New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Abortionist brags - I Cut Unborn Babies’ Cords So They Can’t Scream

spyydrr

Council Member
What about ALL of America's children?
Republicans care about fetuses and don't give a damn about OUR children after they're born.
That's simply not true. There are numerous charitable organizations, particularly run by the Catholic Church, which will offer services and adoption to unwanted children.
Killing kids, which is what many on the left do, is done mostly out of convenience, because the woman either failed to use protective measures and was irresponsible in her actions. How about teaching kids to be more responsible? There are adults too, who should learn that lesson.
 

EatTheRich

President
Clearly she's proud of that 10%.

If the Holocaust only killed 10% of what it did would you be happy?
Does she even perform late-term abortions ... which are usually medically mandatory? Probably not.

Keeping an insensate fetus from developing into a person is very different from killing a person ... pretending they are the same, especially with reference to the Holocaust, shows a disgusting lack of humanity.
 

EatTheRich

President
(1) would those gun laws stopped the kid in Pa from using a knife?
(2) libs love Hitler
(3) tide pods eaters
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/school-walkout-unity-also-lays-bare-division-among-students/ar-BBKlnvM?ocid=spartandhp

your little bi-sexual motor mouth admitted they bullied Cruz

street racers in Cali killing more kids than GUNS at school!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-la-county-illegal-street-racing-has-a-deadly-toll/ar-BBKl3sG?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
This is a sign of true adoration. You went and looked up my past posts that pertain to guns. Thank you so much. (snicker).
My grandson was NOT using a gun at 18 years old. He took a gun safety class at 18 years old because it was required by his employer. He did buy a Glock 17 when he was 19 years old, but it was registered in his Dad's name and his Dad kept it for him. When he turned 21 years old he was able to register the gun in his name and he keeps it now himself. He has a permit to carry it and he is a very mature, responsible young man. And he has never had to use his gun, ever.
2015="my grandsons have guns"
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
See how easy it is to go around gun laws? HAHAHAHA He bought it at 19--not 21. Did you say you were intelligent?
in his Dads name.......I'm sure that is possibly illegal, especially in Cali

2014 daughter and SIL were home for Christmas and Wal-Mart had a Christmas sale on AR's, but, SIL was sick, real sick, so me and my daughter went to buy him one for Christmas.........daughter told clerk what she wanted and when ask if it was for her she said no for my husband......HELLO......she said she couldn't sell her the gun if it wasn't for her, so, I said I'll buy it.....HELLO..........NO, I couldn't buy it either because daughter had said it was for her husband............I'm sure Cali is much stricter than NC......HELLO

Appears she posted an illegal gun sale on the net!
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
The NRA is about gun safety, responsibility and protecting our Constitutional rights. No NRA member has ever endorsed gun violence, nor have they participated in mass shooting. Most gun violence in this country is suicidal.

The NRA has become the whipping boy for leftists, but the truth is, it's a very good organization and almost 20% of our POTUS have been members.

As far as I am aware, the NRA has offered to train teachers how to responsibly use guns and that could be a big plus for our children.
If the Democrats truly cared about kids in schools, they would be actively working to stop shootings, instead of focusing on guns.

The next mass shooter is out there. He may already be armed. What gun laws are going to stop him?? But, a person in the school could.
Laws didn't stop the school knife attack in Pa.............libs don't think clear
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
He bought it at 19 years old, but it wasn't in his name and he didn't have access to it. So, he wasn't going around the gun law. He understood that he wouldn't be able to put the gun in his name until he was 21 years old and he was fine with that.
What's interesting is that he could have bought an AR15 when he was 18 years old in his own name and had access to it immediately. Strange how the gun laws work.
Yes, I did say I was intelligent. Thank you for being a fan.:)
lanza that shot up school didn't have access to a gun until he killed his mother and got in the gun safe.........(what was the number of dead-21)

You just put your grandsons and their dads neck in a noose on the internet.........not very intelligent!
 

Charcat

One of the Patsy's
lanza that shot up school didn't have access to a gun until he killed his mother and got in the gun safe.........(what was the number of dead-21)

You just put your grandsons and their dads neck in a noose on the internet.........not very intelligent!
Exactly. LOL Actually bragging about it, and too dumb to realize she is describing an illegal act. Especially breaking gun laws. TOO FUNNY.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Exactly. LOL Actually bragging about it, and too dumb to realize she is describing an illegal act. Especially breaking gun laws. TOO FUNNY.
libs hate GUNs unless it's their grand-kids GUNs..........amazing...........
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
And it's okay to buy a gun illegally...if it's your grandson. Still can't believe she thinks she's intelligent.
yep...........and even posted the crime on the internet! That's far from 'intellegent'

Who in Cali uses the word "ain't"
 

Sunset Rose

Mayor
Supporting Member
"Minimum Age for sales and transfers: California prohibits any person, corporation or firm from selling a handgun to anyone under 21 years of age and from selling, loaning, or transferring any firearm to a minor. This prohibition does not apply in certain scenarios, including the sale of a handgun that is an antique firearm to a person at least 18 years old, and the transfer or loan of a long gun to a minor by the minor's parent or legal guardian. Minor refers to a person who is under 18 years old."
"Minimum age for possession: California law prohibits minors from possessing a handgun. Exceptions to this prohibition include situations where a parent or legal guardian is present or has consented to the possession. In addition, minors may, with the consent of a parent or legal guardian, possess handguns when engaged in certain recreational sports.
There is no minimum age to possess rifles and shotguns."

I hope these gun laws from the state of California will clear things up for a few posters here who think they know everything. Sorry, I haven't gotten my grandson or his Dad in trouble. (Were you hoping that?) They didn't break any laws.
 

spyydrr

Council Member
"Minimum Age for sales and transfers: California prohibits any person, corporation or firm from selling a handgun to anyone under 21 years of age and from selling, loaning, or transferring any firearm to a minor. This prohibition does not apply in certain scenarios, including the sale of a handgun that is an antique firearm to a person at least 18 years old, and the transfer or loan of a long gun to a minor by the minor's parent or legal guardian. Minor refers to a person who is under 18 years old."
"Minimum age for possession: California law prohibits minors from possessing a handgun. Exceptions to this prohibition include situations where a parent or legal guardian is present or has consented to the possession. In addition, minors may, with the consent of a parent or legal guardian, possess handguns when engaged in certain recreational sports.
There is no minimum age to possess rifles and shotguns."

I hope these gun laws from the state of California will clear things up for a few posters here who think they know everything. Sorry, I haven't gotten my grandson or his Dad in trouble. (Were you hoping that?) They didn't break any laws.

I think many of us know about the People's Republic of California, and the many loony tunes running the state. California was once a great state, but now it's another socialistic sicko state, where Californians are fleeing, to get away from the high taxes and more and more regulations.
A boy who goes hunting with his dad, ought to be able to buy a hunting rifle. Period. The state elitist have no concept about what is right and wrong. They actually are under the delusion that if you raise the raise, it translates into fewer gun shooting. They apparently are unaware that many good young men and women have served in our military, starting at the age of 18, and many of them have a gun to use against America's enemies, while they served. In other words, they are responsible citizens, and should be allowed to purchase a gun.
 

Charcat

One of the Patsy's
"Minimum Age for sales and transfers: California prohibits any person, corporation or firm from selling a handgun to anyone under 21 years of age and from selling, loaning, or transferring any firearm to a minor. This prohibition does not apply in certain scenarios, including the sale of a handgun that is an antique firearm to a person at least 18 years old, and the transfer or loan of a long gun to a minor by the minor's parent or legal guardian. Minor refers to a person who is under 18 years old."
"Minimum age for possession: California law prohibits minors from possessing a handgun. Exceptions to this prohibition include situations where a parent or legal guardian is present or has consented to the possession. In addition, minors may, with the consent of a parent or legal guardian, possess handguns when engaged in certain recreational sports.
There is no minimum age to possess rifles and shotguns."

I hope these gun laws from the state of California will clear things up for a few posters here who think they know everything. Sorry, I haven't gotten my grandson or his Dad in trouble. (Were you hoping that?) They didn't break any laws.
"Straw purchases are one of the main ways that criminals acquire firearms, they’re illegal, and you need to know what they are, so that you don’t become involved in one yourself.

A straw purchase is one in which one Person “A” buys a firearm for Person “B”, at Person “B’s” request. They’re illegal, because criminals and other people who cannot pass a background check often get other people, who can pass a background check, to buy guns for them. Or, Person “A” may get Person “B” to buy the gun so that Person “A” won’t have his name alongside the make, model and serial number of a gun on the Federal Form 4473 that documents every firearm purchased from a federal licensed firearm dealer (FFL)."
https://www.nrablog.com/articles/2016/7/buying-and-selling-firearms-part-6-straw-purchases/

From the same article:
"The buyer must fill out a form called a Federal Firearms Transaction Record Part 1 – Over the Counter, otherwise known as an ATF Form 4473. Among other things, the 4473 requires the buyer to answer questions that verify the buyer’s eligibility to purchase a firearm. The first question, 11a, relates to straw purchases.

Are you the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm(s) listed on this form? Warning: You are not the actual buyer if you are acquiring the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not the actual buyer, the dealer cannot transfer the firearm(s) to you. (See Instructions for Question 11.a.) Exception: If you are picking up a repaired firearm(s) for another person, you are not required to answer 11.a. and may proceed to question 11.b.

If you answer “yes” to this question, the sale cannot proceed. If you answer “no,” you are stating under penalty of law that you are not buying the firearm for someone else, other than as a bona fide gift. Answering “yes” when the truthful answer is “no” is a federal felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine."

From your post: "
This prohibition does not apply in certain scenarios, including the sale of a handgun that is an antique firearm to a person at least 18 years old,
and the transfer or loan of a long gun to a minor by the minor's parent or legal guardian. "

A Glock 17 is neither an antique nor a long gun.
 

Charcat

One of the Patsy's
"Minimum Age for sales and transfers: California prohibits any person, corporation or firm from selling a handgun to anyone under 21 years of age and from selling, loaning, or transferring any firearm to a minor. This prohibition does not apply in certain scenarios, including the sale of a handgun that is an antique firearm to a person at least 18 years old, and the transfer or loan of a long gun to a minor by the minor's parent or legal guardian. Minor refers to a person who is under 18 years old."
"Minimum age for possession: California law prohibits minors from possessing a handgun. Exceptions to this prohibition include situations where a parent or legal guardian is present or has consented to the possession. In addition, minors may, with the consent of a parent or legal guardian, possess handguns when engaged in certain recreational sports.
There is no minimum age to possess rifles and shotguns."

I hope these gun laws from the state of California will clear things up for a few posters here who think they know everything. Sorry, I haven't gotten my grandson or his Dad in trouble. (Were you hoping that?) They didn't break any laws.
By the way, I don't care how many guns your grandson owns. Just be careful what you say. Your questioning about gun laws reeks of hypocrisy--especially when your grandson got his gun in an illegal way. In most cases, people who do this get away with it. That is how so many people who shouldn't be allowed to have a gun get them.

As long as your grandson doesn't get in any kind of trouble with his gun, it should be all right. BUT....your son will pay the price as well if he should.
 

Sunset Rose

Mayor
Supporting Member
I think many of us know about the People's Republic of California, and the many loony tunes running the state. California was once a great state, but now it's another socialistic sicko state, where Californians are fleeing, to get away from the high taxes and more and more regulations.
A boy who goes hunting with his dad, ought to be able to buy a hunting rifle. Period. The state elitist have no concept about what is right and wrong. They actually are under the delusion that if you raise the raise, it translates into fewer gun shooting. They apparently are unaware that many good young men and women have served in our military, starting at the age of 18, and many of them have a gun to use against America's enemies, while they served. In other words, they are responsible citizens, and should be allowed to purchase a gun.
I was surprized to learn that an 18 year old can buy a rifle or AR15, but can't buy a handgun. Seems like it should be the other way around.
I see nothing wrong with kids using guns under the supervision of an adult, such as to go hunting. I was talking to a man on another site who said that his 18 year old son had his own AR15 with several hundred rounds of ammunition for it. I hope his son is a mature minded guy.
As for people fleeing California, that's good. I hope they find happiness. California is still a great state in my opinion, I'm not planning to leave.:)
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
By the way, I don't care how many guns your grandson owns. Just be careful what you say. Your questioning about gun laws reeks of hypocrisy--especially when your grandson got his gun in an illegal way. In most cases, people who do this get away with it. That is how so many people who shouldn't be allowed to have a gun get them.

As long as your grandson doesn't get in any kind of trouble with his gun, it should be all right. BUT....your son will pay the price as well if he should.
GUN registered to Daddy..........kid gets drunk or stoned and just wants to bust off a few rounds with the gun he bought.........shoots through neighbors home by accident, kills 6 year old.............daddy got a world of problems ..........

IMO......Sunset "ain't' got no grandkids, YET.................dig
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
I was surprized to learn that an 18 year old can buy a rifle or AR15, but can't buy a handgun. Seems like it should be the other way around.
I see nothing wrong with kids using guns under the supervision of an adult, such as to go hunting. I was talking to a man on another site who said that his 18 year old son had his own AR15 with several hundred rounds of ammunition for it. I hope his son is a mature minded guy.
As for people fleeing California, that's good. I hope they find happiness. California is still a great state in my opinion, I'm not planning to leave.:)
Eh, a AR15 is a rifle...........no OR 2 it..........like a female with make-up on.....wear it off of them and they not as pretty as before, but, still a female! Try hiding a rifle in ya drawers......impossible, but, ya can a handgun.....dig

18 is not a KID.........unless parents are stupid.......

How big a tent ya got? After you posted of illegal gun sales, you going to regret it.
 
Top