Bugsy McGurk
President
About the same as we pay now. I would be surprised if the actual cost were not lower.
But wingers don’t analyze things like that. They just screech “$32 trillion! Where are we gonna get $32 trillion?”
;-)
About the same as we pay now. I would be surprised if the actual cost were not lower.
Kirsten Gillibrand and Paul Ryan would be examples of good people who are qualified for office. Not Cortez or Trump.And where do you think the bar should be?
Cortez has all the qualifications of Paul Ryan when he was first elected.Kirsten Gillibrand and Paul Ryan would be examples of good people who are qualified for office. Not Cortez or Trump.
Why isn’t Cortez qualified?Kirsten Gillibrand and Paul Ryan would be examples of good people who are qualified for office. Not Cortez or Trump.
Bartender and the crazy trump like things she says shows she doesn't even understand real life or government.Why isn’t Cortez qualified?
NotCortez has all the qualifications of Paul Ryan when he was first elected.
She’s disqualified because she was a bartender? You can’t actually believe that.Bartender and the crazy trump like things she says shows she doesn't even understand real life or government.
She’s disqualified because she was a bartender? You can’t actually believe that.
What “Trump like things” has she said?
As you know I didn't say she was disqualified. I said that I preferred more qualified candidates.She’s disqualified because she was a bartender? You can’t actually believe that.
What “Trump like things” has she said?
She admitted she misspoke about that. She’s young and learning. She’s going to make mistakes.Fact Checker Analysis
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s $21 trillion mistake
By Salvador Rizzo
December 4, 2018
“$21 TRILLION of Pentagon financial transactions ‘could not be traced, documented, or explained.’ $21T in Pentagon accounting errors. Medicare for All costs ~$32T. That means 66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.”
— Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), in a tweet, Dec. 2, 2018
The Defense Department is awash with money. So much money that neither the staff nor 1,200 auditors could make sense of where it all went. (The Pentagon recently failed its first big audit in history.)
Enter Ocasio-Cortez. She supports expanding Medicare to people under 65, what’s known as single-payer or Medicare-for-all. But the big question is how to pay for all that health care. According to an estimate from the Urban Institute, the price tag on Sen. Bernie Sanders’s Medicare-for-all proposal would be $32 trillion over 10 years.
ADVERTISING
Maybe the Pentagon has a few trillion dollars lying around somewhere, as Ocasio-Cortez implied? Let’s find out.
The Facts
Ocasio-Cortez claimed on Twitter that $21 trillion in “Pentagon accounting errors” could have paid for 66 percent of the Medicare-for-all proposal. Her tweet references an article in the Nation, a left-leaning magazine. The specific line about the missing $21 trillion comes from research by Mark Skidmore, an economics professor at Michigan State University.
https://www.politifact.com/personalities/alexandria-ocasio-cortez/statements/?list=speaker
The reason I linked to her interview is because it demonstrates beyond doubt that she is a bright, extremely passionate legislator. You should watch it. Of course, the right wing hate machine, which identifies Dem rising stars and hates on them, has falsely depicted her as an idiotic floozy. Those interested in the truth should watch the video.As you know I didn't say she was disqualified. I said that I preferred more qualified candidates.
Nice spin.
I can't believe Bugsy is even going so low as to defend Ocasio. A new low for your Bugs.
as you libs did PalinThe reason I linked to her interview is because it demonstrates beyond doubt that she is a bright, extremely passionate legislator. You should watch it. Of course, the right wing hate machine, which identifies Dem rising stars and hates on them, has falsely depicted her as an idiotic floozy. Those interested in the truth should watch the video.
Yeah, Palin came across as so bright in her interviews.as you libs did Palin
whataboutism
not all of US are deep swamp socialists thats how.With Trump as president how can you ask that question with a straight face?
So you have low expectations and think it's greatThe interview was the first time the American public heard from her at any length. Thus far, most of her coverage has consisted of right wingers trying to depict her as an intellectual lightweight/wannabe.
As always though, the right wingers have been lying and misleading. AOC is impressive in so many ways. Watch the interview to decide for yourself...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-the-rookie-congresswoman-challenging-the-democratic-establishment-60-minutes-interview-full-transcript-2019-01-06/
So tell me how do you pay for healthcare for all? without killing the economy?That’s just a dumbass label wingers attach to her so they can avoid addressing any specifics.
Let me know if you’re up to addressing the specifics of what she said.
Insurance premiums.....something....something....So tell me how do you pay for healthcare for all? without killing the economy?
healthcare for all there is no insurance premiumsInsurance premiums.....something....something....
You and I both know that....but he keeps bringing them up, yet denies he wants to natiinalize the insurance industry.healthcare for all there is no insurance premiums
much brighter than CortezYeah, Palin came across as so bright in her interviews.
;-)