New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

CNN's tanking ratings give it a credibility crisis.

Jen

Senator
In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
So this is what you use to justify CNN's lying?
Okay then. It's clear you don't mind being fed lies.
According to CNN recent ratings plummet.........some people don't want to be lied to.

If other networks (Fox included) consistently lie, their ratings will also plummet.
You and those like you will keep watching because you are apparently fine with the lies because some court in 2003 said it was okay.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
So this is what you use to justify CNN's lying?
Okay then. It's clear you don't mind being fed lies.
According to CNN recent ratings plummet.........some people don't want to be lied to.

If other networks (Fox included) consistently lie, their ratings will also plummet.
You and those like you will keep watching because you are apparently fine with the lies because some court in 2003 said it was okay.

It was a lie. He believed a fake story. Snopes debunked it already 5 plus years ago lol
 

llovejim

Current Champion
Coming from you, your claim that I'm the one with the credibility problem is laugh out loud funny.

I am well aware of politifact's rating system and only a leftie trying to prove a falsehood would rely on it. Needless to say it has serious credibility problems as well, just like most leftie sources. :)
typical trump stooge excuse. politifact, which has won a Pulitzer Prize for excellence in journalism, is the fake media, not fox and trump's bullshit and gateway pundit and infowars and the crap silly ass trump stooges believe without question.

the new right wing mouth breather slogan- vote for trump and watch fox!! it's easier than thinking!!
 

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
typical trump stooge excuse. politifact, which has won a Pulitzer Prize for excellence in journalism,..................
As usual, your facts are severely overstated. PolitiFact won the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for 1 thing...coverage of the 2008 election. You're implication they won it for overall Journalism is laughable, and simply shows you should not enter into discussions with your betters.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
It was a lie. He believed a fake story. Snopes debunked it already 5 plus years ago lol
i thought right wingers thought SNOPES was also a part of the deep state!! funny how much you trust it and politifact and the Washington Post and CNN and factcheck when they occasionally back up what you believe!! fox repeated the lie about stand down orders given at benghazi at least 85 times. fox is a lying piece of shit network. only the dumbest of trump stooges believe fox is anywhere near as accurate as any real news media. those are facts. all your bullshit spewing and unsourced claims are just that- bullshit. fox, mainly hannity, kept inviting the lying Swift Boat Liars on to spew their lies even after real news sources banned them after all their lies and inconsistent stories about what they observed became clearly known, and the fact they were all getting paid pretty good dough to just be paraded around different areas and told to lie on cue.

from Snopes:

(some background- there are about 7 or 8 quotes very negative of Kerry, mainly for talking about how he witnesses soldiers mistreating locals and/or their livestock, not for anything they observed about him in action, since they WERE NOT THERE...except for this guy's comments, who was there-

“My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in ’68 and ’69, involved with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, put our crews in jeopardy… if a man like that can’t handle that 6-man crew boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?”

— Steven Gardner

That said, the piece quoted above, in which a variety of veterans offer their views of John Kerry, isn’t really something that can evaluated as “true” or “false.” It’s true that the men named do exist, that they served in Vietnam, and that they made the statements attributed to them, but the substance of most of these quotes is an expression of opinion, not something objectively classifiable as right or wrong.

The important point to note here is that this piece presents only one side of the story:
  • Although the men quoted above are often identified as “John Kerry’s shipmates,” only one of them, Steven Gardner, actually served under Lt. Kerry’s command on a Swift boat. The other men who served under Kerry’s command continue to speak positively of him:

    “In 1969, I was Sen. Kerry’s gun mate atop of the Swift boat in Vietnam. And I just wanted to let everyone know that, contrary to all the rumors that you might hear from the other side, Sen. Kerry’s blood is red, not blue. I know, I’ve seen it.
    “If it weren’t for Sen. John Kerry, on the 28th of February 1969, the day he won the Silver Star . . . you and I would not be having this conversation. My name would be on a long, black wall in Washington, D.C. I saw this man save my life.”3

    — Fred Short

    “I can still see him now, standing in the doorway of the pilothouse, firing his M-16, shouting orders through the smoke and chaos . . .Even wounded, or confronting sights no man should ever have to see, he never lost his cool.

    I had to sit on my hands [after a firefight], I was shaking so hard . . . He went to every man on that boat and put his arm around them and asked them how they’re doing. I’ve never had an officer do that before or since. That’s the mettle of the man, John Kerry.”3

    — David Alston

    “What I saw back then [in Vietnam] was a guy with genuine caring and leadership ability who was aggressive when he had to be. What I see now is a guy who’s not afraid to tackle tough issues. And he knows what the consequences are of putting people’s kids in harm’s way.”2

    — James Wasser

  • Many of Kerry’s Vietnam commanders and fellow officers also continue to speak positively of him:


    Navy records, fitness reports by Kerry’s commanders and scores of interviews with Swift boat officers and crewmen depict a model officer who fought aggressively in river ambushes and won the respect of many of his crewmates and commanders, even as his doubts about the war grew.
    “I don’t like what he said after the war,” said Adrian Lonsdale, who commanded Kerry for three months in 1969. “But he was a good naval officer.”2



    “I don’t know what conclusions you can draw about someone’s ability to lead from their combat experience, but John’s service was commendable,” said James J. Galvin, a former Swift boat officer . . . “He played by the same rules we all did.”1

  • How well all of these men knew John Kerry is questionable, and discrepancies between how some of them described Kerry thirty-five years ago and how they describe him today suggest that their opinions are largely based upon political differences rather than objective assessments of Kerry’s military record. For example, Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman is quoted above, yet the Los Angeles Times reported:

    . . . Hoffman and Kerry had few direct dealings in Vietnam. A Los Angeles Times examination of Navy archives found that Hoffman praised Kerry’s performance in cabled messages after several river skirmishes.1
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/swift-justice/

A Green Beret who Kerry picked up in the river during a firefight nominated Kerry for a Silver Star, and was disappointed when he only got the Bronze Star-

Rassmann was 21 at the time, a Special Forces lieutenant in charge of a company of American and Chinese fighters. On that day, they traveled on a convoy of five patrol boats led by the 25-year-old Kerry, a Navy lieutenant -- and they were on the run, being chased down the Bay Hap River by enemy soldiers firing guns and rockets.

The group had already lost one soldier that day. As they sped down the river, one boat was blown out of the water, and then another. An explosion wounded Kerry in the arm and threw Rassmann into the river. Rassmann dove to the bottom to avoid being run over by the other boats. When he surfaced, he saw the convoy had gone ahead.

Viet Cong snipers fired at him, and Rassmann submerged over and over to avoid being hit. The bullets came from both banks, and Rassmann had nowhere to go. He began thinking his time had come, but the fifth time he came up, he saw the convoy had turned around. Kerry had ordered the boats back to pick up the man overboard.

Kerry's boat, under heavy fire, sidled up to the struggling soldier. Rassmann tried to scramble up a cargo net at the bow but was too exhausted to make it all the way. He clung to the net as bullets whizzed past.

"Next thing I knew, John came out in the middle of all this," Rassmann says. "I couldn't believe it. He was going to get killed. He ran to the edge, reached over with his good arm [Kerry had been wounded in his right arm] and pulled me over the lip."

Rassmann later recommended Kerry for the Silver Star, and was upset when the Army instead awarded Kerry a lesser Bronze Star with a "V" for valor. The medal citation described Kerry's actions on the river that day.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-mar-13-na-vietnamvet13-story.html
 

llovejim

Current Champion
As usual, your facts are severely overstated. PolitiFact won the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for 1 thing...coverage of the 2008 election. You're implication they won it for overall Journalism is laughable, and simply shows you should not enter into discussions with your betters.
what is the difference? how do you even remember how to breathe? you are insufferably damaged. you cannot understand simple words!! how could somebody win a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting and it not be considered for overall journalism? What kind of a dumbshit attempt at a distinction is that? do you get paid to post such ludicrous crap or would that affect your amateur status?
 

Colorforms

Senator
You guys keep avoiding the facts by pretending Fox tells the truth and everybody else lies.

All you need do is research the court findings...show a denial by Fox or provide a quote from the Court's ruling.

In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
You wouldn't know a fact if it bit your ass.
 

Colorforms

Senator
typical trump stooge excuse. politifact, which has won a Pulitzer Prize for excellence in journalism, is the fake media, not fox and trump's bullshit and gateway pundit and infowars and the crap silly ass trump stooges believe without question.

the new right wing mouth breather slogan- vote for trump and watch fox!! it's easier than thinking!!
Is that the same prize that CNN got for lying to viewers for over two years?

Yeah, figures that you support that kind of propaganda trying to pass itself off as news...and failing. :)
 

llovejim

Current Champion
Is that the same prize that CNN got for lying to viewers for over two years?

Yeah, figures that you support that kind of propaganda trying to pass itself off as news...and failing. :)
name a CNN lie they did not apologize for if it was proven a lie. just one.
 

Colorforms

Senator
name a CNN lie they did not apologize for if it was proven a lie. just one.
It's harder to name something they said that's the truth. Everything from Russian conspiracy to all out treason was nothing but a lie. Everything they tried to hang on Kuchner, all a lie. Even election coverage was nothing but a farce.

The Onion is more accurate than CNN these days.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You guys keep avoiding the facts by pretending Fox tells the truth and everybody else lies.

You're trying to change the edited subject. We're saying that Fox reports facts. The other networks are nothing but left wing racist opinion rags.

You've lost another argument, because you have no edited idea what you're talking about.
I've proven you wrong, once again
Fox argued in court that they are not bound to report facts....and you ignored that.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
It's harder to name something they said that's the truth. Everything from Russian conspiracy to all out treason was nothing but a lie. Everything they tried to hang on Kuchner, all a lie. Even election coverage was nothing but a farce.

The Onion is more accurate than CNN these days.
what a freaking gutless comment. typical trump stooge reaction when told to put up or shut up- they jellyfish their way out of their bullshit claims. prove it, you got the talking part over with. the Mueller Report made clear all the real media stories about obvious collusion and obvious Russian interference were 100% accurate!! and the examples of real crimes- at least 5 cases of trump obstructing justice, were so evident even Fox's own legal expert Judge Napolitano agreed and said he should be indicted, sitting president or not!! even fox's guy!! and you're acting like toady gutless wimp AG Barr when he said- Nothing to see here- I see nothing!! Nothing!!

what a dishonest partisan hack you have to be to still deny how corrupt and dishonest the whole Trump team is, from top to bottom.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
what a freaking gutless comment. typical trump stooge reaction when told to put up or shut up- they jellyfish their way out of their bullshit claims. prove it, you got the talking part over with. the Mueller Report made clear all the real media stories about obvious collusion and obvious Russian interference were 100% accurate!! and the examples of real crimes- at least 5 cases of trump obstructing justice, were so evident even Fox's own legal expert Judge Napolitano agreed and said he should be indicted, sitting president or not!! even fox's guy!! and you're acting like toady gutless wimp AG Barr when he said- Nothing to see here- I see nothing!! Nothing!!

what a dishonest partisan hack you have to be to still deny how corrupt and dishonest the whole Trump team is, from top to bottom.

Jim, besides your name calling profane idiocy - (and your obsession with Judge Nap lol) Thought that was gone weeks ago.

Why wasn't Trump Subpoenaed ? - As he could have

Why wasn't this supposed 'obstruction taken to Fed Court to clear up?

Reason ? No Probable Cause.

It was all a dog and pony show for my most demented , profane, morons of my base.
Understand now ?
 
Top