I see that now. #1. My opinion on the matter should be well known here, and #2. It's none of his business what my opinion is.You have to vote to see it.
I see that now. #1. My opinion on the matter should be well known here, and #2. It's none of his business what my opinion is.You have to vote to see it.
Join us when you sober up!Doesn't say who voted for what, so what's your point? Just trying to slime someone who votes differently than you?
Well fine. But ....... you did sort of look foolish there with that ranting.I see that now. #1. My opinion on the matter should be well known here, and #2. It's none of his business what my opinion is.
I looked like you? DANG!!!Well fine. But ....... you did sort of look foolish there with that ranting.
I guess so.I looked like you? DANG!!!
I guess you forgot already that you said I looked "foolish". Dementia?I guess so.
(whatever that's supposed to mean)
Oh you did look foolish. And you don't seem to be able to stop yourself now.I guess you forgot already that you said I looked "foolish". Dementia?
Depends who the mother is. If this is the mother, hell yea, off the kid wheneverOk, folks, time to 'man up' (deal with the phrase if you don't like it).
Do you support the right to abort a child at the moment of delivery?
That moment being defined as 'woman is in labor' and/or 'cervix is dilated-dilating' and/or 'head is crowning'?
The recent bill signed into law in New York allows this. The recent bill tabled in committee in Virginia allows this.
There is no MAYBE, or IT DEPENDS. Either you do, or do not.
then why are you in the fvcking thread, dumbass?I see that now. #1. My opinion on the matter should be well known here, and #2. It's none of his business what my opinion is.
You're talking to liberals and what appears to be men. Double stupidity, especially when it comes down to knowing anything about a woman's body or abortion.So, since I disagree with you I am a hypocrite and phony.
I get it.
Whatever............
These men also apparently think they can intimidate me into silence.You're talking to liberals and what appears to be men. Double stupidity, especially when it comes down to knowing anything about a woman's body or abortion.
Yes.Basically, what this thread proves is that most liberals here are in favor of
abortion 'up until the moment of delivery' as define in the OP.
If they were not, they'd publicly vote NO.
Fvcking cowards, the lot of you.
If you don't have room for under which situation the abortion takes place then how do you expect a real answer.Ok, folks, time to 'man up' (deal with the phrase if you don't like it).
Do you support the right to abort a child at the moment of delivery?
That moment being defined as 'woman is in labor' and/or 'cervix is dilated-dilating' and/or 'head is crowning'?
The recent bill signed into law in New York allows this. The recent bill tabled in committee in Virginia allows this.
There is no MAYBE, or IT DEPENDS. Either you do, or do not.
How would you know either of those two things? You're making excuses for the fact that you support infanticide. Shame on you.If you don't have room for under which situation the abortion takes place then how do you expect a real answer.
Let's say the woman will die giving birth to a child that will only live a week. Do you think she should be required to give up all of year remaining years of life for the child's 1 week of life ?
So if it is only yes or no.
Then the answer is yes. I do.
RW science denial continues apace. How could an OB/GYN possibly know anything about pregnancy?How would you know either of those two things? You're making excuses for the fact that you support infanticide. Shame on you.
you obviously did not read the OP.If you don't have room for under which situation the abortion takes place then how do you expect a real answer.
Let's say the woman will die giving birth to a child that will only live a week. Do you think she should be required to give up all of year remaining years of life for the child's 1 week of life ?
So if it is only yes or no.
Then the answer is yes. I do.
the fvckwad did not read the OP. The conditions were spelled out quite clearly.How would you know either of those two things? You're making excuses for the fact that you support infanticide. Shame on you.
And the OP dishonestly connected those completely unrealistic conditions with the New York and Virginia laws that apply to the real-life situations the poster talked about.the fvckwad did not read the OP. The conditions were spelled out quite clearly.