EatTheRich
President
Carter signed the CRA, which did not lead to the recession 30 years later (that would be absurd).Slicks CRA created the recession
Carter signed the CRA, which did not lead to the recession 30 years later (that would be absurd).Slicks CRA created the recession
I simply held up a mirror to your post. What you saw is what we see when we look at what you post...You start with “You mean like...” and then proceed to distort everything I said and sprinkle in lies.
Bottom line - we have had governmental policies since the 80’s lavishing the wealthy with more and more massive tax cuts and other economic advantages, and all we have seen is an exploding wealth gap and income stagnation for consumers.
Rather than confront that bottom line, you just drift off on one of your endless dissembling jags.
So you think every government policy implementation's immediate effects are the extent of and sum of all reactions and repercussions? That is, of course, absurd...Carter signed the CRA, which did not lead to the recession 30 years later (that would be absurd).
Very lame.I simply held up a mirror to your post. What you saw is what we see when we look at you...
No, I think that non-discrimination laws do not suddenly result in an acute credit bubble crashing 30 years later.So you think every government policy implementation's immediate effects are the extent of and sum of all reactions and repercussions? That is, of course, absurd...
I did - I pointed out the simple fact that you were projecting your failed ideology's, well, failures, onto your political opposition. I'm sorry you didn't get that, but nut cases like you who do "projection" would not (or you'd know how stupid it looks when you do it).Very lame.
Respond to my point if you can. You’re degenerating into being only a noisemaker, like so many of your winger colleagues here.
You mean like how capitalism fails immediately after it is implemented?No, I think that non-discrimination laws do not suddenly result in an acute credit bubble crashing 30 years later.
You mean like when capitalism was first introduced and along with it came Inquisitions, pogroms, and absolute monarchy?You mean like how capitalism fails immediately after it is implemented?
So you think the pre-capitalism barbarians were all super nice people? Your arguments refute themselves...You mean like when capitalism was first introduced and along with it came Inquisitions, pogroms, and absolute monarchy?
No you didn’t. You completely dodged my point. You babbled about me instead. As you know.I did - I pointed out the simple fact that you were projecting your failed ideology's, well, failures, onto your political opposition. I'm sorry you didn't get that, but nut cases like you who do "projection" would not (or you'd know how stupid it looks when you do it).
So the USSR cannot be considered a failure if it was preceded by some not-so-nice people?So you think the pre-capitalism barbarians were all super nice people? Your arguments refute themselves...
I merely pointed out how your "point" applied way more to your own ideology that that of your political opponents.No you didn’t. You completely dodged my point. You babbled about me instead. As you know.
Deplorable, as always.
Nah, you flat out dodged it and yapped about me. You made NO effort to refute what I said.I merely pointed out how your "point" applied way more to your own ideology that that of your political opponents.
The "obvious" is, well, obvious. And what is "obvious" is that what you said about Republicanism, is just as applicable to your preferred ideology (if nor more so).Nah, you flat out dodged it and yapped about me. You made NO effort to refute what I said.
Man up and stop denying the obvious.
Nope. The “Bottom line” in my post above, which launched you on your dodging jag, said not a thing about “Republicanism.”The "obvious" is, well, obvious. And what is "obvious" is that what you said about Republicanism, is just as applicable to your preferred ideology (if nor more so).
Slick expanded CRA and signed it...…...1993Carter signed the CRA, which did not lead to the recession 30 years later (that would be absurd).
Did you or did you not state:Nope. The “Bottom line” in my post above, which launched you on your dodging jag, said not a thing about “Republicanism.”
That was a very lame lie.