Republicans are not the traitors. Far from hysterics, Democrats see the now-famous ‘Letter to Iran’ as a multiple gift:
1. Accuse Republicans of the crime Democrats owned throughout the 20th century. Indeed, every UN-loving Democrat has been committing treason for so long they could all be hanged as traitors without benefit of a trial.
2. Most importantly, the Letter to Iran shifts the topic of treason away from the Chicago sewer rat who has been betraying this country from the day he took office.
3. The media is using the government shutdown template to blame Republicans.
Democrats turned the US Senate into a nest of traitors the day the United Nations opened for business. The linked Washington Times article told us that the Logan Act is never enforced. Worse still, the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945 made the crime of treason un-punishable.
Hang ‘em high
If not hanging Democrats for the crime of treason en masse, at least the sewer rat, John Kerry, and Nancy Pelosi should do the rope-dance as a token of judicial sincerity. I would go so far as to hang the late, unlamented, Ted Kennedy in absentia:
Ted Kennedy would be proud of the sewer rat:
I never thought I would live long enough to see American traitors sweating.
The answer to the question is obvious: THE UNITED NATIONS. To be more precise Democrats fear that their protection is running out of gas.
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
NOTE: The Chicago sewer rat handing the Iran Deal to the United Nations Security Council gave him full protection under the Organizations Immunities Act.
UN-loving traitors now have to be thinking there is a good chance that treason committed for the United Nations can be prosecuted because of:
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
This next question was an easy one:
Answer: Every American official that puts the United Nations ahead of their own country.
NOTE: John Kerry was not a government official when he committed treason for North Vietnamese Communists, but maybe there is a chance to nail him for his activities on behalf of the United Nations after he became a government official. What the hell, it really doesn’t matter what he gets hanged for if he is guilty.
Treason never prospered more than it does in the United Nations. Ovid never imagined anything like the United Nations coming; so allow me to bring his observation up to date with a suggestion.
Wouldn’t it be sweet if larceny itself became a hanging offense when it is connected to treason; i.e. government officials taking money from foreign governments. And my heart is pounding at the prospect of hanging all of those damn charity hustlers who send tax dollars to United Nations agencies. It’s just a crying shame those foreign UN charity hustlers living on American tax dollars can’t be hanged right alongside America’s traitors.
Incidentally, did you ever wonder why the UN’s phoney judicial system does not have a death penalty? I always wondered what the punishment is for UN officials who betray the UN? I don’t think there is one. Betraying an organization is much different than is betraying one’s country. The day might come when the UN becomes a global government; so I’d like to see how they handle treason.
Presidents, popes, & treason
Presidents can and should be hanged for treason. As far as I know, the Roman Catholic Church does not hang popes for their little indiscretions. Maybe that’s why Taqiyya sold himself as a spiritual leader. After all, how can you hang a guy for his morality. That’s why Americans better stop thinking about their presidents the same way Roman Catholics think about their popes —— loved by one and all.
In fact, a vast majority of the people in the world do not give a flying f--- for popes or presidents. Yet somehow unctuous religious fanatics are certain that their leader being universally loved will have everyone else rushing to convert to whatever ideology they promote.
And have you noticed that only living Roman Catholic popes, and living American presidents, run the universal love con. You can stretch it a bit and include Boo’s guy, the Dalai Lama, but you sure as hell don’t see Communists, or Muslims, putting up one of their guys for universal adoration. Hell, I don’t think they have a candidate! At least not a living one. Generally speaking their guys are dead; Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mohammad.
Parenthetically, conquerors never expected to be loved. They settled for executing anyone who criticized them. Coerced love worked pretty well because there were not too many people running around calling Genghis Kahn or Julius Caesar douche bags. Adolf Hitler was a 20th century conqueror who might have combined loving him voluntarily with the chopping block. Of course, everything except the chopping block would have fallen apart after he died.
And when was it decided that the American president had to be a spiritual leader rather than simply being a straightforward political leader? And who made that decision? Speaking for myself, when I feel the need to kiss a ring I’ll go see a local Bible-thumper, or hop on a plane to Rome.
Now don’t get me wrong here, a president being a decent man with a spiritual nature isn’t a bad thing even if he engages in a bit of preaching from the bully pulpit whenever the mood moves him; so long as he doesn’t dip into the public purse to payoff pious Socialist frauds. That’s exactly what is happening with HillaryCare II. Our Chicago sewer rat cum universal-spiritual-leader is going to throw as much money at his pals as he can before the ACA is repealed.
1. Accuse Republicans of the crime Democrats owned throughout the 20th century. Indeed, every UN-loving Democrat has been committing treason for so long they could all be hanged as traitors without benefit of a trial.
2. Most importantly, the Letter to Iran shifts the topic of treason away from the Chicago sewer rat who has been betraying this country from the day he took office.
3. The media is using the government shutdown template to blame Republicans.
Democrats turned the US Senate into a nest of traitors the day the United Nations opened for business. The linked Washington Times article told us that the Logan Act is never enforced. Worse still, the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945 made the crime of treason un-punishable.
Hang ‘em high
If not hanging Democrats for the crime of treason en masse, at least the sewer rat, John Kerry, and Nancy Pelosi should do the rope-dance as a token of judicial sincerity. I would go so far as to hang the late, unlamented, Ted Kennedy in absentia:
Nancy Pelosi, as speaker of the House, traveled to Syria to negotiate with President Bashar Assad of Syria over the objections of President George W. Bush, and the late Sen. Ted Kennedy in 1983 importuned Yuri Andropov, the leader of the Soviet Union, to help him prevent President Ronald Reagan from negotiating a missile treaty with Moscow.
A memorandum in the Soviet files, uncovered after the fall of the Soviet Union, described how the head of the KGB, Kennedy and John Tunney, a Democratic senator from California, tried to enlist Andropov in their effort to halt the deployment of missiles to Europe and weaken Mr. Reagan in anticipation of the presidential election of 1984.
According to the KGB memorandum, "Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA."
A memorandum in the Soviet files, uncovered after the fall of the Soviet Union, described how the head of the KGB, Kennedy and John Tunney, a Democratic senator from California, tried to enlist Andropov in their effort to halt the deployment of missiles to Europe and weaken Mr. Reagan in anticipation of the presidential election of 1984.
According to the KGB memorandum, "Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA."
Treason in the U.S. Senate
Democratic hysterics should retire to a library and read a little history
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - - Sunday, March 15, 2015
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/15/editorial-iran-letter-is-not-treason/
Democratic hysterics should retire to a library and read a little history
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - - Sunday, March 15, 2015
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/15/editorial-iran-letter-is-not-treason/
Ted Kennedy would be proud of the sewer rat:
Flexibility achieved: Obama pulls missile defense system from eastern Europe
posted at 10:01 am on March 20, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/20/flexibility-achieved-obama-pulls-missile-defense-system-from-eastern-europe/
posted at 10:01 am on March 20, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/20/flexibility-achieved-obama-pulls-missile-defense-system-from-eastern-europe/
I never thought I would live long enough to see American traitors sweating.
According to a report by Breitbart’s Elizabeth Sheld, eight Democrat lawmakers have proposed a bill that would eliminate the death penalty as a consequence for individuals convicted of numerous federal crimes, among them espionage and treason. Nothing happens in Washington without a reason, so The Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act (HR 3741) gives rise to a bevy of questions and suspicions.
What motivation would congressional Democrats have for wishing to neutralize the death penalty option for such serious crimes?
What motivation would congressional Democrats have for wishing to neutralize the death penalty option for such serious crimes?
The answer to the question is obvious: THE UNITED NATIONS. To be more precise Democrats fear that their protection is running out of gas.
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
NOTE: The Chicago sewer rat handing the Iran Deal to the United Nations Security Council gave him full protection under the Organizations Immunities Act.
UN-loving traitors now have to be thinking there is a good chance that treason committed for the United Nations can be prosecuted because of:
Article II, Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
This next question was an easy one:
So, who do these lawmakers suppose might be tried for treason, espionage, or the host of other federal crimes now punishable by death in the not-so-distant future?
Do Democrat lawmakers anticipate treason trials?
By Erik Rush Saturday, December 21, 2013
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/60018
By Erik Rush Saturday, December 21, 2013
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/60018
Answer: Every American official that puts the United Nations ahead of their own country.
NOTE: John Kerry was not a government official when he committed treason for North Vietnamese Communists, but maybe there is a chance to nail him for his activities on behalf of the United Nations after he became a government official. What the hell, it really doesn’t matter what he gets hanged for if he is guilty.
Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason. Ovid (47 B.C. - A.D. -17)
Treason never prospered more than it does in the United Nations. Ovid never imagined anything like the United Nations coming; so allow me to bring his observation up to date with a suggestion.
Wouldn’t it be sweet if larceny itself became a hanging offense when it is connected to treason; i.e. government officials taking money from foreign governments. And my heart is pounding at the prospect of hanging all of those damn charity hustlers who send tax dollars to United Nations agencies. It’s just a crying shame those foreign UN charity hustlers living on American tax dollars can’t be hanged right alongside America’s traitors.
Incidentally, did you ever wonder why the UN’s phoney judicial system does not have a death penalty? I always wondered what the punishment is for UN officials who betray the UN? I don’t think there is one. Betraying an organization is much different than is betraying one’s country. The day might come when the UN becomes a global government; so I’d like to see how they handle treason.
Presidents, popes, & treason
Presidents can and should be hanged for treason. As far as I know, the Roman Catholic Church does not hang popes for their little indiscretions. Maybe that’s why Taqiyya sold himself as a spiritual leader. After all, how can you hang a guy for his morality. That’s why Americans better stop thinking about their presidents the same way Roman Catholics think about their popes —— loved by one and all.
In fact, a vast majority of the people in the world do not give a flying f--- for popes or presidents. Yet somehow unctuous religious fanatics are certain that their leader being universally loved will have everyone else rushing to convert to whatever ideology they promote.
And have you noticed that only living Roman Catholic popes, and living American presidents, run the universal love con. You can stretch it a bit and include Boo’s guy, the Dalai Lama, but you sure as hell don’t see Communists, or Muslims, putting up one of their guys for universal adoration. Hell, I don’t think they have a candidate! At least not a living one. Generally speaking their guys are dead; Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mohammad.
Parenthetically, conquerors never expected to be loved. They settled for executing anyone who criticized them. Coerced love worked pretty well because there were not too many people running around calling Genghis Kahn or Julius Caesar douche bags. Adolf Hitler was a 20th century conqueror who might have combined loving him voluntarily with the chopping block. Of course, everything except the chopping block would have fallen apart after he died.
And when was it decided that the American president had to be a spiritual leader rather than simply being a straightforward political leader? And who made that decision? Speaking for myself, when I feel the need to kiss a ring I’ll go see a local Bible-thumper, or hop on a plane to Rome.
Now don’t get me wrong here, a president being a decent man with a spiritual nature isn’t a bad thing even if he engages in a bit of preaching from the bully pulpit whenever the mood moves him; so long as he doesn’t dip into the public purse to payoff pious Socialist frauds. That’s exactly what is happening with HillaryCare II. Our Chicago sewer rat cum universal-spiritual-leader is going to throw as much money at his pals as he can before the ACA is repealed.
