice Roberts should decide if any additional witnesses are Germaine to the case at hand. That seems to be reasonable and fair to me. What is your take regarding these issues? I would like to hear from Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani, Parnas, Fruman and several others who were involved.Executive Privilege is a fact of life.
Why didn't the House morons call Bolton? Hmmm? Now they want the Senate to do what they failed to do.
Not really. The House Managers who are acting as prosecutors in the Senate Trial are simply asking to interview witnesses who have first hand knowledge of the incidents on which the articles of impeachment are based. New information has been coming forth since the impeachment vote on December 18th also. Chief Justice Roberts should decide if any additional witnesses are Germaine to the case at hand. That seems to be reasonable and fair to me. What is your take regarding these issues? I would like to hear from Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani, Parnas, Fruman and several others who were involved.
You sound like lard ass Barr who suggested that the Mueller Report was “his baby” and went into his total exoneration mode as Trump’s butt boy. He withheld it for a month while Trump and Hannity went into their TD dance on the 20 yard line. Then when he finally did release it, anyone who could read found out it was anything but exoneration. If Mitchy does attempt to abort it, it will expose him as a cover up tool like Barr and hurt the GOP in November. Only low IQ Hannitized Ditto Head morons buy into this whole witch hunt, soft coup, hoax theory champ. The more truth that comes out, the worse it will be for Trump and his sleazy inept band of cohorts.New Information ? LOL
House had their chance to make the case but they were in a rush. Of course new fake information has come out (Like the Kavanaugh case)
This is now the senate's baby. And Mitchy will Abort it.
You sound like lard ass Barr who suggested that the Mueller Report was “his baby” and went into his total exoneration mode as Trump’s butt boy. He withheld it for a month while Trump and Hannity went into their TD dance on the 20 yard line. Then when he finally did release it, anyone who could read found out it was anything but exoneration. If Mitchy does attempt to abort it, it will expose him as a cover up tool like Barr and hurt the GOP in November. Only low IQ Hannitized Ditto Head morons buy into this whole witch hunt, soft coup, hoax theory champ. The more truth that comes out, the worse it will be for Trump and his sleazy inept band of cohorts.
Don’t miss Trump/Guiiani cohort Lev Parnas’ TV debut tonight on Maddow show. The hits just keep on coming.....Then next Sunday, Hand Grenade Rudy will be all over the place see how far he can stick his foot in his big stupid mouth and up Trumps ass for the hundredth time too. What the hell was Trump thinking when he hired these nit wits? That alone should warrant impeachment. LolOdd history revision. But cute, Jim.
Anyway- It will show an abuse of power. The House's abuse - as previously noted. As the only impeachment for non criminal acts.
It was already proven as a hoax. Thanks Low I.Q Base member ! woot woot !
The house did call for people to testify. The Trump loyalists refused. Why would Trump instruct them to stay silent?Executive Privilege is a fact of life.
Why didn't the House morons call Bolton? Hmmm? Now they want the Senate to do what they failed to do.
Trials have witnesses, coverups don't.Executive Privilege is a fact of life.
Why didn't the House morons call Bolton? Hmmm? Now they want the Senate to do what they failed to do.
Not really. The House Managers who are acting as prosecutors in the Senate Trial are simply asking to interview witnesses who have first hand knowledge of the incidents on which the articles of impeachment are based. New information has been coming forth since the impeachment vote on December 18th also. Chief Justice Roberts should decide if any additional witnesses are Germaine to the case at hand. That seems to be reasonable and fair to me. What is your take regarding these issues? I would like to hear from Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani, Parnas, Fruman and several others who were involved.
Trials have witnesses, coverups don't.
The house did call for people to testify. The Trump loyalists refused. Why would Trump instruct them to stay silent?
Bolton was scheduled to give a deposition and didn't show.
Don’t miss Trump/Guiiani cohort Lev Parnas’ TV debut tonight on Maddow show. The hits just keep on coming.....
That may be true, but this whole thing with Ukraine sure is sleazy and sordid. Certainly not the way an administration should deal with foreign policy issues. Trump could have simply replaced Ms. Yovonavich as was his right instead of siccing that band of imbeciles on her and creating this mess. Instead of admitting this obvious malfeasance, Trump is blaming those who pointed it out.LOL
Parnas was refused immunity by House Democrats. And he has already been caught in a lie by Chuck Ross. But then it was MSNBC.
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1217640777125376000?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed&ref_url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lev-parnas-rachel-maddow-trump-yovanovitch-ukraine-house-democrats
66% of Americans have never heard of John BoltonTwo-thirds of Americans surveyed want former national security adviser John Bolton to testify in the Senate impeachment trial, according to a Quinnipiac national poll of 1,562 voters released Monday.
71% of Americans want Trump to let his people testify at a senate trial.
The public is paying close attention. McConnell and Trump's plan to get the trial and proceedings dismissed....just won't happen.
1. Bolton was scheduled to appear and was a no show.Then why didn't they subpoena them and then ask for a court to enforce those subpoenas if the person refused? Hackery by the Democrats all around.
97.3% of all statistics are pulled out of thin air.66% of Americans have never heard of John Bolton
That tweet from Ross is proof of nothing.The House completely failed with Bolton and now desires the Senate to correct their error. They likely fumbled the ball over Bolton because they figured President Trump would claim Executive Privilege and their only recourse would be a court battle (which they would very likely lose).
Devioulsy they now desire the Senate to subpoena Bolton, with the Chief Justice present, and then if Trump claims Executive Privilege and if the Senate went to court over that matter they could claim Roberts needs to recuse when the matter hits the Supreme Court (you heard that here first).
As far as Giuliani s concerned President Trump will claim attorney-client privilege. President Trump would also claim Executive Privilege as far as Mulvaney goes.
The House Democrats refused to give Parnas immunity, so that tells you what he [Parnas] is all about. And there is this:
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1217640777125376000?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed&ref_url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lev-parnas-rachel-maddow-trump-yovanovitch-ukraine-house-democrats