New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Dem debate rundown

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
Nobody here has suggested any hate. All we're doing is definition of character. This is the most batsheet crazy group of Democrats in a generation.

The D group this season is more radical and anti-American than the USSR. They are making Trump's landslide reelection easy. He doesn't even need to hold rallies (although that continent sized ego of his won't allow him to forego them). He can just repeat what they have said at the debates and it's over.
I love your confidence. It's exactly what killed us in 2016 and you in 2012.

We will see. : )
 

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
The confidence is well deserved. Trump has the best record in history, the best economy, the best foreign trade, the best employment stats. Good Democrat candidates would have a tough time running up against that.

These candidates aren't even close to good.

Trump's numbers in the Republican Party are around 94 percent, and several states have cancelled their primaries because there's no need. Trump OWNS his base. And he hasn't had to spend any campaign cash to do so.

The Democrat candidates are lucky if they can get 30 percent poll numbers with their party. They are burning through campaign cash. And they are so lame that they can barely draw 30 people at a rally. Trump turns away over 3000 at his rallies.

I don't see things changing. I DO see Trump making life miserable for Democrats in California, (not enough for them to lose their seats, but for them to have to spend campaign cash.) He's going there to campaign and spotlight the huge homelessness problem.

And to let you in on a not too secret thought, we weren't as confident that Romney would get elected. The man was a pussy. He didn't have the balls to go after Obama OR the lying media. We would have been surprised if he had won.
Blah blah blah...

We will see. : )
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
It isn't an aspect of this debate.

She fits right on the capitalist/socialist spectrum.

Bernie identifies as a socialist she does not.
.you don't have to like it, nor do you have to like her policies, but saying she is either nuts or liar is just false.

It makes you part of the problem.

Let's get back to being adults.
LOL! So does Bernie Sanders! So does Victor Maduro, for that matter. Being "on the spectrum" between capitalism and socialism doesn't render someone a capitalist - the way they are trying to push the needle does. And every policy she favors, every "plan" she has, moves that needle in one direction and one direction only - (way) to the left. Only a liar or a fool would suggest that simply existing "on the spectrum" between capitalism and socialism renders one either one or the other.

Make this easy on us - list the policy differences between Warren and Sanders and lets examine just how "capitalist" she is. If she is indeed a capitalist, the differences are going to be numerous and substantive. We're waiting...
 

Nostra

Governor
It isn't an aspect of this debate.

She fits right on the capitalist/socialist spectrum.

Bernie identifies as a socialist she does not.
.you don't have to like it, nor do you have to like her policies, but saying she is either nuts or liar is just false.

It makes you part of the problem.

Let's get back to being adults.
Yeah, here is her spectrum:

Captitalist: When it comes to her personal finances.

Socialist: When it comes to everyone else's finances.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Yep.

She had always been told she was part Indian.

She retold that.

Trump lies about all things big and small, just about every day.

Is your outrage selective or what?
Wouldn't a decent person get some sort of confirmation before using it to advance their career? What kind of miscreant claims a minority preference based on family lore????
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Yep.

She had always been told she was part Indian.

She retold that.

Trump lies about all things big and small, just about every day.

Is your outrage selective or what?
and as a grown adult female didn't bother to find out if she was or wasn't...….how long before she claims she killed pale faces?
 

FakeName

Governor
Wouldn't a decent person get some sort of confirmation before using it to advance their career? What kind of miscreant claims a minority preference based on family lore????
She didn't use it to advance her career.

Quit repeating lies.

"the Globe, in a separate, lengthy article about Warren’s rise in academia, said that it interviewed “a wide range of professors and administrators who recruited or worked with Warren” who all “said her ethnic background played no role in her hiring.”

Those interviewed included Stephen B. Burbank, a Penn Law School professor who recommended hiring Warren, Hank Gutman, the chair of the school’s appointments committee at the time Warren was recruited, and Robert H. Mundheim, the dean who hired Warren at Penn.

All three men said they were unaware that Warren, a nationally recognized scholar in bankruptcy and commercial law, claimed to be part American Indian.

Charles Fried, a former U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, also vouched for Warren. Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who was on the appointments committee that recommended hiring Warren in 1995, told the Herald that Warren’s heritage never came up during the hiring process there.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he was quoted saying.

In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.”
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/12/elizabeth-warrens-pocahontas-controversy/
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Really? She used it to steal the spot of a legitimate minority to get into Harvard.

You don't think a Harvard degree advances a career?
She's as guilty as the Hollywood stars getting their kids into colleges, she lied and took the seat of a real Indian!
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
She didn't use it to advance her career.

Quit repeating lies.

"the Globe, in a separate, lengthy article about Warren’s rise in academia, said that it interviewed “a wide range of professors and administrators who recruited or worked with Warren” who all “said her ethnic background played no role in her hiring.”

Those interviewed included Stephen B. Burbank, a Penn Law School professor who recommended hiring Warren, Hank Gutman, the chair of the school’s appointments committee at the time Warren was recruited, and Robert H. Mundheim, the dean who hired Warren at Penn.

All three men said they were unaware that Warren, a nationally recognized scholar in bankruptcy and commercial law, claimed to be part American Indian.

Charles Fried, a former U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, also vouched for Warren. Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who was on the appointments committee that recommended hiring Warren in 1995, told the Herald that Warren’s heritage never came up during the hiring process there.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he was quoted saying.

In a 2012 statement released through Harvard, Fried added: “Elizabeth Warren was recruited (she did not apply — one does not apply for these positions) to be a tenured professor at Harvard because she was preeminent in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, two fields in which we had strong teaching needs.”
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/12/elizabeth-warrens-pocahontas-controversy/
Left wing factcheck says it so it must be true…LOL! Simple logic says if she didn't use it to burnish her leftist academia bona fides, no one would know about her little "family lore."

Did Harvard recruit her based on her claimed status as a "native american" educator? I bet the answer is you better believe it most certainly was...
 

FakeName

Governor
Left wing factcheck says it so it must be true…LOL! Simple logic says if she didn't use it to burnish her leftist academia bona fides, no one would know about her little "family lore."

Did Harvard recruit her based on her claimed status as a "native american" educator? I bet the answer is you better believe it most certainly was...
The answer is no.

You just proved you didn't even read my post, or the proof cited.

If you had you would have already known the answer.

Try again.

Get back to me after you've actually read it.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
The answer is no.

You just proved you didn't even read my post, or the proof cited.

If you had you would have already known the answer.

Try again.

Get back to me after you've actually read it.
"Factcheck" dot org is a left wing propaganda outlet. I don't have to read it to know that it's lying...
 

FakeName

Governor
"Factcheck" dot org is a left wing propaganda outlet. I don't have to read it to know that it's lying...
No, it isn't propaganda.

Everything there is cited and varafiable.

You seriously need to work on being able to distinguish fact from fiction.

You are being played.

Your country deserves better.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
No, it isn't propaganda.

Everything there is cited and varafiable.

You seriously need to work on being able to distinguish fact from fiction.

You are being played.

Your country deserves better.
He was an Officer in the AF, what's your MOS________________? He served his country!
How do you get away with posting of the member instead of the topic?
 

FakeName

Governor
He was an Officer in the AF, what's your MOS________________? He served his country!
How do you get away with posting of the member instead of the topic?
What in the world are you talking about?

Who was an air force officer and what does that have to do with the subject?

My post was on the subject.

Yours is not.
 
Top