New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

A viable alternative to the Affordable Care Act.

MaryAnne

Governor
I'm not necessarily a fan of insurance commissioners, but I don't quite understand the point your attack on them makes? And who is Mary Anne to be so viscerally proud of your attacks on others?
Maybe because Mary Anne can spot a shill when she sees one.

I find it odd that you join a board and attack the Health Care bill that many Presidents on both sides have wanted for 100 years.

I do not pretend the Health Care bill is perfect because of the manipulations of Congress, on both sides,but I do know it is the start to a decent health care for all Americans

I have watched this same battle over Medicare,and anything that works for the people,instead of special Interests!

I also find it very interesting that many, who are affected, Doctors, Medical boards,etc. want this bill.

Saving for Medical expenses is a foolish idea that would not work.
 
Why is this a bad idea? They don't actually fund anything, they don't provide any actual health care, and the added bureaucracy they introduce into the process adds to the cost. Of what use are they?
Yeah, because $60 Billion A YEAR in Medicare fraud is more efficient.
 

barbarap

Council Member
During the debate over obamacare and even today more and more doctors are giving up on insurance, medicare, and medicaid and only taking cash. They've stopped the paperwork overhead are charging less and making as much as before when they took insurance and government monies. Google it.

Yeah.... Google it because they can't put anything on the Internet that isn't true. Especially those anti ACA web sites .... ;)
 

MaryAnne

Governor
1. Up until obamacare buying health insurance was voluntary too.

2. You can wish in one hand and have shit in the other as far as single payer goes.

Abortion in Roe v. Wade was largely determined on the right to privacy; exactly where did that right to privacy go when obamacare came along?
So now we get to the Right Wing talking points!
 

MaryAnne

Governor
Yeah.... Google it because they can't put anything on the Internet that isn't true. Especially those anti ACA web sites .... ;)
Ya think that top post might be one of those reliable emails that float around like the one I had last week offering to share lottery winnings with me? :)
 
Maybe because Mary Anne can spot a shill when she sees one.

I find it odd that you join a board and attack the Health Care bill that many Presidents on both sides have wanted for 100 years.

I do not pretend the Health Care bill is perfect because of the manipulations of Congress, on both sides,but I do know it is the start to a decent health care for all Americans

I have watched this same battle over Medicare,and anything that works for the people,instead of special Interests!

I also find it very interesting that many, who are affected, Doctors, Medical boards,etc. want this bill.

Saving for Medical expenses is a foolish idea that would not work.

Do you talk in third person much (lol)?

There are polls speaking to MANY doctors quitting the profession because of Obamacare and I can't imagine anyone stating that "Saving for Medical expenses is a foolish idea...." like you just did could possible be taken seriously.
 
So now we get to the Right Wing talking points!
You must be an older lady who is sick and afraid she won't have her medical needs covered. It must cloud your perceptions on this issue. Which is tragic because the first stipulation in the details is that medicaid, medicare, and the VA must be maintained, but to maintain those socialist elements you have to have a much larger capitalist system in place to pay for it.
 
People who have actually worked and lived in Canada don't need to Google up your fruitcake Tea Party propaganda to understand that you're full of it.
Obamacare is a fruitcake idea by any reasonable measure. Society needs elements of socialism but the larger part has to be capitalism in order to pay for it. It's a simple law of human endeavor of what provides dynamism to a system. Don't you belong on lpsg? ;0)
 

MaryAnne

Governor
You must be an older lady who is sick and afraid she won't have her medical needs covered. It must cloud your perceptions on this issue. Which is tragic because the first stipulation in the details is that medicaid, medicare, and the VA must be maintained, but to maintain those socialist elements you have to have a much larger capitalist system in place to pay for it.
I have lived long enough to see a talking point when I see it. My age is not the question. Those who are not on any program are the ones who would be in trouble.

As for sick and afraid, you want to join me on my early morning two mile walk?

Your insult to those who may be older than you is more proof of just what you are.
 

MaryAnne

Governor
Obamacare is a fruitcake idea by any reasonable measure. Society needs elements of socialism but the larger part has to be capitalism in order to pay for it. It's a simple law of human endeavor of what provides dynamism to a system. Don't you belong on lpsg? ;0)

Keep going,Governor. Soon you will be complaining about that 47%.
 
I have lived long enough to see a talking point when I see it. My age is not the question. Those who are not on any program are the ones who would be in trouble.

As for sick and afraid, you want to join me on my early morning two mile walk?

Your insult to those who may be older than you is more proof of just what you are.
Even if I were to stipulate to anything I said being a 'talking point' the fact is that talking points are not intrinsically a bad thing. They in fact are a good thing. They are a bad thing when people simply reiterate talking points with nothing to back them up with subsequent logical discourse.

And of course I did not insult anybody for being older or ill but simply illustrated the possible source of their fear and discomfort at new ideas.

Congratulations on your early morning two mile walks.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE PLAN AS IT SHOULD BE.

To save the quality of our healthcare and expand coverage we need to change our insurance paradigm. No longer should insurance cover regular, urgent, or mild chronic care. The only insurance people should be able to purchase should be emergency and catastrophic coverage. People should be able to pay out of pocket for much of the healthcare they receive. To do so we need a new Health Savings Account (H.S.A.) paradigm. People should be able to put a dollar into an H.S.A. completely tax free. In other words if I made $50,000 this fiscal year and put $8,000 into my H.S.A., then my income taxes should start being calculated at $42,000. Whatever my employer contributes to my H.S.A. should also be completely tax free and that H.S.A. should be a lifetime right.

In exchange for that tax right I should NOT be able to spend that $8,000 on any other thing other than actual healthcare or health insurance coverage (i.e. emergency/catastrophic insurance). That $8,000 is now in a new and separate marketplace – one reserved for healthcare related purchases only – never to be taken out for any other reason than for medical need. It would be a debit card system with HSA funds only that would accumulate over the years. This solves our national healthcare problems period.

THE DETAILS

Truly, the devil is in the details and so it should be stated that Medicaid, Medicare, and the VA should continue to exist but changed to reflect the new healthcare paradigm. The government should subsidize H.S.A. accounts for the poor, the retired, and veterans while providing for the emergency/catastrophic healthcare insurance (and services). VA hospitals should not be closed.

Insurance premiums should be legally tied to preventative medical care such as regular checkups, blood tests, measured fitness scores…. If you have checkups, blood tests, good fitness scores for your age group, and/or a good track record for managing your existing ailments, then your premiums should be less than for those who do not have better life long health practices.

Monies in the healthcare market (i.e. in Health Saving Accounts) should be freely transferable from one HSA account to another HSA account without any kind of penalty. This would allow families to take care of each others’ healthcare costs and expedite securely charity donations. As long as the money is spent in the healthcare market everybody will benefit from this provision.

All healthcare providers should be required to post all healthcare costs on the internet for the purposes to enable shopping for healthcare services. The difference in healthcare services will then reflect the quality of care being provided. This is one benefit of shopping for services. The other benefit to shopping for healthcare is that fraud will drop drastically when the shopper’s own finite allowance for healthcare is on the line.

Today the U.S. subsidizes the healthcare of other advanced nations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and countries Europe. Our drugs cost less in those countries than they do here. In Switzerland the government mandates their drug manufacturing industry to charge less than cost and are then needing to charge those outside of Switzerland much more than cost plus profit. Why are we subsidizing socialized medicine in these countries? Enough is enough.

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) needs to be repealed. Physicians once again need to be given their constitutional rights back to create and run practices as ongoing business concerns. Businesses like dentistry, cosmetic surgery, and lasik eye surgery have generally not been paid for by health insurance companies and they are yet thriving businesses. Freeing the entire medical field and putting purchasing choices in the hands of consumers will increase the numbers covered and increase the quality of care.

Tax free Health Savings Accounts are the ultimate in healthcare transportability plans period. They cross state lines without any problem whatsoever and do not infringe on privacy rights the government would get rid of.

For every one hundred new cases of people with pre-existing conditions (every fiscal year) the insurance industry should be required to enroll 70 of them into one of their plans. Insurance companies will then compete via price for these patients/clients with pre-existing conditions. They will be looking and competing for the least sick of these individuals. The remaining 30 of 100 should be then placed on some Medicaid program tailored for their needs and circumstances.

If someone earns $10 million and puts $5 million into his or her Health Saving Account tax free, that is fine. That money can’t be spent on anything else but healthcare, will be used instead of others’ tax money, and will drive medical discoveries. Steve Jobs’ medical issues were paid for by him and any new discoveries will eventually be shared by all and at a lower cost.

Health discoveries earned in part or in whole on the public dime (at the State or Federal level) that lead to new or better healthcare products should earn their fair share of revenue that should be funneled into the Medicaid-Medicare-VA system. If a discovery was 50% funded by government, then government should earn 50% of the profits for as long as a patent is held.

Taxing medical devices to lower healthcare prices and increase coverage is an oxymoron that needs to be repealed and I guess has been but needs to be permanently taken off the table as viable idea.

A new, licensed profession of Healthcare Advisor should be established to advocate for and help citizens navigate through their healthcare decisions should they decide they such help.

I, the undersigned citizen, support this alternative and petition for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Signature: Date:
Address:

Please sign and send to your Federal representatives. Ask your friends and family to do so too.
Actually, I initially thought you'd put some thought into this. Now that I've read it for the third time and think it is actually on the border between ridiculous and insanity.

1. Someone making $50k is absolutely not going to put $8k into an HSA. I currently pay half of my premium of $7k. My employer gets a tax break on their half. I guess you are saying let's make the entire $7k tax free. Ok...so far so good...so the government subsidy for my healthcare just increased. I guess you are suggesting I can either buy insurance with that $7k or just put it into the HSA and pay bills....and somehow that is going to lower prices....
2. And how is an HSA going to fund medical discoveries? Are you actually saying that an HSA can be used by a drug company to fund research?
3.All healthcare providers should be required to post all healthcare costs on the internet for the purposes to enable shopping for healthcare services. The difference in healthcare services will then reflect the quality of care being provided. Yeah, sure thing.

Your comment about the 50% of the population that pays taxes will be paying for healthcare for the 50% of those who don't is where you become a comedy act. The population is about 350 million. There are about 35 million with no healthcare insurance. Many of those 35 million are working poor. Many have jobs that do not provide insurance. Many are children. The Affordable Care Act is intended to help them. I've seen no change in my premium for the last year. Two years ago I changed jobs and my premium went down for a better plan that I previously had. I have had a job related insurance plan since I got out of the Navy in 1975....and every year my premiums have gone up.

The TIME magazine article about health care costs was pretty interesting. You have people like the CEO of United Healthcare getting a salary of $100 million and non-profit hospitals having to jump through major hoops to avoid actually having to admit that they are profitable. They buy other hospitals and close them....they spend a fortune on unnecessary upgrades. One story was about a hospital that paid millions for new robotic devices for surgery while they still have working (last years model) robots....and none of them are more than 10% utilized.

Yes, we have foreign countries that put an artificial limit on drugs coming into their countries....so someone in France pays less than what is charged in our country. You offer a complaint, but no solution....

What has to happen is we look at the Affordable Care Act and begin to fix the things that need fixing. The fact is that the entire act isn't a problem. Pre-existing conditions isn't as black and white as you think. It isn't about not having insurance and suddenly going out to buy it....it is frequently used to drop someone because their condition was congenital. So you have cystic fibrosis and it wasn't diagnosed for years...now that they know they say "Ah, that is a pre-existing condition" and even though you've been insured for 20 years they try to weasel their way out of coverage.

Covering kids on their parents policy until 26 is likewise, not a problem.

Eliminating recision was also a good idea.

I don't like the fact that my liability for employee insurance after 2017 is pretty much unknown. I'd like for them to enact some kind of safety net for business.
 
Actually, I initially thought you'd put some thought into this. Now that I've read it for the third time and think it is actually on the border between ridiculous and insanity.

1. Someone making $50k is absolutely not going to put $8k into an HSA. I currently pay half of my premium of $7k. My employer gets a tax break on their half. I guess you are saying let's make the entire $7k tax free. Ok...so far so good...so the government subsidy for my healthcare just increased. I guess you are suggesting I can either buy insurance with that $7k or just put it into the HSA and pay bills....and somehow that is going to lower prices....
2. And how is an HSA going to fund medical discoveries? Are you actually saying that an HSA can be used by a drug company to fund research?
3.All healthcare providers should be required to post all healthcare costs on the internet for the purposes to enable shopping for healthcare services. The difference in healthcare services will then reflect the quality of care being provided. Yeah, sure thing.

Your comment about the 50% of the population that pays taxes will be paying for healthcare for the 50% of those who don't is where you become a comedy act. The population is about 350 million. There are about 35 million with no healthcare insurance. Many of those 35 million are working poor. Many have jobs that do not provide insurance. Many are children. The Affordable Care Act is intended to help them. I've seen no change in my premium for the last year. Two years ago I changed jobs and my premium went down for a better plan that I previously had. I have had a job related insurance plan since I got out of the Navy in 1975....and every year my premiums have gone up.

The TIME magazine article about health care costs was pretty interesting. You have people like the CEO of United Healthcare getting a salary of $100 million and non-profit hospitals having to jump through major hoops to avoid actually having to admit that they are profitable. They buy other hospitals and close them....they spend a fortune on unnecessary upgrades. One story was about a hospital that paid millions for new robotic devices for surgery while they still have working (last years model) robots....and none of them are more than 10% utilized.

Yes, we have foreign countries that put an artificial limit on drugs coming into their countries....so someone in France pays less than what is charged in our country. You offer a complaint, but no solution....

What has to happen is we look at the Affordable Care Act and begin to fix the things that need fixing. The fact is that the entire act isn't a problem. Pre-existing conditions isn't as black and white as you think. It isn't about not having insurance and suddenly going out to buy it....it is frequently used to drop someone because their condition was congenital. So you have cystic fibrosis and it wasn't diagnosed for years...now that they know they say "Ah, that is a pre-existing condition" and even though you've been insured for 20 years they try to weasel their way out of coverage.

Covering kids on their parents policy until 26 is likewise, not a problem.

Eliminating recision was also a good idea.

I don't like the fact that my liability for employee insurance after 2017 is pretty much unknown. I'd like for them to enact some kind of safety net for business.
There is a lot to discuss here. But first things first. Do you believe being able to shop for services and products reduces prices? Are prices important? And if they are what does rationally reduce prices other than consumers being able to shop?
 
Last edited:

ElGringo

Mayor
1. Up until obamacare buying health insurance was voluntary too.
True but requiring medical care was not then and is not now "voluntary", everyone needs it. I agree with you on the PPACA, the individual mandate is a horrible idea.

2. You can wish in one hand and have shit in the other as far as single payer goes.
Flashback to 1993: You can wish in one hand and have shit in the other as far as national health care goes. How did that argument work out?

Abortion in Roe v. Wade was largely determined on the right to privacy; exactly where did that right to privacy go when obamacare came along?
Privacy regarding her body and it wasn't determined to be absolute and while you may think it's a good idea to contrast an invasive medical procedure with a mandatory business relationship I don't see the relevance.
 

Arkady

President
THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE PLAN AS IT SHOULD BE.

To save the quality of our healthcare and expand coverage we need to change our insurance paradigm. No longer should insurance cover regular, urgent, or mild chronic care. The only insurance people should be able to purchase should be emergency and catastrophic coverage. People should be able to pay out of pocket for much of the healthcare they receive. To do so we need a new Health Savings Account (H.S.A.) paradigm. People should be able to put a dollar into an H.S.A. completely tax free. In other words if I made $50,000 this fiscal year and put $8,000 into my H.S.A., then my income taxes should start being calculated at $42,000. Whatever my employer contributes to my H.S.A. should also be completely tax free and that H.S.A. should be a lifetime right.

In exchange for that tax right I should NOT be able to spend that $8,000 on any other thing other than actual healthcare or health insurance coverage (i.e. emergency/catastrophic insurance). That $8,000 is now in a new and separate marketplace – one reserved for healthcare related purchases only – never to be taken out for any other reason than for medical need. It would be a debit card system with HSA funds only that would accumulate over the years. This solves our national healthcare problems period.

THE DETAILS

Truly, the devil is in the details and so it should be stated that Medicaid, Medicare, and the VA should continue to exist but changed to reflect the new healthcare paradigm. The government should subsidize H.S.A. accounts for the poor, the retired, and veterans while providing for the emergency/catastrophic healthcare insurance (and services). VA hospitals should not be closed.

Insurance premiums should be legally tied to preventative medical care such as regular checkups, blood tests, measured fitness scores…. If you have checkups, blood tests, good fitness scores for your age group, and/or a good track record for managing your existing ailments, then your premiums should be less than for those who do not have better life long health practices.

Monies in the healthcare market (i.e. in Health Saving Accounts) should be freely transferable from one HSA account to another HSA account without any kind of penalty. This would allow families to take care of each others’ healthcare costs and expedite securely charity donations. As long as the money is spent in the healthcare market everybody will benefit from this provision.

All healthcare providers should be required to post all healthcare costs on the internet for the purposes to enable shopping for healthcare services. The difference in healthcare services will then reflect the quality of care being provided. This is one benefit of shopping for services. The other benefit to shopping for healthcare is that fraud will drop drastically when the shopper’s own finite allowance for healthcare is on the line.

Today the U.S. subsidizes the healthcare of other advanced nations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and countries Europe. Our drugs cost less in those countries than they do here. In Switzerland the government mandates their drug manufacturing industry to charge less than cost and are then needing to charge those outside of Switzerland much more than cost plus profit. Why are we subsidizing socialized medicine in these countries? Enough is enough.

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) needs to be repealed. Physicians once again need to be given their constitutional rights back to create and run practices as ongoing business concerns. Businesses like dentistry, cosmetic surgery, and lasik eye surgery have generally not been paid for by health insurance companies and they are yet thriving businesses. Freeing the entire medical field and putting purchasing choices in the hands of consumers will increase the numbers covered and increase the quality of care.

Tax free Health Savings Accounts are the ultimate in healthcare transportability plans period. They cross state lines without any problem whatsoever and do not infringe on privacy rights the government would get rid of.

For every one hundred new cases of people with pre-existing conditions (every fiscal year) the insurance industry should be required to enroll 70 of them into one of their plans. Insurance companies will then compete via price for these patients/clients with pre-existing conditions. They will be looking and competing for the least sick of these individuals. The remaining 30 of 100 should be then placed on some Medicaid program tailored for their needs and circumstances.

If someone earns $10 million and puts $5 million into his or her Health Saving Account tax free, that is fine. That money can’t be spent on anything else but healthcare, will be used instead of others’ tax money, and will drive medical discoveries. Steve Jobs’ medical issues were paid for by him and any new discoveries will eventually be shared by all and at a lower cost.

Health discoveries earned in part or in whole on the public dime (at the State or Federal level) that lead to new or better healthcare products should earn their fair share of revenue that should be funneled into the Medicaid-Medicare-VA system. If a discovery was 50% funded by government, then government should earn 50% of the profits for as long as a patent is held.

Taxing medical devices to lower healthcare prices and increase coverage is an oxymoron that needs to be repealed and I guess has been but needs to be permanently taken off the table as viable idea.

A new, licensed profession of Healthcare Advisor should be established to advocate for and help citizens navigate through their healthcare decisions should they decide they such help.

I, the undersigned citizen, support this alternative and petition for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Signature: Date:
Address:

Please sign and send to your Federal representatives. Ask your friends and family to do so too.
I'm a practical guy. So, my first question is going to be "what evidence do we have that this will produce good results?" There are about three dozen countries around the world with better healthcare systems than ours, in terms of costing significantly less per capita and producing significantly better public health outcomes. Did any of them succeed with a reform of the type you're urging? When we have at least three dozen tested, real-world examples to learn from, I see no reason to be trying to reinvent the wheel. That strikes me as both wasteful and pointlessly risky. So, which nation, in particular, has tried the reform you're talking about with good results?
 

Arkady

President
THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE PLAN AS IT SHOULD BE.

To save the quality of our healthcare and expand coverage we need to change our insurance paradigm. No longer should insurance cover regular, urgent, or mild chronic care. The only insurance people should be able to purchase should be emergency and catastrophic coverage. People should be able to pay out of pocket for much of the healthcare they receive. To do so we need a new Health Savings Account (H.S.A.) paradigm. People should be able to put a dollar into an H.S.A. completely tax free. In other words if I made $50,000 this fiscal year and put $8,000 into my H.S.A., then my income taxes should start being calculated at $42,000. Whatever my employer contributes to my H.S.A. should also be completely tax free and that H.S.A. should be a lifetime right.

In exchange for that tax right I should NOT be able to spend that $8,000 on any other thing other than actual healthcare or health insurance coverage (i.e. emergency/catastrophic insurance). That $8,000 is now in a new and separate marketplace – one reserved for healthcare related purchases only – never to be taken out for any other reason than for medical need. It would be a debit card system with HSA funds only that would accumulate over the years. This solves our national healthcare problems period.

THE DETAILS

Truly, the devil is in the details and so it should be stated that Medicaid, Medicare, and the VA should continue to exist but changed to reflect the new healthcare paradigm. The government should subsidize H.S.A. accounts for the poor, the retired, and veterans while providing for the emergency/catastrophic healthcare insurance (and services). VA hospitals should not be closed.

Insurance premiums should be legally tied to preventative medical care such as regular checkups, blood tests, measured fitness scores…. If you have checkups, blood tests, good fitness scores for your age group, and/or a good track record for managing your existing ailments, then your premiums should be less than for those who do not have better life long health practices.

Monies in the healthcare market (i.e. in Health Saving Accounts) should be freely transferable from one HSA account to another HSA account without any kind of penalty. This would allow families to take care of each others’ healthcare costs and expedite securely charity donations. As long as the money is spent in the healthcare market everybody will benefit from this provision.

All healthcare providers should be required to post all healthcare costs on the internet for the purposes to enable shopping for healthcare services. The difference in healthcare services will then reflect the quality of care being provided. This is one benefit of shopping for services. The other benefit to shopping for healthcare is that fraud will drop drastically when the shopper’s own finite allowance for healthcare is on the line.

Today the U.S. subsidizes the healthcare of other advanced nations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and countries Europe. Our drugs cost less in those countries than they do here. In Switzerland the government mandates their drug manufacturing industry to charge less than cost and are then needing to charge those outside of Switzerland much more than cost plus profit. Why are we subsidizing socialized medicine in these countries? Enough is enough.

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) needs to be repealed. Physicians once again need to be given their constitutional rights back to create and run practices as ongoing business concerns. Businesses like dentistry, cosmetic surgery, and lasik eye surgery have generally not been paid for by health insurance companies and they are yet thriving businesses. Freeing the entire medical field and putting purchasing choices in the hands of consumers will increase the numbers covered and increase the quality of care.

Tax free Health Savings Accounts are the ultimate in healthcare transportability plans period. They cross state lines without any problem whatsoever and do not infringe on privacy rights the government would get rid of.

For every one hundred new cases of people with pre-existing conditions (every fiscal year) the insurance industry should be required to enroll 70 of them into one of their plans. Insurance companies will then compete via price for these patients/clients with pre-existing conditions. They will be looking and competing for the least sick of these individuals. The remaining 30 of 100 should be then placed on some Medicaid program tailored for their needs and circumstances.

If someone earns $10 million and puts $5 million into his or her Health Saving Account tax free, that is fine. That money can’t be spent on anything else but healthcare, will be used instead of others’ tax money, and will drive medical discoveries. Steve Jobs’ medical issues were paid for by him and any new discoveries will eventually be shared by all and at a lower cost.

Health discoveries earned in part or in whole on the public dime (at the State or Federal level) that lead to new or better healthcare products should earn their fair share of revenue that should be funneled into the Medicaid-Medicare-VA system. If a discovery was 50% funded by government, then government should earn 50% of the profits for as long as a patent is held.

Taxing medical devices to lower healthcare prices and increase coverage is an oxymoron that needs to be repealed and I guess has been but needs to be permanently taken off the table as viable idea.

A new, licensed profession of Healthcare Advisor should be established to advocate for and help citizens navigate through their healthcare decisions should they decide they such help.

I, the undersigned citizen, support this alternative and petition for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Signature: Date:
Address:

Please sign and send to your Federal representatives. Ask your friends and family to do so too.
Just one other quick note. I have a health care account through work that I can put pre-tax money into for certain health expenditures. It's wildly inefficient. I need to try to guess, before the year starts, what healthcare needs will come up during the year, which is impossible. If I guess too little, I lose some of the money. If I guess too much, I wind up making all sorts of inefficient purchases at the end of the year just to use up the money. I still have several enormous bottles of aspirin I bought years back, because I needed to spend my excess healthcare savings by year-end or lose them, and I read aspirin doesn't go bad. I suppose that sometime before I die, I'll use that purchase up, but it sure would have been better if I hadn't pre-purchased decades of medicine simply due to a dumb tax law. It's an absurd waste.
 

Arkady

President
THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE PLAN AS IT SHOULD BE.

To save the quality of our healthcare and expand coverage we need to change our insurance paradigm. No longer should insurance cover regular, urgent, or mild chronic care. The only insurance people should be able to purchase should be emergency and catastrophic coverage. People should be able to pay out of pocket for much of the healthcare they receive. To do so we need a new Health Savings Account (H.S.A.) paradigm. People should be able to put a dollar into an H.S.A. completely tax free. In other words if I made $50,000 this fiscal year and put $8,000 into my H.S.A., then my income taxes should start being calculated at $42,000. Whatever my employer contributes to my H.S.A. should also be completely tax free and that H.S.A. should be a lifetime right.

In exchange for that tax right I should NOT be able to spend that $8,000 on any other thing other than actual healthcare or health insurance coverage (i.e. emergency/catastrophic insurance). That $8,000 is now in a new and separate marketplace – one reserved for healthcare related purchases only – never to be taken out for any other reason than for medical need. It would be a debit card system with HSA funds only that would accumulate over the years. This solves our national healthcare problems period.

THE DETAILS

Truly, the devil is in the details and so it should be stated that Medicaid, Medicare, and the VA should continue to exist but changed to reflect the new healthcare paradigm. The government should subsidize H.S.A. accounts for the poor, the retired, and veterans while providing for the emergency/catastrophic healthcare insurance (and services). VA hospitals should not be closed.

Insurance premiums should be legally tied to preventative medical care such as regular checkups, blood tests, measured fitness scores…. If you have checkups, blood tests, good fitness scores for your age group, and/or a good track record for managing your existing ailments, then your premiums should be less than for those who do not have better life long health practices.

Monies in the healthcare market (i.e. in Health Saving Accounts) should be freely transferable from one HSA account to another HSA account without any kind of penalty. This would allow families to take care of each others’ healthcare costs and expedite securely charity donations. As long as the money is spent in the healthcare market everybody will benefit from this provision.

All healthcare providers should be required to post all healthcare costs on the internet for the purposes to enable shopping for healthcare services. The difference in healthcare services will then reflect the quality of care being provided. This is one benefit of shopping for services. The other benefit to shopping for healthcare is that fraud will drop drastically when the shopper’s own finite allowance for healthcare is on the line.

Today the U.S. subsidizes the healthcare of other advanced nations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and countries Europe. Our drugs cost less in those countries than they do here. In Switzerland the government mandates their drug manufacturing industry to charge less than cost and are then needing to charge those outside of Switzerland much more than cost plus profit. Why are we subsidizing socialized medicine in these countries? Enough is enough.

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) needs to be repealed. Physicians once again need to be given their constitutional rights back to create and run practices as ongoing business concerns. Businesses like dentistry, cosmetic surgery, and lasik eye surgery have generally not been paid for by health insurance companies and they are yet thriving businesses. Freeing the entire medical field and putting purchasing choices in the hands of consumers will increase the numbers covered and increase the quality of care.

Tax free Health Savings Accounts are the ultimate in healthcare transportability plans period. They cross state lines without any problem whatsoever and do not infringe on privacy rights the government would get rid of.

For every one hundred new cases of people with pre-existing conditions (every fiscal year) the insurance industry should be required to enroll 70 of them into one of their plans. Insurance companies will then compete via price for these patients/clients with pre-existing conditions. They will be looking and competing for the least sick of these individuals. The remaining 30 of 100 should be then placed on some Medicaid program tailored for their needs and circumstances.

If someone earns $10 million and puts $5 million into his or her Health Saving Account tax free, that is fine. That money can’t be spent on anything else but healthcare, will be used instead of others’ tax money, and will drive medical discoveries. Steve Jobs’ medical issues were paid for by him and any new discoveries will eventually be shared by all and at a lower cost.

Health discoveries earned in part or in whole on the public dime (at the State or Federal level) that lead to new or better healthcare products should earn their fair share of revenue that should be funneled into the Medicaid-Medicare-VA system. If a discovery was 50% funded by government, then government should earn 50% of the profits for as long as a patent is held.

Taxing medical devices to lower healthcare prices and increase coverage is an oxymoron that needs to be repealed and I guess has been but needs to be permanently taken off the table as viable idea.

A new, licensed profession of Healthcare Advisor should be established to advocate for and help citizens navigate through their healthcare decisions should they decide they such help.

I, the undersigned citizen, support this alternative and petition for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Signature: Date:
Address:

Please sign and send to your Federal representatives. Ask your friends and family to do so too.
Also, with regard to freely transferable tax-advantaged HSA's the problem is so obvious I'm surprised I have to point it out. Let's say I'm a rich guy and pay 35% marginal rates. And let's say you're one of the roughly half of all Americans who pay no taxes, because your earnings are so low. So, I put $1000 in to my account, saving me $350 in taxes. Then I can sell you a transfer of that $1000 to your account, for your use, in exchange for, say, $800. It's like $200 in free money for you, and for me, I've got $800 rather than the $650 I'd have had if I'd just taken taxes on the money rather than laundering it through your healthcare, so it's $150 in "free money" for me, too. Meanwhile, the government is getting $350 less in revenues than they should have -- money other taxpayers have to make up. It makes our system more complicated, less efficient, and less progressive.
 
Top