1. Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?
    Dismiss Notice

CIA Agent Gives Sworn Statement:‘We Brought Down the Twin Towers on 9/11

Discussion in 'Controversial Topics' started by AIL, Aug 6, 2017.

  1. middleview

    middleview Senator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    49,389
    Likes Received:
    3,859
    It is hard to believe you can muster the brain power to remember to breathe....

    There were about 3,000 people killed in the towers. Are you actually trying to claim 30,000 clean up people died?


    Thermite doesn't explode it burns. Since it would burn through metal in seconds, perhaps you'd explain why it took over an hour for the collapse to happen...Why didn't the impact and resulting fire set off the thermite?

    Add to that the fact that any intentional demolition of buildings is done from the bottom up, not the top down.

    Nothing you have to say on the matter makes sense....Again, why involve thousands of potential leakers in the over engineered plot to fly planes into the towers when it would have been trivial to drive a couple of trucks into the garage under each building and blow them up...bringing the two towers down?
     
  2. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    Quit with the pretend stupid answers.

    The question wasn't how did it fly to the ground, the question was, how did it fly INTO the ground.

    ... as if you didn't understand the first 7 times.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    I love these insults followed by posting that reads like artificial intelligence wrote it; I am really wondering if you are human.

    40,000 of the 50,000 clean-up workers died of radiation cancer induced illnesses, and the government refused to take responsibility for the deaths, so the 10,000 survivors sued and won easily.


    nano-thermite. It's an explosive made at the molecular level... which is why it is radioative.

    the demolition sequence of the towers was started at the impact area and proceeded both up and down the towers. (You never answered why the lower towers, which were not burned by fire or impacted by jets, suffered collapse; especially since nothing was impacting the lower towers. If the pancake theory - the only government explanation offered for the collapse - was correct, the floors would all have been stacked on top of each other and the core and curtain wall would still be standing.)


    None of the 4 commercial jets were flown or hi-jacked on 09/11/2001. Your disinformation is what doesn't make sense.

     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. middleview

    middleview Senator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    49,389
    Likes Received:
    3,859
    If you do not want to be insulted you should avoid using insults. I've answered your questions each time you've asked them...and you ignore the answer and ask again.

    Your video asks how can parts of a plane go through the tower and come out the other side when a bus can't seem to go through a concrete wall...Does that actually make sense to you? The plane is traveling at 500 mph and weighs something in excess of 300,000 lbs. How fast was that bus going? How much does it weigh? Is the wall of the WTC tower as solid as a concrete wall? No. It is vertical columns of steel with glass in between. Do we actually know if that was the nose of the plane or was it an engine?

    Do you have an example of a 104 story building collapsing in pancake fasion and the floors remaining intact? The weight of the top of the building as it falls is clearly crushing everything below it.

    I gave you a link to the engineering explanation to WTC 7. If you refuse to read it is up to you...

    You have still not addressed the fact that an operation meant to blame Al Qaeda would simply have had to drive a few trucks into the garages and been remotely detonated and yet the conspiracy you support is that over a period of weeks someone smuggled tons of high explosives into three buildings and weren't discovered...contacted people at United and American airlines to make four planes disappear, told the FAA and air traffic control people to ignore their radar and go along with the plan...and arranged for thousands of people to pretend they lost relatives and friends.

    Todd Beemer was one who lost his life on the plane that crashed into the field in Pennsylvania....his business card was found in the debris...so now we've added Oracle into the conspiracy because if he never existed and wasn't killed that day...wouldn't someone there notice?

    Where did the four planes go? One conspiracy theory is that the airlines continued to use the planes...except that the FAA records maintenance schedules and who the mechanic was who did the work...Wouldn't that mean even more people have to go along? If parts are ordered for the planes, the aircraft ID would have to be provided...and now Boeing personnel have to be in on it.
     
  5. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    pulverized into dust
    I don't think you are a human. I think you are some type of artificial intelligence... a bot.

    You seem utterly incapable of grasping human ideas. Instead, you post cover-up programming, just like a bot would. You haven't answered a single question I put to you in this entire thread.

    After 09/11, the CIA flooded the internet with bots like you. They all use the same posting technique; they intimidate, insult, and act superior. The effect was to bully the entire internet into a completely ridiculous cover-up story. They never answer a real question, they just push their programming in each issue.... sometimes what they post isn't remotely close to the question, and they don't even notice.

    Do you realize that this reply of yours didn't go near my only question in the post it replied to? I repeated the question about why did the lower tower structures collapse when they were not burned by fire, nor struck by a jet, nor impacted by upper floors. You didn't even notice the question, just like the first two times I asked it. Your software is confident it addressed every querstion because it triggered responses... but not human responses, not human conversation, not human answers; just pre-programmed material shoving the cover-up down our throats.

    How did a 757 fly INTO the ground?? If you are a human, answer that with a human answer. The question is crystal clear. Explain to me, a pilot, how a commercial jet can fly into the earth.... I've asked you that question 7-8 times now, and you haven't seemed capable of addressing the concept. A commercial jet crashes onto the earth, it is physically impossible to fly into the earth. So HOW does a commercial jet fly into the earth deep enough to disappear completely? Looking for a human answer, one that addresses the concept being asked.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. middleview

    middleview Senator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    49,389
    Likes Received:
    3,859
    I've answered your question each and every time you asked it....

    Let me put it to you this way...If I point a gun at the ground and fire it...how far into the dirt will the bullet go? Will it bounce off and be laying, intact on the surface?

    I've also answered your question about WTC 7....with an engineering diagram showing exactly how the structure collapsed and why. You say WTC 7 wasn't damaged by the impact of jets or by fire...It was damaged by falling debris from WTC 1 and by fires that burned for 7 hours.
     
  7. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    okay, you are a bot.

    you can't even grasp the nature of a question.

    How did the jet fly into the ground? Not ... will a bullet penetrate the earth if fired into it?
    >>> those two ideas are not even close.

    Why did the lower tower sections collapse? Not ... why did WTC7 collapse?
    >>> my pointing out that the lower sections were not impacted by a jet triggered your programming for a WTC7 question... a human would have easily understood I asked about the lower sections of the Twin Towers, not WTC7.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. middleview

    middleview Senator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    49,389
    Likes Received:
    3,859
    Why are they not the same in principle? If driven straight into the ground there is going to be a crater and dirt around the top will fall into the crater on top of the debris. You can't even address the fact that the crater in Lockerbie was huge. It is simply incurable stupidity on your part to insist that there would not have been a crater or that the same rules of physics would not apply to any object given mass and speed...Imagine a bullet that weighed 300,000 lbs and was traveling at 500 mph....if it hit the ground straight on...how deep would it penetrate into the ground?

    The lower sections of WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed because of the weight of the falling top floors....

    Again...why in hell would anyone come up with a plan like this instead of simply driving trucks into the garages and blow them up as was tried in 1993?

    The very idea that any individual capable of coming up with this plan would then say that there are far simpler ways to accomplish the destruction of the tower...

    None of what you suggest makes sense. The range of conspiracy theories you guys come up with should confirm for you that you are in the company of madmen....

    Were there planes or was it mass hypnosis, with thousands of New Yorkers subject to a hypnotic suggestion that they saw planes? Of course this requires that somehow the plotters had film available in real time to put on the news...You'd also have to get people from the airlines to lie about planes that didn't take off, passengers that didn't board, ground crew that didn't load baggage and air traffic controllers who would have to lie about guiding four planes into takeoff position and into the air....and insurance companies that didn't get claims from the airlines for planes that didn't crash...

    If there were planes, as some claim, and they were military planes...explain why these smart guys didn't think to paint the planes like airliners.

    How did someone manage to smuggle tons of explosives into the towers without anyone noticing? Why did they wait over an hour after the impact of the planes to blow up those explosives? Why didn't the fires from the planes ignite the explosives? Why would they plant the explosives in the middle of the tower when all experts would tell you that building destruction is always from the ground up?
     
  9. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    you are a bot.

    a human would have been totally embarrassed by your inability to recognize simple human ideas, instead, you just spit out more programming... as if it never happened.

    We've noticed this about you, MV, you lack human feelings, and you lack human ideas, you are always hard wired into every government link but you can't seem to grasp any nuance of conversation; you were advanced artificial intelligence 10 years ago, likely cutting edge stuff... but today they have much better quality out there; today's cutting edge ai can handle conversation; you can not even understand that you don't understand it....

    .... because you are a bot.

    commercial jets can not, have not ever, and never will be capable of flying into the earth. I'm sorry you was programmed to repeat that utterly stupid cover up LIE, and I am sorry that you are not a human, capable of blushing for having repeated it.

    the pancake theory was disavowed by the government soon after it came out; over a decade ago!
    I'm sorry your programming was never updated to something that could at least address the fact that the trusses in the lower section of the towers were never heated, so it was ridiculous to expect they failed. To be fair, the government never even addressed the heavy beams of steel on each floor, they pretended the steel was never laid! There simply was never an answer from the government that came any where close to addressing how the vertical trusses failed; they even tried to deny that the structures were vertical trusses. So, there really wasn't anything there to program you with.

    the towers were pulverized into dust
    I'm sorry you have no programming to address the concept. I can't imagine why not, since the idea has been around since the beginning. Takes an incredible amount of explosives - yes, nano-thermite is an explosive - to pulverize all that concrete into dust; if your robot eyes would have scanned the picture I posted, you should have noticed that there was no pancaking on the towers; each floor was pulverized into dust and the steel beams were tossed hundreds of feet into every direction; there is nothing left of each floor; they are totally demolished; that's why there was no rubble pile, let alone 104 intact pancaked floors.


    ** I could go on and cover all the questions and why you didn't even grasp the nature of the question; but you will just give another software response; bottom line; you are a bot, not a human. I've suspected as much for five years now.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2017
  10. AIL

    AIL Jet fuel that's a good one.

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,313
    Likes Received:
    931

    I am convinced middleview is a paid poster he is paid to post government bullshit always backs and supports every single needless wars waged by American goveremnmt lies.

    Don't waste any more of your time with logical arguments he is unable to understand logic because mind can only listen to goveremnmt lies any thing to the contrary is beyond his comprehension.. Maybe you are right that does sound and describe a robot ..
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    Whether he is a robot or a human only capable of robot posting... what's the difference?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Days

    Days Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    The lesson I learned from posting on the false flags was this: when the military/CIA pulls a black operation, they are under orders to Lie. They are never going to come clean, except maybe on their death bed, like the guy in your top post. Until then, they will stare at a blank wall and sidewalk and swear up and down that they see a 757. They will stare at the biggest demolition sequence of explosions ever recorded and swear up and down it is a gravitational collapse. You simply can not expect them to ever tell the truth, they will not, they can not, be honest, not when you are dealing with a black-op and a psy-op all rolled in one. All you can do is post the truth and expect them to debunk it with a bunch of Lies; because that's what is going to happen every time.

    The WTC towers were not normal skyscrapers, they were vertical trusses. In a normal skyscraper, you get heavy steel beams for the maintenance floors; those floors handle the elevator equipment; the mntc floors are ten times stronger than the rest of the floors. WTC laid heavy steel beams in every floor, the entire building was built as a vertical truss, they had to blow it to smithereens just to get it to fall.

    But they went way beyond normal demolition at the WTC. They pulverized the entire structure into dust. Look at the WTC tower demolition; just to get a perspective on how famously these robots are lying to us...

    [​IMG]

    ... no demolition here!

    These robots tell us a commercial jet flew into the ground in Pennsylvania, as if that was possible. A commercial jet breaks up on impact from the slowest of crashes, at 500 miles per hour a commercial jet is turned into a gazilion pieces scattered all over the earth, but there's no such thing as flying into the earth and disappearing.

    Then there's the missing 757 at the Pentagon. The walls didn't collapse until 45 minutes after the crash, so where was the jet?

    NBC - Pentagon video taken before E Ring collapse


    The robots tell us that some landing gear found inside the pentagon is proof of the jet... but all that proves is the pentagon was pulling a false flag, because the wall of the pentagon was completely whole and not one pane of glass in any of the windows was even cracked... so how did the landing gear get inside the building? Of course the robots won't answer the questions.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page