California drought has ended, climate change nuts.

[EatTheRich]

Incorrect, of course. Citing specific local weather as conclusively attributable to AGW is anti-scientific.

I didn’t say that. I talked about statistical attribution of weather patterns.

 

[RickWA]

You say as you post using satellite technology developed by the USSR ... also the country to introduce peaceful use of nuclear fission.

Capitalism requires that private profit take priority over human need which makes it unable to address this sort of “tragedy of the commons” situation.

Also false. Capitalism is demonstrably the crucible of a vastly disproportionate yield of innovation, invention, and technological advancement - and it ain’t close. Stubborn swinging of the anti-capitalist cudgel shows that you folks are unserious about AGW other than as weapon against capitalism and liberty.

 

[EatTheRich]

Also false. Capitalism is demonstrably the crucible of a vastly disproportionate yield of innovation, invention, and technological advancement - and it ain’t close. Stubborn swinging of the anti-capitalist cudgel shows that you folks are unserious about AGW other than as weapon against capitalism and liberty.

I read that on my phone using LED technology, also created in the USSR ... which in less than 2 generations went from gas lighting in a single city only to being the first nation in space.

 

[RickWA]

I read that on my phone using LED technology, also created in the USSR ... which in less than 2 generations went from gas lighting in a single city only to being the first nation in space.

It ain’t close. Not at all.

 

[EatTheRich]

It ain’t close. Not at all.

Agreed. It took the capitalist world centuries full of genocide, slavery, and war to achieve technological advancement comparable to what the Soviet Union achieved in a few decades while meanwhile defending itself against the combined strength of the entire rest of the world.

 

[Nostra]

Agreed. It took the capitalist world centuries full of genocide, slavery, and war to achieve technological advancement comparable to what the Soviet Union achieved in a few decades while meanwhile defending itself against the combined strength of the entire rest of the world.

How's that "Soviet Union" doing these days?

 

[RickWA]

How's that "Soviet Union" doing these days?

I’m stepping away now. When a person is so far gone as to pen the above, there’s no productive purpose to continue to engage. The Soviet Union was truly an evil empire. An abomination.

 

[EatTheRich]

How's that "Soviet Union" doing these days?

The Stalinist “prison house of nations” built to contain socialism and transmit capitalist values has collapsed due to the popular fight for democracy.

But the countries that composed it are still the modern industrial powerhouses that in 1917 they were not.

 

[Nostra]

I’m stepping away now. When a person is so far gone as to pen the above, there’s no productive purpose to continue to engage. The Soviet Union was truly an evil empire. An abomination.

He whines about genocide while praising Stalin.

Truly amazing.

 

[EatTheRich]

He whines about genocide while praising Stalin.

Truly amazing.

Stalin was an enemy of the Soviet Union. Its revolution succeeded despite him, not because of him.

 

[4/15]

What did? Please explain.

The animal has a real problem with reality as demonstrated by his incorrect abbreviation for California. He also lacks intelligence to make valid points.

 

[Dawg]

The animal has a real problem with reality as demonstrated by his incorrect abbreviation for California. He also lacks intelligence to make valid points.

"The animal" it is you that lacks the intelligence

Cali

 

[Days]

False. The dramatic heating was predicted based on the physical theory before it was observed. The only politics has come from folks like you objecting to the science for political reasons.

The dramatical heating was predicted AFTER the dramatical cooling was predicted and neither ever happened.

 

[Days]

Where does it say it has rained at least once a week for seven years?

I'm thinking you have some kind of mental block here?

52 weeks x 7 years = 364 weeks

California drought officially over after more than seven years...
The state experienced some form of drought for 376 consecutive weeks, the National Drought Mitigation Center said.

... okay, I see it now, they used the wrong word, it should read the state experienced some form of precipitation for 376 consecutive weeks? At least that makes sense, maybe this was so garbled I didn't read it correctly? "The state experienced some form of drought for 376 consecutive weeks" isn't English.

 

[EatTheRich]

The dramatical heating was predicted AFTER the dramatical cooling was predicted and neither ever happened.

Link to scientists predicting dramatic cooling prior to 1959. Then feel free to post your evidence that the scientists were wrong about the many converging lines of evidence for the dramatic warming.

 

[Days]

Link to scientists predicting dramatic cooling prior to 1959. Then feel free to post your evidence that the scientists were wrong about the many converging lines of evidence for the dramatic warming.

We've already posted all of that over and over, I'm not your errand boy, especially when you purposely forget everything over and over. That little game gets old. See, you are not arguing science, you are pushing politics.

 

[EatTheRich]

We've already posted all of that over and over, I'm not your errand boy, especially when you purposely forget everything over and over. That little game gets old. See, you are not arguing science, you are pushing politics.

No, you haven’t. Your inability to supply the requested evidence does not make my insistence on it a “game.” It is my insistence on evidence that makes my approach scientific and not political.

 

[Days]

No, you haven’t. Your inability to supply the requested evidence does not make my insistence on it a “game.” It is my insistence on evidence that makes my approach scientific and not political.

yes I have and your statistical models were based upon databasing surface temps, with no regard for the true nature of the atmosphere. The theory that resulted was and is nonsense.

"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." (Nikola Tesla)

 

[FakeName]

I'm thinking you have some kind of mental block here?

52 weeks x 7 years = 364 weeks

California drought officially over after more than seven years...
The state experienced some form of drought for 376 consecutive weeks, the National Drought Mitigation Center said.

... okay, I see it now, they used the wrong word, it should read the state experienced some form of precipitation for 376 consecutive weeks? At least that makes sense, maybe this was so garbled I didn't read it correctly? "The state experienced some form of drought for 376 consecutive weeks" isn't English.

Right. Like I said rain in the summer in California is rare in both wet years and dry ones.

 

[Days]

Right. Like I said rain in the summer in California is rare in both wet years and dry ones.

I've lived in California. I know about the drought. I also know that you have gotten plenty of rain the past two years. Neither the drought, nor the rain are "climate change"... California has the same climate it always had, it isn't changing.