New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Coulter: “The SAME MEDIA gasping in horror at “P*ssy” sure didn’t mind my being called a C*nt

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeilaniMP

Empress
As we have seen time and time again, if the left didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any, at all.

They thought it was hilarious when Coulter was called the C word, but are all aghast over Trump saying "p*ssy"?

Give me a freaking break....

The SAME MEDIA gasping in horror at “P*ssy” sure didn’t mind my being called a C*nt repeatedly”



*Please note graphic language throughout the column.*

Donald Trump
<img src="http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=anncoulter-20&l=am2&o=1&a=0735214468" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0"/> is the only hope to save America, so the media have gone to war to stop him.

They don’t care about being exposed as lying, hypocritical swine — I’d describe them more fully, but it would require locker room talk. They’ll win the public back later. Right now, all that matters is stopping Trump.

The same media that are pretending to consider the use of a bad word equivalent to rape don’t give a fig about real rape, real sexual assault, real whoring, even real homicide, depending on who did it.

JFK was an STD-infected drug addict who cavorted with whores at the White House, but the media ferociously hid all this from the public, publishing fairy-tale versions of his presidency as “Camelot.”

And what happened to the 11-year rule? Trump said the word “p*ssy” 11 years ago, in a secretly recorded conversation. Eleven years before Sen. Teddy Kennedy ran for president, he killed a girl — but he ran, not only without apology, but, indeed, as the Conscience of the Democratic Party.

Throughout 2009, good, decent Americans who happened to oppose Obamacare were called the name of a gay sex act hundreds of times on TV — and that was just on MSNBC. CNN’s Anderson Cooper made the reference explicit when he giggled, “It’s hard to talk when you’re tea-bagging.”

Among the people using this sexual slur were distinguished members of Congress such as U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez and Rep. Barney Frank. Were they fit to hold office?

Going way, way, way back to a few weeks ago, the same media gasping in horror at “p*ssy” sure didn’t mind my being called a c*nt repeatedly on a Comedy Central broadcast. And when I say “didn’t mind,” I mean they thought it was awesome.

But saying “p*ssy” 11 years ago is over the line.

Cut the crap, media.

A few years ago, Sen. Al Franken joked on a Comedy Central roast about producer Rob Reiner butt-f*cking his children. Does Hillary think he’s fit to be a U.S. senator? Is he fit enough for the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, but not the Senate Finance Committee?

None of these were leaks of secretly recorded conversations — considered a hanging offense in the Clinton years. These vulgarities were intentionally, publicly broadcast by the same media that, today, pretend to need smelling salts after hearing “p*ssy.”

At least this new puritanical standard explains why rappers like Jay Z are banned from the White House. Wait — what?

Perhaps realizing their Victorian virgin act wasn’t cutting it, the media turned to their Pretend We Don’t Understand English method of argument, and claimed that Trump was confessing to having committed a “sexual assault”!

Trump said: “When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do any of that. (Laughter.)” Journalists turned this into “sexual assault” by being literal on the “grab” part, non-figurative on the “you” part — and on the “they let you do it” part? Stone, cold deaf.

If “they let you do it,” it’s not an assault.

Like most of Trump’s bragging, his loutish boast was not intended to be taken seriously, nor was it. Far from whipping out his pencil and carefully taking notes, “Access Hollywood”‘s Billy Bush laughed. The gist of what Trump was saying is that — hold onto your hats! — women like to sleep with celebrities! I don’t know if you’ve heard that before.

At least we’re back to the media pretending to care about sexual assault — until further notice.

This is the same media that ran interference for an actual sexual predator
<img src="http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=anncoulter-20&l=am2&o=1&a=0895261138" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0"/> in the White House, ignoring Bill Clinton’s serial pants-dropping, groping and raping for nearly a decade, while gleefully vilifying his accusers, and would have been happy to continue if Bill Richardson had become president. Clinton talking about p*ssy was one of his more dignified moments, proudly attested to by his friend Vernon Jordan in a nationally broadcast interview with Mike Wallace.

In the pages of The New York Times, feminist icon Gloria Steinem announced the “one-free grope” rule, specially developed forthe Clinton era
<img src="http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=anncoulter-20&l=am2&o=1&a=0895261138" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>.

Former Time magazine correspondent Nina Burleigh said of Clinton, “I would be happy to give him a bl*w job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”

Time magazine’s Margaret Carlson said Linda Tripp had “lost membership in the family of man” for secretly tape-recording Monica Lewinsky. Tripp kept the recordings not for something so exalted as stopping Trump, but to protect herself from a charge of perjury.

Even when the law began to close in on the horny hick — midway through the second term he won because of the media’s heroic self-censorship — the rest of us had to spend a year listening to liberals say “Guys like bl*w jobs,” “Everybody does it” and “Let’s move on.”

When Clinton was credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick, NBC strategically held the story — until a week after the Senate had voted in the rapist’s impeachment trial. All the public could do was helplessly sport “Free Lisa Myers” buttons, referring to the investigative reporter who got the interview.

Explaining NBC’s incomprehensible decision to hold its own investigative report, Myers told Broaddrick: “The good news is you’re credible. The bad news is that you’re very credible.”

At least NBC ran the story eventually. The name “Juanita Broaddrick” never crossed the lips of “CBS Evening News” anchor Dan Rather.

Asked by FNC’s Bill O’Reilly why he never got around to mentioning that the commander in chief was, more likely than not, a rapist, Rather said, “When the charge has something to do with somebody’s private sex life, I would prefer not to run any of it.”

So according to our media, committing a rape is “somebody’s private sex life,” but using a bad word is rape.

Poor Billy Bush has to be fired from NBC’s “Today” show so the media can pretend that Trump’s using bawdy language is a very, very serious offense.

Meanwhile, Billy’s ex-president uncle and cousin openly fraternize with the rapist. The second President Bush calls Bill Clinton his “brother from another mother” and praises Clinton’s “character” — something even Clinton’s defenders never did with a straight face.

Now the networks are holding casting calls for some loon willing to falsely accuse Trump of sexual assault, so they can hype it like the Duke lacrosse case, Mattress Girl and Rolling Stone’s fraternity rape. Unfortunately — for us, fortunately for the media — by the time the truth comes out, the election will be over.
 
Last edited:

Arkady

President
As we have seen time and time again, if the left didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any, at all.

They thought it was hilarious when Coulter was called the C word, but are all aghast over Trump saying "p*ssy"?
Perhaps you can answer a question for me. What causes right-wingers to miss the point here so badly? People aren't aghast over Trump saying that word. They're aghast about him bragging about sexual assault. If he'd made the exact same comment, but instead phrased it as being able to get away with grabbing women's "vulvas," the comment would be just as bad. How can right-wingers possibly not understand that? Nobody gives a shit if Trump uses vulgar language in private settings. It's the fact that he thought there was nothing wrong with boasting about his star status supposedly giving him the right to kiss and grope women without their permission.
 

justoffal

Senator
Perhaps you can answer a question for me. What causes right-wingers to miss the point here so badly? People aren't aghast over Trump saying that word. They're aghast about him bragging about sexual assault. If he'd made the exact same comment, but instead phrased it as being able to get away with grabbing women's "vulvas," the comment would be just as bad. How can right-wingers possibly not understand that? Nobody gives a shit if Trump uses vulgar language in private settings. It's the fact that he thought there was nothing wrong with boasting about his star status supposedly giving him the right to kiss and grope women without their permission.
Bullshit....they are all Faux and no show.....if they were sincerely concerned about assault Hillary's husband would be the end of her in the DEM party.

At the very least she could have left him.

JO
 

Corruptbuddha

Governor
Bill Clinton is, at least by reputation, a predator. So is Donald Trump. You know the difference?

Trump is running for President, Bill is NOT.
 

LeilaniMP

Empress
Bill Clinton is, at least by reputation, a predator. So is Donald Trump. You know the difference?

Trump is running for President, Bill is NOT.
Trump made the comments 11 years ago, when he was NOT running for president.

Bill was groping and molesting women when he WAS the president, and is still up to his old tricks.
 

Corruptbuddha

Governor
Trump made the comments 11 years ago, when he was NOT running for president.

Bill was groping and molesting women when he WAS the president, and is still up to his old tricks.

What Bill did in the 90's has ZERO influence on the race today. Seeing as how Trump is vying for the office, his actions DO influence the race AND THEY SHOULD.
 

LeilaniMP

Empress
What Bill did in the 90's has ZERO influence on the race today. Seeing as how Trump is vying for the office, his actions DO influence the race AND THEY SHOULD.
Nope.

Bill's Enabler in Chief and head attack dog is running for president.

She's complicit in his behavior, as well as a slew of other crimes and nefarious activities, thus not worthy of being POTUS.
 
Perhaps you can answer a question for me. What causes right-wingers to miss the point here so badly? People aren't aghast over Trump saying that word. They're aghast about him bragging about sexual assault. If he'd made the exact same comment, but instead phrased it as being able to get away with grabbing women's "vulvas," the comment would be just as bad. How can right-wingers possibly not understand that? Nobody gives a shit if Trump uses vulgar language in private settings. It's the fact that he thought there was nothing wrong with boasting about his star status supposedly giving him the right to kiss and grope women without their permission.
Make war, not love!

- Democrats, 2016
 

Corruptbuddha

Governor
Nope.

Bill's Enabler in Chief and head attack dog is running for president.

She's complicit in his behavior, as well as a slew of other crimes and nefarious activities, thus not worthy of being POTUS.

How is she complicit in his behavior? Because she defended her husband? Is defending your husband a no-no?

Maybe you should tell that to Melania Trump?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/melania-trump-threatens-to-sue-people-magazine/

She's issuing threats as we speak.
 

Arkady

President
Bullshit....they are all Faux and no show.....if they were sincerely concerned about assault Hillary's husband would be the end of her in the DEM party.

At the very least she could have left him.

JO
You're missing the point here. In the case of Bill Clinton, there's no evidence. It's just a he-said/she-said situation, so it comes down to who you believe. In the case of Trump, Trump himself provided the evidence: he bragged about doing exactly what he's been accused of doing. If we had Bill Clinton, on tape, saying that because he's a star he can do anything, including grabbing women's pussies, then that would put great weight of evidence in favor of any woman who'd said he did that to her. But that's just not the case with Clinton. It's only the case with Trump.

As for whether Hillary should have left Bill, I'll leave that to them. I'm old fashioned enough to think marriage is important, and so I respect her for being able to swallow her pride and fight to hold the family together after his infidelity.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Nope.

Bill's Enabler in Chief and head attack dog is running for president.

She's complicit in his behavior, as well as a slew of other crimes and nefarious activities, thus not worthy of being POTUS.
Wow...what a conundrum for you. Being accused is equivalent to being convicted and therefore Melania is an enabler and is certainly guilty of being an illegal immigrant...and her soft core porn pictures must just about make your head explode.....

She is Trump's enabler in chief......:)
 

reason10

Governor
Perhaps you can answer a question for me. What causes right-wingers to miss the point here so badly? People aren't aghast over Trump saying that word. They're aghast about him bragging about sexual assault. If he'd made the exact same comment, but instead phrased it as being able to get away with grabbing women's "vulvas," the comment would be just as bad. How can right-wingers possibly not understand that? Nobody gives a shit if Trump uses vulgar language in private settings. It's the fact that he thought there was nothing wrong with boasting about his star status supposedly giving him the right to kiss and grope women without their permission.
Nobody is missing the point. Most of the sexual accusations are false and have been proven to be false. So far, the Reuters polls says the tape has not affected the support for Trump from women.

The point is, the Clinton Gestapo is releasing fake accusation after fake accusation because the Wikileaks dump is the smoking gun to Hillary's FELONIES. It's all she can do. If she fails, SHE IS GOING TO PRISON.

She's running for a lot more than just a position she believes she's entitled to. She's running to avoid the orange jumpsuit, because

THIS BITCH IS A [Unwelcome language removed] CRIMINAL.
 

Saladin2

Senator
Supporting Member
Nope.

Bill's Enabler in Chief and head attack dog is running for president.

She's complicit in his behavior, as well as a slew of other crimes and nefarious activities, thus not worthy of being POTUS.
LOL.....Bill loses my vote....Millions see Trump for the pervert he is...No wonder he is fading in the polls
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top