EatTheRich
President
He said, “I know nothing about Russia” during one of his debates with Clinton.he denies any contact with russia? i dunno.. please provide a link to this..
He said, “I know nothing about Russia” during one of his debates with Clinton.he denies any contact with russia? i dunno.. please provide a link to this..
Any now the Senate has confirmed what he said. How funny of you to point that out.He said, “I know nothing about Russia” during one of his debates with Clinton.
he sure did. it was pat of a much larger statement... here you go.. at minute 50.He said, “I know nothing about Russia” during one of his debates with Clinton.
Those contacts were a big part of why people voted for Trump. Hillary was campaigning that she would go to war with Russia over cyber attacks the same as if they were military attacks. Hillary was scaring the sh*t out of people, myself included. Trump was seen as friendly with Russia (it hasn't turned out to be the case) ... that turned a lot of votes.It's not over 'til it's over, Marv. Dream on anyway, if it makes you so happy.>
----------
Trump and His Associates Had
More Than 100 Contacts With
Russians Before the Inauguration
https://nyti.ms/2S7JmBv
That's only one of many to come. I'd like to see what ALL of them say.sorry, you figure the news reporting today is it?
i'm thinking...and it may just be me..that the bipartisan committe will issue some sort of findings..
no?
The broader context makes him look that much more dishonest.he sure did. it was pat of a much larger statement... here you go.. at minute 50.
good luck
Hillary was for keeping for keeping democracy intact...Russia tries to uproot it by cyber attacks /propaganda outlets. Why not let the Russians know it by declaring, it wouldn't be tolerated.Those contacts were a big part of why people voted for Trump. Hillary was campaigning that she would go to war with Russia over cyber attacks the same as if they were military attacks. Hillary was scaring the sh*t out of people, myself included. Trump was seen as friendly with Russia (it hasn't turned out to be the case) ... that turned a lot of votes.
I don't think it was the case, but in 2016, people perceived Trump as friendly with Putin. And I think it did win him votes. It turned out that he had never met Putin.Hillary was for keeping for keeping democracy intact...Russia tries to uproot it by cyber attacks /propaganda outlets. Why not let the Russians know it by declaring, it wouldn't be tolerated.
Trump wanting to be friends with Russia... not sure that turned lots of votes for him.
Have to wonder if his base still feel swayed now the way you want to portray them...
Using your logic, obviously many felt quite the opposite toward Putin/Russia since Hillary won the popular vote...
What is the motivation for the senate Democrats on the committee to lie about this?What do you call politicians ? Which is what the senate is after all, a group of politicians.
How DARE you expect a liberal to take an entire quote on a topic, as opposed to a few words! What is wrong with you?he sure did. it was pat of a much larger statement... here you go.. at minute 50.
good luck
Good read here, Days.I don't think it was the case, but in 2016, people perceived Trump as friendly with Putin. And I think it did win him votes. It turned out that he had never met Putin.
Collusion means nothing. Collusion to aid and abbet a crime is the real deal.
Good read here, Days.
===================
What Is Collusion? Is It Even a Crime?
The president’s son met with a Russian lawyer offering damaging information about Hillary Clinton. Does that mean the campaign colluded with the Kremlin? We asked legal experts to size up the evidence.
By POLITICO MAGAZINE
July 12, 2017
excerpt:
President Donald Trump has repeatedly denied colluding with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign. Yet, the revelation of a meeting last year—between his son, his campaign chairman, his son-in-law and a Russian lawyer who promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton from the Russian government—suggests that the question of collusion is an open one; according to emails arranging the meeting, Trump’s son Donald Jr. was aware of that promise and said in response, “I love it.” And, of course, special counsel Robert Mueller is still investigating this very matter.
But what precisely would constitute collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, and have we actually seen evidence of it so far? We asked legal experts—former federal prosecutors, law professors and more—to help make sense of the situation based on the evidence that has been made public so far. Most were quick to note that collusion itself is not a specific federal crime—what matters is what kind of cooperation might have taken place and in what way. As to whether collusion did occur or a crime was committed, they said the jury is still out.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366
All of the bipartisan committees?!?That's only one of many to come. I'd like to see what ALL of them say.
I'm sure. Very sadThe broader context makes him look that much more dishonest.
Somebody should caution them. They're going to assure Trump a second term. So sadHow DARE you expect a liberal to take an entire quote on a topic, as opposed to a few words! What is wrong with you?
I say let them keep up their stupidity! We need Trump for a second term. He has a lot more to do!Somebody should caution them. They're going to assure Trump a second term. So sad
I get your drift....
So you think the Dems are lying when they Burr's statements were out of context ?What is the motivation for the senate Democrats on the committee to lie about this?
Trump's will have by far. We are going to have to change the way we do elections because he exposed the faults in that system.I get your drift....
We will wait and see whose presidential legacy made the greatest impact on America.
Agreed. It's time we had a nationwide Voter ID.Trump's will have by far. We are going to have to change the way we do elections because he exposed the faults in that system.