Conway/Trump threaten to prosecute Hillary if she seeks recount

[Bugsy McGurk]

As Trump has the USA further descending into banana republic status....

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11/27/trump-threatens-prosecute-hillary-clinton-pursues-election-recount.html

 

[worldlymrb]

Wasn't it your old watch horse who said challenging an election was a threat to democracy?

If we are to believe what the habitual liar said, anyone threatening democracy should be arrested.. no?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Wasn't it your old watch horse who said challenging an election was a threat to democracy?

http://www.weaselzippers.us/309876-hillary-1-month-ago-you-have-to-accept-the-election-results-or-youre-threatening-democracy/

If we are to believe what the habitual liar said, anyone threatening democracy should be arrested.. no?

This is about the Conway/Trump threat to prosecute. Try to pay attention.

 

[worldlymrb]

This is about the Conway/Trump threat to prosecute. Try to pay attention.

Uhh. And Hillary said anyone who challenged the election results was a threat to democracy.

If you have a 1st grade comprehension level than go somewhere where you can post in crayons.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Uhh. And Hillary said anyone who challenged the election results was a threat to democracy.

If you have a 1st grade comprehension level than go somewhere where you can post in crayons.

You just can't focus your mind. Too much GOP ADD.

 

[worldlymrb]

You just can't focus your mind. Too much GOP ADD.

I'm posting to a two year old in arrested development.

Should I post in pretty colors to see if you can comprehend?

Hillary said anyone who challenged the election results WAS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY! Doesn't it make sense to prosecute anyone who threatens democracy like Hillary herself admits she's doing?

 

[as seen on tv]

its his right to prosecute her for FOIA destruction of evidence, and misuse of the Clinton Foundation, irrespective of her position on the recount.

he's not alleging that the recount itself is a crime. only that he may rescind his previous amnesty is she seeks to nullify the election results, or sow unwarranted doubt on the integrity of the election.

 

[Craig]

I'm posting to a two year old in arrested development.

Should I post in pretty colors to see if you can comprehend?

Hillary said anyone who challenged the election results WAS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY! Doesn't it make sense to prosecute anyone who threatens democracy like Hillary herself admits she's doing?

You bang the same drum, repeatedly, while you fail to consider one important aspect. The actual, final, results are not yet in. Recounts are part of the process...and on very rare occasion, change the results. These swing states were close...close enough to warrant a second look.

I doubt any state changes in these recounts, but they are just part of the political process.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

I'm posting to a two year old in arrested development.

Should I post in pretty colors to see if you can comprehend?

Hillary said anyone who challenged the election results WAS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY! Doesn't it make sense to prosecute anyone who threatens democracy like Hillary herself admits she's doing?

No, that's not what Hillary said, but "threatening democracy" is not a crime in any event.

Is there ANY chance you can focus your mind on the Conway/Trump threat?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

its his right to prosecute her for FOIA destruction of evidence, and misuse of the Clinton Foundation, irrespective of her position on the recount.

he's not alleging that the recount itself is a crime. only that he may rescind his previous amnesty is she seeks to nullify the election results, or sow unwarranted doubt on the integrity of the election.

In other words, he's threatening to prosecute her if she cooperates with the recount.

No biggie?

;-)

 

[Craig]

its his right to prosecute her for FOIA destruction of evidence, and misuse of the Clinton Foundation, irrespective of her position on the recount.

he's not alleging that the recount itself is a crime. only that he may rescind his previous amnesty is she seeks to nullify the election results, or sow unwarranted doubt on the integrity of the election.

Sow unwarranted doubt? Like saying millions of illegals voted?

 

[Dawg]

Maybe pictures will have libs understand exactly what illary said:

of course she said that when she thought there were no chance of her losing.........

Se Bill jumping for joy:

 

[Dawg]

In other words, he's threatening to prosecute her if she cooperates with the recount.

No biggie?

;-)

before recount there will have to go to Court........

http://www.inquisitr.com/3747002/2016-recount-jill-stein-cannot-file-direct-request-for-recount-in-pennsylvania-must-take-it-to-court/

Stein has the perfect scam to raise $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ illary needs another bottle of champagne ☻

 

[Dawg]

Sow unwarranted doubt? Like saying millions of illegals voted?

Θ told illegals to vote...........appears they did

 

[justoffal]

Uhh. And Hillary said anyone who challenged the election results was a threat to democracy.

If you have a 1st grade comprehension level than go somewhere where you can post in crayons.

IT"S DIFFERENT....

JO

 

[Mr. Friscus]

As Trump has the USA further descending into banana republic status....

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11/27/trump-threatens-prosecute-hillary-clinton-pursues-election-recount.html

I'm fine with prosecuting Clinton.

If she didn't do anything wrong, she should have nothing to hide.

Right?

 

[Barbella]

its his right to prosecute her for FOIA destruction of evidence, and misuse of the Clinton Foundation, irrespective of her position on the recount.

he's not alleging that the recount itself is a crime. only that he may rescind his previous amnesty is she seeks to nullify the election results, or sow unwarranted doubt on the integrity of the election.

I'd do the same thing. She wants to be a bitch, he'll fix her ass... LOL

 

[Barbella]

Sow unwarranted doubt? Like saying millions of illegals voted?

Of course. Why wouldn't illegals vote? Obama himself encouraged them...

That's NOT "unwarranted doubt".

 

[NinaS]

Sow unwarranted doubt? Like saying millions of illegals voted?

Seems like Trump himself has been 'sowing' a fine seam himself. Check his Twitter rants.

 

[NinaS]

Of course. Why wouldn't illegals vote? Obama himself encouraged them...

That's NOT "unwarranted doubt".

PURE BULLSHIT.