New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

BOMBSHELL! Obama Iran Deal a HOAX! Iran NEVER SIGNED Nuclear Deal

So what? As Iran did not sign any agreement. There was no deal. Just a fake deal from a fake president.
Of course it was a deal, and whether or not they signed it is quite irrelevant as they were honoring it, the IAEA was monitoring it and all the members regularly certified Iranian compliance, even Trump..........twice!!!
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
Really now! You're smarter than that. It was pallets of cash to the top state sponsor of terrorism as defined by the State Department headed by John Kerry at the time.

A treaty signed off by the Senate would have been binding, Knowing that would never happen it became just a deal......a one way deal. They get the money in exchange for nothing.

A gift you might say, to do with what they wished. Make no mistake Obama, Kerry, along with Iranian born Valerie Jarrett were to some extent funding terrorism
Oh, so you're talking about giving Iran its own money as the U.S. was ordered to do by the World Court? But Marvin was talking about aiding ISIS ... you know, the guys who hated Iran and got into battles with Iran and their allies.
 

worldlymrb

Revenge
Of course it was a deal, and whether or not they signed it is quite irrelevant as they were honoring it, the IAEA was monitoring it and all the members regularly certified Iranian compliance, even Trump..........twice!!!
Know this, real Leaders/Presidents get their deals SIGNED. Failed community organizers sign with pallets of other peoples money.
 

worldlymrb

Revenge
Last edited:
According to fake Hope/Change himself he sent $1.7B in untraceable cash. Or are you going to go racist and call Obama a liar?
$1.7-billion payment to Iran was all in cash due to effectiveness of sanctions, White House says
Sep 7, 2016 · "President Obama's disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was ... of terror pallets of untraceable cash isn't just terrible policy," Royce said.
You don’t give a shit about that, you just hate Obama.

How about when this happened.

The US flew nearly $12bn in shrink-wrapped $100 bills into Iraq, then distributed the cash with no proper control over who was receiving it and how it was being spent.

The staggering scale of the biggest transfer of cash in the history of the Federal Reserve has been graphically laid bare by a US congressional committee.
 

worldlymrb

Revenge
You don’t give a shit about that, you just hate Obama.
Isn’t historic that a so-called American President gave a terrorist state $1.7B in untraceable cash that nobody even had to sign for? At least mainstream corporate media said it was historic and accused anybody who disagreed a racist.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
According to fake Hope/Change himself he sent $1.7B in untraceable cash. Or are you going to go racist and call Obama a liar?
$1.7-billion payment to Iran was all in cash due to effectiveness of sanctions, White House says
Sep 7, 2016 · "President Obama's disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was ... of terror pallets of untraceable cash isn't just terrible policy," Royce said.
Of course that wasn't the question, was it? You said it was someone else's money. Yes, it was Iran's money. WTF are you talking about "Untraceable"? Would you expect that we marked the money? Were the serial numbers recorded? Almost certainly. At each step the money has to be accounted for...the bank hands over a huge sum of money...someone has to sign for it. That person is responsible for supervising the transport of that money to where it will be flown to Tehran...and someone signs for it. When it gets to Iran, someone has to sign for it....Each step of the way.

The transfer had to be in cash because no bank in Iran can access any money transfer network anywhere else in the world.
 

worldlymrb

Revenge
Of course that wasn't the question, was it? You said it was someone else's money. Yes, it was Iran's money. WTF are you talking about "Untraceable"? Would you expect that we marked the money? Were the serial numbers recorded? Almost certainly. At each step the money has to be accounted for...the bank hands over a huge sum of money...someone has to sign for it. That person is responsible for supervising the transport of that money to where it will be flown to Tehran...and someone signs for it. When it gets to Iran, someone has to sign for it....Each step of the way.

The transfer had to be in cash because no bank in Iran can access any money transfer network anywhere else in the world.
So Obama gave terrorist state Iran $1.7B in untraceable cash because US Banks wouldn’t circumvent U.S anti-terror laws despite pressure from Obama?

Thanks for the clarification on Obama’s lawlessness :)
 
So Obama gave terrorist state Iran $1.7B in untraceable cash because US Banks wouldn’t circumvent U.S anti-terror laws despite pressure from Obama?

Thanks for the clarification on Obama’s lawlessness :)
That's precisely what happened. Obama laundered the cash himself because he couldn't convince legitimate banks to do it for him. Anything for his ISIS pals...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So Obama gave terrorist state Iran $1.7B in untraceable cash because US Banks wouldn’t circumvent U.S anti-terror laws despite pressure from Obama?

Thanks for the clarification on Obama’s lawlessness :)
What would traceable cash look like, in your view? The serial numbers would have been recorded...that is all done with currency counting machines these days.

What banks were approached to transfer this money? None. The money transfer you are talking about was from a bank in Oman.

Keeping track of details seems to be a problem for you. Is it ADD?
 
Top