Discussion in 'BFD' started by Days, Nov 6, 2015.
I don't know or care.
So why do you write online novels that will never be read
Why do you care? Seems pretty crazy to wonder so much why someone writes something you didn't even bother to read.
Because some schitzos are very dangerous
So you are concerned that some poster you don't know and never read might be crazy and dangerous, but not concerned enough to bother to read his posts, but still concerned enough to ask him if he is crazy? Not that that makes you a troll or anything, but Winston, I'm guessing that posters are starting to ignore you... n'est-ce pas?
The Florida school shooter and the unibomber both told the world how koo coo they were.
Really, you need significant help
There are 2 crazy people in the world so the rest of the world must be crazy?
Stupid one liners like that sort of define you as a troll.
You say something dumb and in your mind this makes me a troll.
This defines schizophrenia
As I said
You may now continue with your manifesto
Well, hey, thank you Winston, cuz we both know I was right on the verge of quitting, but now you gave me permission to continue! whew, that was a close one.
Here is the difference between my open minded approach to ancient evidence and the closed minded attacks of a troll, which fairly represent the academic mindset of higher learning... I will watch videos like this one that I am in the middle of - not because I believe we have been visited by people from other planets - I don't believe that for a moment - but I will still watch videos like this because the presentation looks at ancient evidence, and that is what interests me.
Expert Decodes Sumerian Clay Tablets You Won't Believe What He Discovered
Meanwhile, the troll won't watch it, and yet you can be sure the troll will say the guy is batshit crazy and the lecture is horse manure, because that's what the troll says about everyone and everything he comes across... because he is a troll.
No one can quit their manifesto, continue on one flew over
Now I am impressed as you admit being batshit crazy...………………….
you are nothing, if not, so easily predictable...
I'm over halfway through the video, up to the break. Once again, consider that the knowledge that was in the earth from before the flood was passed down to the people who came after the flood. The knowledge did not originate with the Sumerians, it was given to them by those who came down from heaven... and when did they come down from heaven? Before the flood.
Did you find any more proof of 25 foot tall people...………………?
you know, it wouldn't hurt you to actually learn a little bit about our ancient past. I found a video that covers a lot of ground and just presents the evidence...
here ya go Winston....
Advanced Ancient Technology Something Has Been Discovered That Hardly Anyone is Talking About
... should help with that big knowledge gap in between your ears
Okay, here's a video of research done on the ancient star gazing...
by the ancestors of the Hopi in the American Southwest...
When he is covering Orion and the Giza Plateau in the beginning, he is moving pretty fast because he wants to get to the subject of his presentation, but you need to know there's more to the OCT than just the overhead overlay, if you stand opposite Orion's rising in the sky at the well area, there is a moment when Orion's 3 belt stars rise up directly above the pinnacle of Giza's 3 pyramids, so the height of the 3 pyramids also correlate to Orion.
This is something of a mystery, because it places the construction of the pyramids at around 10,000-12,000 years ago, when the Nubians were returning to the land of Osiron (the flood drove them southward)... so, at that time, the Egyptians and all cultures were re-mapping the night sky, and this was the time when "modern" astrology began.
But I agree with John West on this, that there is a dilemma of technology; how could the great technological feat of Giza Plateau been performed in the wiped clean civilization of post flood times? I don't agree with John West that the Sphinx is anything to do with the constellation of LEO, I adhere to the theory that it was originally the more ancient Egyptian civilization god ANUBIS. Perhaps, the technology to cut, levitate, and place the massive works of the Giza plateau survived the flood with certain wizards, one of which was a manifestation of the also more ancient Egyptian god THOTH. The entire plateau is built by a master plan, so maybe this is how it was achieved?
I comb through so much material, I forget a lot of it. I think the ancients pointed at Sirius B (the dogstar) as the binary twin of the sun. We are going to have to take their word for it, we don't have the time it would take to re-map that 24,000 year cycle.
You do that for me, I'm watching the market
I did watch that one, and it was perfect for you. I still haven't watched the Hopi ancient star gazing, but I will catch it. The guys giving the presentations are acknowledged scholars and authors on the subject they are teaching.
Something toward the 38 minute mark of the first one... he mentioned that the keystone cuts were likely to carry current between the stones. This is part of the pyramid technology; all these ancient sites were chosen because they were where the lay lines of the earth's magnetic field crossed, so there was electromagnetic energy there, ELF waves, and the stones were tuned to those waves and carried that current. The radical chambers were made of rose granite and basalt becauise those stones rang like a bell, and carried current.
I used to follow the bond markets... back when I was banking. I've got posts on the currency in here somewhere. I think on the other side of this forum (PJ Post Hall of Fame), you might find that subject more interesting.
Are you descended from Atlantean mermaids?
If you would watch the video, you would understand that this thread is looking at worldwide evidence... literally all the evidence that is on this planet from prehistoric times (older than 6000 years ago). Care to venture a guess how many cut block stone fall into that category? This isn't a conspiracy theory, this is the history of the planet. I believe that JFK was killed by a conspiracy of high level government officials, that included LBJ, and the assassination was put together and carried out by GHWBush, both of whom went on to become presidents. There is plenty of evidence to back up that conspiracy theory. But it was just one event. Meanwhile, these threads are looking at a paradigm shift in our understanding of man's tenure on planet earth and what that tenure consisted of. Human understanding is coming out of the dark ages, we have grown from the earthcentric model to the solar system model, now we are beginning to grasp that the perspective of the galaxy is the result of the sun's path, not the earth's path. And as we progress in our understanding of all things, we find that we have all been here before, that the ancients knew all these things, but the earth was struck by a cataclysm 12,500 years ago and we lost advanced technology and our advanced understanding of the universe, now we are starting to get it back. Can you see how different that is from mermaids?
Once more, for your knowledge gap...
We all have a little troll cynicism in us, and with good reason... so much of what gets offered as history is confused and doesn't make sense. Sometimes it is easy enough to untangle. Like the location of Mt Sinai. It was clearly in the land of Midian. Moses spent 40 years in Midian, then returned to Egypt, then returned to Midian for another 40 years, the latter time with the whole nation of Israel. But Constantine's mother gets lost on her trip to the holy land and figures some rock in the middle of the tongue peninsula to be Mt Sinai. She is totally clueless, but hey, she's the emperor's mother.
Sometimes we have to think a little harder, but these riddles are still very solvable. So, the guy that pours the most scholarship into the Sumerian tablets tells us that they speak of space travel, and that these anunaki came from this planet Nebiru, and that mankind is a genetic clipping from their own DNA. And now that the master has passed, his co-workers continue to assert that the scholarship is accurate; so the history is gaining credibility, although it is still not confirmed.
When I look at their evidence, a few things strike me immediately. First of all, yes, the book of Genesis seems to have whipped through the same early history, but it doesn't present the view that Adam was a creation of mankind from another planet. To this end, these folk would say the Bible didn't give the whole picture; but hey, Moses was no stupid, he had access to all the higher learning that these modern scholars only have remnants, so maybe he had good reason for shortening the story.
At any rate, let me ask, are we supposed to believe that this planet of the crossing had the same atmospheric pressure, gravity, warmth, water, chemical composition as earth? Because in order to just skip from one planet to another, those things have to be the same. If you look at the elliptical orbit of Nebiru, there is no way in hell that planet has the same atmospheric pressure, gravity, warmth, water, and chemical composition as earth. Yes, the Sumerian tablets record (450,000 years after the fact) man had space travel in and about the solar system, and yes, there is record of navigation to Nebiru and back; but the same people tell us that we had space ports here on earth, so why couldn't the record just as easily be telling of space travel that originated from planet earth? And visited the other planets?
Likewise, couldn't the titles be applied to several generations... much as we had dynasties rule in China for several generations? Why do they keep thinking they apply to one person? And why do they omit God from their scholarship? Moses clearly believed the passages were about God's creation of man, why can't they - at least - acknowledge the scholarship of Moses? Christians understand that there were fallen angels at work in the earth, how can you pretend to have the correct interpretation of the creation of man, and totally discard the spiritual realm? Doesn't man have a spirit? Isn't this a record of God breathing the spirit of life into man? When you can't see the spirit, you really don't understand the creation of man.
We shouldn't ignore the evidence. Nor the scholarship that has worked on the evidence. But I don't have to buy into their conclusions. I agree with the troll... there is all kinds of evidence out there, let's not toss common sense out the window, when we go about interpreting it.
Separate names with a comma.