New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Any WB Yeats fans out there? HEEEEEELP!!!

Bo-4

Senator
Another project i'm tryin' to help the kid with.. i do not agree with questioner's premise (at all)

Thanks in advance for any feedback! :confused:

===

In "The Second Coming" by W.B. Yeats, the speaker asserts that the best people "lack all conviction," while the worst are "full of passionate intensity." How does this statement apply to the speakers in "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death" and "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock"? What characteristics of the modern world make it difficult, if not impossible, to be heroic in the traditional sense?

-----

An Irish Airman foresees his Death


I KNOW that I shall meet my fate
Somewhere among the clouds above;
Those that I fight I do not hate
Those that I guard I do not love;
My country is Kiltartan Cross,
My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor,
No likely end could bring them loss
Or leave them happier than before.
Nor law, nor duty bade me fight,
Nor public man, nor cheering crowds,
A lonely impulse of delight
Drove to this tumult in the clouds;
I balanced all, brought all to mind,
The years to come seemed waste of breath,
A waste of breath the years behind 15
In balance with this life, this death.


The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock



LET us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against the sky
Like a patient etherized upon a table;
Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,
The muttering retreats
Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotels
And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells:
Streets that follow like a tedious argument
Of insidious intent
To lead you to an overwhelming question….
Oh, do not ask, “What is it?”
Let us go and make our visit.

In the room the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.

The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes,
The yellow smoke that rubs its muzzle on the window-panes
Licked its tongue into the corners of the evening,
Lingered upon the pools that stand in drains,
Let fall upon its back the soot that falls from chimneys,
Slipped by the terrace, made a sudden leap,
And seeing that it was a soft October night,
Curled once about the house, and fell asleep.

And indeed there will be time
For the yellow smoke that slides along the street,
Rubbing its back upon the window panes;
There will be time, there will be time
To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet;
There will be time to murder and create,
And time for all the works and days of hands
That lift and drop a question on your plate;
Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
And for a hundred visions and revisions,
Before the taking of a toast and tea.

In the room the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.

And indeed there will be time
To wonder, “Do I dare?” and, “Do I dare?”
Time to turn back and descend the stair,
With a bald spot in the middle of my hair—
(They will say: “How his hair is growing thin!”)
My morning coat, my collar mounting firmly to the chin,
My necktie rich and modest, but asserted by a simple pin—
(They will say: “But how his arms and legs are thin!”)
Do I dare
Disturb the universe?
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.

For I have known them all already, known them all:
Have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons,
I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;
I know the voices dying with a dying fall
Beneath the music from a farther room.
So how should I presume?

And I have known the eyes already, known them all—
The eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase,
And when I am formulated, sprawling on a pin,
When I am pinned and wriggling on the wall,
Then how should I begin
To spit out all the butt-ends of my days and ways?
And how should I presume?

And I have known the arms already, known them all—
Arms that are braceleted and white and bare
(But in the lamplight, downed with light brown hair!)
Is it perfume from a dress
That makes me so digress?
Arms that lie along a table, or wrap about a shawl.
And should I then presume?
And how should I begin?
. . . . . . . .
Shall I say, I have gone at dusk through narrow streets
And watched the smoke that rises from the pipes
Of lonely men in shirt-sleeves, leaning out of windows?…

I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.
. . . . . . . .
And the afternoon, the evening, sleeps so peacefully!
Smoothed by long fingers,
Asleep … tired … or it malingers,
Stretched on the floor, here beside you and me.
Should I, after tea and cakes and ices,
Have the strength to force the moment to its crisis?
But though I have wept and fasted, wept and prayed,
Though I have seen my head (grown slightly bald) brought in upon a platter,
I am no prophet—and here’s no great matter;
I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,
And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker,
And in short, I was afraid.

And would it have been worth it, after all,
After the cups, the marmalade, the tea,
Among the porcelain, among some talk of you and me,
Would it have been worth while,
To have bitten off the matter with a smile,
To have squeezed the universe into a ball
To roll it toward some overwhelming question,
To say: “I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all”—
If one, settling a pillow by her head,
Should say: “That is not what I meant at all;
That is not it, at all.”

And would it have been worth it, after all,
Would it have been worth while,
After the sunsets and the dooryards and the sprinkled streets,
After the novels, after the teacups, after the skirts that trail along the floor—
And this, and so much more?—
It is impossible to say just what I mean!
But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen:
Would it have been worth while
If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl,
And turning toward the window, should say:
“That is not it at all,
That is not what I meant, at all.”
. . . . . . . .

No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;
Am an attendant lord, one that will do
To swell a progress, start a scene or two,
Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool,
Deferential, glad to be of use,
Politic, cautious, and meticulous;
Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;
At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—
Almost, at times, the Fool.

I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.

Shall I part my hair behind? Do I dare to eat a peach?
I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each.

I do not think that they will sing to me.

I have seen them riding seaward on the waves
Combing the white hair of the waves blown back
When the wind blows the water white and black.

We have lingered in the chambers of the sea
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
 

Bo-4

Senator
One of her classmate's responses (the one that makes the most sense to me) .. thx.

====


...The best people "lack all conviction", and the worst are "full of passionate intensity", says Yeats in "The Second Coming."

I'm not sure that I agree with this statement or not. In my opinion, "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death", the opposite is actually true. He is, in my opinion, considered a "good" or even a "best" people because he is fighting in a war. However, he does not do this because of any real reason: "A lonely impulse of delight/ drove to this tumult of the clouds;/ I balanced all, brought all to mind/ The years to come seemed waste of breath, / A waste of breath the years behind / In balance with this life, this death." Therefore, he does not do this for any real "heroic" reason, but he is not the worst, as mentioned above, because he is not "full of passionate intensity". He is simply "balanced" and the past and future, he thinks, is a "waste of breath." Regardless of not doing it because, "Those that" he "fight" he does "not hate." and "Those that" he "guards", he does "not love.", he is still fighting in a war, and in my opinion, that does make him a hero.

In "The Love Song by J. Alfred Prufrock", I do not think that he is the best of man, but he is not the worst, either. Prufrock is a very undecided, un-confident man who is sure that people do not understand him: "And this, and so much more?-- / It is impossible to say just what I mean!" He lacks self respect for himself, and views himself as unworthy and no one of any importance: "I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be ; / Am an attendant lord, one that will do / To swell a progress, start a scene or two, / Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool". He is also weary of growing old and has negative thought about his "balding hair." It is my opinion that he is not the best of people, but he is very undecided, and that he is not the worst of people, also, and I think it is pretty evident in this poem that he is "full of passionate intensity" about anything, as he is undecided about everything...especially something as simple as whether to eat a peach or not.

I think that it is most difficult to be a hero in the modern world because there is so much "alienation" that it would make it hard for a "hero" to have "supernatural" help, or for people to even recognize them as a hero. With the statement from W.B. Yeats about the best of people "lack all conviction," while the worst are "full of passionate intensity." it seems to me that with that, it would be hard to be a superhero. With that being said, I think that there were great heroes in the modern times, and those are the brave soldiers who fought in the Great War, World War I.
 

Bo-4

Senator
Another response which i thought was good:

====

In "The Second Coming" Yeats' speaker says that the best people "lack all conviction". This applies to the speaker "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death". The Irish Airman is about to die, he can see his death coming but all he says is his future "seemed a waste of breath. He didn't choose to join the war because he cared about the people he was fighting for, or didn't like the people he was fighting against. He chose to join the war on "a lonely impulse of delight". He is as Yeats says, one of the best people that lack all conviction.

In "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", we see that though Prufrock would like to make a connection with one of the women present, he doesn't have the guts to do it. If he didn't have the guts to even ask a woman out to tea, he wouldn't have the guts to do anything greater than that. He is also one of the people who lack all conviction.

I believe that these days, it's hard to be a hero, because there are so many things going on. As the world gets bigger, we know more about the world, and we begin to care less. People see so many horrible things happen, that it's hard to choose a cause to be a hero for. We also sometimes become immune to the grief and sadness, because we see it all happen in entertainment.

A person was murdered today; oh no problem, that happens all the time in CSI: Miami. It's hard for people to feel connected to other people's suffering when it's so far away, and they're not a loved one, or someone we care about. Another reason the modern world makes it difficult to be a hero, is because the problems are so big, it seems like there's no way to fix the problem anyway. Where do you start to end world hunger and poverty and war? It's nearly impossible. I think those are some of the reasons why it's so hard to be a hero in our time and world.
 
Top