D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
What improvement?You said the improvement came after Obama left office. Why lie?
What improvement?You said the improvement came after Obama left office. Why lie?
Lies.No, the unions decided that and Obama had to agree.
In September 2016:You're lying again. Your article clearly states Chevron is planning to spend $3 billion in the Permian Basin by 2020. It does NOT say what you claim, that they were spending billions in 2016. They could have made that decision the week or month before, as we know they are constantly monitoring potential plays. Well, I hope you know something this rudimentary.
But thanks for making my case yet even stronger. You just showed they announced a PLAN to increase spending in the Permian Basin over the next 5-6 years. And as soon as Obama left office and the coast was clear, they implemented their plan over the past two years. Thanks for doing so much work for me. I think I'll just shut up and let you keep making my case for me.
Yes, I saw that. You already provided another link that shows they doubled their portfolio from 2017 to 2019.In September 2016:
Chevron is boosting its spending on unconventional plays, mostly in the Permian, and could double its outlays in the Permian to $3 billion by 2020, depending on the price of crude, said Brendan Warn, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, in a note released Monday.
As opposed to "Chevron WILL boost it's spending".
and that helps you make your case that the Sept 2018 flare decision was key to their production increase how?Yes, I saw that. You already provided another link that shows they doubled their portfolio from 2017 to 2019.
Oh but let's play along. Starting when?
Oil an gas production went down under Obama on any land he had any say in..........public land.and that helps you make your case that the Sept 2018 flare decision was key to their production increase how?
This was from July 2016.Yes, I saw that. You already provided another link that shows they doubled their portfolio from 2017 to 2019.
Oh but let's play along. Starting when?
Be specific...what did Hoover do to cause unemployment to climb to 25% and what did FDR do to cut it to 10% by 1939?If you only understood government's role in it getting to go to 25%, you'd be 90% of the way to understanding that the best way for the government to "help" in such situations, is to stop, well, "helping."
Man, you're really getting desperate! But yes, I gladly acknowledge that Chevron chose to start ramping up operations in the Permian Basin as Obama's exit loomed closer and closer. I gladly acknowledge Obama signing the reversal of the export ban was a factor. I gladly acknowledge they doubled their Permian Basin portfolio in the two years following Obama's departure from the White House.This was from July 2016.
Big oil giant Chevron (NYSE:CVX) has a long history in the Permian, having already produced 5 billion barrels of oil. That said, its best days appear to lie ahead. As one of the basin's largest acreage holders, Chevron controls an estimated 9.3 billion barrels of oil equivalent resources. The company is just starting to ramp up horizontal drilling in the region, which could fuel 20% to 35% annual production growth through 2020 depending on oil prices, boosting its Permian output to a range of 250,000-350,000 BOE/d. Meanwhile, there's plenty of growth beyond that, with Chevron believing it has the resources to eventually get its output up to 700,000 BOE/d within a decade.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2016/07/16/the-5-companies-dominating-the-permian-basin.aspx
Funny thing....@thinker is saying Chevron increased their production in the Permian basin and credited the Trump rule change on flaring in Sept 2018. The first problem is that the increase in production started well before that change and the second thing is the change was only related to production on federal land.Oil an gas production went down under Obama on any land he had any say in..........public land.
All increases were on private leases that Obama had nothing to do with.
Oops!
I don't need to "get together" with anyone.Funny thing....@thinker is saying Chevron increased their production in the Permian basin and credited the Trump rule change on flaring in Sept 2018. The first problem is that the increase in production started well before that change and the second thing is the change was only related to production on federal land.
Care to get together with him and get your stories straight?
1. They actually increased their production in the basin mostly by buying other companies, not by drilling new wells.Man, you're really getting desperate! But yes, I gladly acknowledge that Chevron chose to start ramping up operations in the Permian Basin as Obama's exit loomed closer and closer. I gladly acknowledge Obama signing the reversal of the export ban was a factor. I gladly acknowledge they doubled their Permian Basin portfolio in the two years following Obama's departure from the White House.
Is there anything else I can do for you?
The Permian Basin is federal land. Production has been increasing every year...even while Obama was in charge.I don't need to "get together" with anyone.
My post is 100% accurate. Your dodge is noted.
What a complete lie.The Permian Basin is federal land. Production has been increasing every year...even while Obama was in charge.
A couple of points....you're inability to actually establish cause and effect has now returned to your claim to be able to read minds. You said production increased because Trump did away with limits on flaring. That was in September of 2018. Now that you've been confronted with the fact that their increase in production is largely due to acquisitions and slant drilling technology improvements going back to 2016, which all certainly started in the planning stages back in 2015...so you're fall back position is that in 2015 they knew that Trump would be president and throw out the flare limits in 2018...or that Hillary would take over and she could be bribed.....Man, you're really getting desperate! But yes, I gladly acknowledge that Chevron chose to start ramping up operations in the Permian Basin as Obama's exit loomed closer and closer. I gladly acknowledge Obama signing the reversal of the export ban was a factor. I gladly acknowledge they doubled their Permian Basin portfolio in the two years following Obama's departure from the White House.
Is there anything else I can do for you?
By now you may have already read about the fact that an oil and gas leasing auction conducted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Southeast New Mexico late last week grossed almost a billion dollars, coming in at $967 million. As the Albuquerque Journal noted, that sum more than tripled the total dollars bid on all federal onshore lease auctions held during the entirety of 2017, and more than doubled the previous record year of 2008.What a complete lie.
Here is a map of the Permian basin...
Here is a link to a map of federal land in Texas:
https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/printable/images/pdf/fedlands/TX.pdf
Not even close.
If you are correct and the Permian is not federal land then Trump's change to the flaring rule would not apply and @The Thinker was wrong.What a complete lie.
Here is a map of the Permian basin...
Here is a link to a map of federal land in Texas:
https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/printable/images/pdf/fedlands/TX.pdf
Not even close.
I guess I will have to educate the ignorant once again.................If you are correct and the Permian is not federal land then Trump's change to the flaring rule would not apply and @The Thinker was wrong.
In any case, you have yet to provide any evidence that oil production declined on federal land from 2009 to 2017.