Why do you need talk to marvin for MV.........strangeWhy? What the hell do I care?
Why do you need talk to marvin for MV.........strangeWhy? What the hell do I care?
A "circus" is better than a plane crashNeither Clinton nor Sanders would have been a big departure from Obama. Trump was the candidate of those who wanted the circus.
"racist-------like speaking in black tongue when speaking to blacksThat would be a big departure from Obama, but I wouldn't say it's an honest characterization of Clinton and Sanders. Yes, Clinton showed open disdain for those who were racists, sexists, and homophobes ... but that's different from having that attitude toward anyone with a political difference of opinion.
maybe that's why he ask Phil to talk to you, broke English!Yes. Read it again and tell me if you really believe it says I think Hillary murdered political opponents. Your English is good for a Russian, but clearly you still need work.
YepSo she, and you, truly believe the 30+ million people she denounced, Himmler-like, as "irredeemable" are ALL racists, sexists, or homophobes?
https://stream.org/deplorable-election-over-instant-hillary-said-this-word/I don't. I can't speak for her. But obviously racism and sexism were high-profile features of Trump's campaign, which began with racist characterization of Mexicans more crude than we've seen from a mainstream contender since Buchanan and more crude than we've seen from an actual major-party nominee since Eisenhower ... and made sexist innuendo about Clinton into the major selling point of his campaign.
Wait ? So 20 yrs after the press going on about cigars in vaginas. You reach your limit with whether or not Trump had pants on when he solicited sex from a porn actress in an affair he publicly denied and has threatened lawsuits surrounding its disclosure to the voting public ?They asked if he had pants on. The transcripts of their coverage read like Penthouse Magazine, going well beyond facts discovery.
Who is the one deflecting here ? Never heard you say a word about press salaciousness during those intervening decades, not until your right wing leader has been caught with said, pants down by document disclosures.Your patent deflection is uninteresting and NO ONE will believe you about other matters as you throw down with such poor players.
Pathetic.
I don't believe I have ever said I hated Trump. I know who Trump is and the danger he represents. I am certainly bothered by the hypocritical defenses for Trump's behavior like this one. But I don't hate Trump. I tried to warn you people away from him. Now you try to blame him on the other side.I blame lefty parents for such terrible character formation. As I noted to Julie previously, if you guys hate Trump so much...why do you adopt so many of his behaviors and mimic his character?
I am convinced lefty just wants the lowest common denominator across society as a whole. You crave a cesspool.
I guess Trump is your man.
For one thing the people who wanted to expose it weren't lying about it, he was. His lying is what blew this thing up in the press. Remember, in presidential politics, it's always the cover up that lead to the downfall.He had affairs - if is true -years ago. Then someone wanted to drag it out right before the election. How is wanting to stifle it right before the election any different that the actions of the people who wanted to expose it? Each sides purpose was to swing the public opinion. Either that is wrong on both sides or its not.
Well, your side delivered Hillary as candidate (so terrible even Trump could beat her). The other side brought us Trump. I voted for Johnson.Wait ? So 20 yrs after the press going on about cigars in vaginas. You reach your limit with whether or not Trump had pants on when he solicited sex from a porn actress in an affair he publicly denied and has threatened lawsuits surrounding its disclosure to the voting public ?
Who is the one deflecting here ? Never heard you say a word about press salaciousness during those intervening decades, not until your right wing leader has been caught with said, pants down by document disclosures.
I don't believe I have ever said I hated Trump. I know who Trump is and the danger he represents. I am certainly bothered by the hypocritical defenses for Trump's behavior like this one. But I don't hate Trump. I tried to warn you people away from him. Now you try to blame him on the other side.
Why do you Trump defenders keep bringing up Hillary Clinton ? You did what you wanted to do despite the months of warnings about Trump. Now we have what your (all of you) actions brought about, and contribute to with your attempts to shift blame to those that tried to prevent this, Hillary and her voters included.Well, your side delivered Hillary as candidate (so terrible even Trump could beat her). The other side brought us Trump. I voted for Johnson.
That said, though, terrible conduct (of Trump or Bill Clinton) isn't the subject -- media jumping the shark is. They did not jump the shark when Clinton was using intern private parts in the Oval Office as his own personal humidor. They did go off the deep end in this current iteration of disgraceful president.
This cannot be argued otherwise. It simply did not happen before.
The alternative was worse. When will you get that?Elect a clown, complain about the circus ...
Act how? Tent revivals?It's downhill only unless the people act...
Your opinion. At least Clinton didn't call for a jihad against the Constitution and rule of law.The alternative was worse. When will you get that?
Trump is an SOB.
Yeah, but the other bitch was worse.
Say what you will about Trump but fvk off already.
BTW ... the Repblicans had the option of selecting any one of a dozen dignified, competent Republicans to run against Clinton ... but they preferred Trump.The alternative was worse. When will you get that?
Trump is an SOB.
Yeah, but the other bitch was worse.
Say what you will about Trump but fvk off already.
I don't understand...Why do you need talk to marvin for MV.........strange
Act to elect rationed, non polar adultsAct how? Tent revivals?
No matter how much sense says otherwise the majority of the voters still vote for the main parties -Itd be a start
Post #22I don't understand...
Unfortunately too many people prefer a dishonest illusion to the reality. When the truth is ugly only a lie can be beautiful.It is clear that everyone is tainted the minute they step into a job in Washington DC.
Do we really want to ruin a whole lot of (possibly) good people by sending them there?
I agree with @marvin martian that we aren't going to get past this by voting. We're probably not going to get past it at all.