You sure that's what he meant, because of the error in her writing, I am not sure exactly what the context is here. However if any one thinks that Roe v Wade is in the constitution has not read the constitution.
you are actually so incompetent and lacking in any legal or historical or reading skills you believe every legal decision made by any Supreme Court is only legal if you agree with it, and that is has to be based on something written VERBATIM in the Constitution.
In other words, the Supreme Court was wrong to rule that separate but equal schools are unconstitutional, as was decided in 1954, because the Constitution does not specifically state- Segregated public schools are unconstitutional.
And the Supreme Court was wrong to rule that the military draft was legal and constitutional, as it did here-
Supreme Court rules that the draft is constitutional - Selective Draft Law Cases., 38 S. Ct. 159, 245 U.S. 366 (1918)
[1] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
[2] Nos. 663, 664, 665, 666, 681, 769
[3] 38 S. Ct. 159, 245 U.S. 366, 62 L. Ed. 349, 1918.SCT.40022 <
http://www.versuslaw.com>
[4] January 7, 1918
Because the Constitution does not clearly state, The military draft is constitutional.
Or that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not the law of the land, because the main provisions of that law shown here-
Title I of the act guarantees equal
voting rights by removing registration requirements and procedures
biased against minorities and the underprivileged. Title II prohibits
segregation or
discrimination in places of public accommodation involved in
interstate commerce.-
are not quoted verbatim anywhere in the Constitution.
In short, almost all the Supreme Court rulings, which are legal and constitutional until overturned by another Supreme Court ruling, are decisions based on an interpretation of the Constitution, not just finding the exact words in the Constitution to base laws on.
you and other anti-choice voters have no concept of the law and of the Constitution.