New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Cop FIRED for having racist memorabilia in his HOME!!!!

FakeName

Governor
The Supreme court ruling shot your point down years ago.
it ruled that the police are not legally obligated to protect anyone.
Oops.

Dude you are continuing to miss the point.

My point was that he was fired because he could no longer be trusted to do his job equally.

Your supreme Court ruling is irrelevant to that point.

I used the Phrase "to protect and serve," because it is painted on the doors but it is tangential to my point.

My point was trust.

Your supreme Court ruling is irrelevant to that.

Now do you understand?
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
Oops.

Dude you are continuing to miss the point.

My point was that he was fired because he could no longer be trusted to do his job equally.

Your supreme Court ruling is irrelevant to that point.

I used the Phrase "to protect and serve," because it is painted on the doors but it is tangential to my point.

My point was trust.

Your supreme Court ruling is irrelevant to that.

Now do you understand?
The supreme court overrules your point
If you have issues take it up with them. and stop whining
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
No.

That was clearly not my point.

Sheesh!

Try to understand it.

I was quite clear and have explained it to you several times since.
Here was your point
Cops are supposed to protect and serve all people.
Cops are supposed to protect and serve all people.

If they have an animosity to a particular group of people then they cannot be trusted to protect and serve equally, in other words they cannot be trusted to do the job we are paying them for.

This they MUST be fired.
The U.S. Supreme Court over ruled your point and made it irrelevant
Cops are not legally obligated to protect anyone.
 
Top