New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Adam Schiff Pressured Witness To Change His Story & Accuse Trump

Bugsy McGurk

President
Under oath, Nope. You stick to the facts- as we all know Schiff can't do.

Schiff tried to trick him and got played for the doofus he is.
The routine use of hypothetical questions to test witnesses’ credibility seems to come as a surprise to you wingers. Interesting.

But your ignorance aside, Schiff posing a hypothetical question is still not “trying to get the witness to lie.”
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
The routine use of hypothetical questions to test witnesses’ credibility seems to come as a surprise to you wingers. Interesting.

But your ignorance aside, Schiff posing a hypothetical question is still not “trying to get the witness to lie.”
Sane people prefer reality.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
The routine use of hypothetical questions to test witnesses’ credibility seems to come as a surprise to you wingers. Interesting.

But your ignorance aside, Schiff posing a hypothetical question is still not “trying to get the witness to lie.”
lol Deposition 101:
Don't answer compound or hypothetical questions.

Again, Schiff tried, and got punked.
 

Nostra

Governor
And that answer was the dodge. The question was hypothetical
No, it wasn't. And there is no place for "hypothetical" questions in a hearing that is suppose to be looking at facts. Schiff thinks this thing can be conducted as if it is a fairy tale............oh wait, it is.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Questions in a hearing should be asked to determine the facts, nothing else.
The fact Schiff was trying to establish is that it’s improper for a president to shake down another country by telling its leader that harm will be visited upon them unless they help the president achieve his unrelated, corrupt political ends.

That’s an easy question for honest patriots to answer, but the witness was evading it to protect Trump.
 

Nostra

Governor
The fact Schiff was trying to establish is that it’s improper for a president to shake down another country by telling its leader that harm will be visited upon them unless they help the president achieve his unrelated, corrupt political ends.

That’s an easy question for honest patriots to answer, but the witness was evading it to protect Trump.
That didn't happen. Just more fairy tales from Schifferbrains to fool the Dimwinger window licking base.

It worked on you.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
That's why the meth head had to apologize for his fairy tale.:D
Three lies in a 12 word sentence...

1. Meth head
2. He “apologized” for a
3. “Fairy tale”

For “bonus dishonesty,” you edited my post in your reply.

Simply deplorable.
 
Top