New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Doomsdays that didn’t happen: Think tank compiles decades’ worth of dire climate predictions

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently suggested Miami would disappear in "a few years" due to climate change.

An Associated Press headline from 1989 read "Rising seas could obliterate nations: U.N. officials." The article detailed a U.N. environmental official warning that entire nations would be eliminated if the world failed to reverse warming by 2000.

Then there were the fears that the world would experience a never-ending "cooling trend in the Northern Hemisphere." That claim came from an "international team of specialists" cited by The New York Times in 1978.

Just years prior, Time magazine echoed other media outlets in suggesting that "another ice age" was imminent. "Telltale signs are everywhere — from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest," the magazine warned in 1974.

The Guardian similarly warned in 1974 that "Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast."

In 1970, The Boston Globe ran the headline, "Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century."

The Washington Post, for its part, published a Columbia University scientist's claim that the world could be "as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age."

Some of the more dire predictions came from Paul Ehrlich, a biologist who famously urged population control to mitigate the impacts of humans on the environment. Ehrlich, in 1969, warned that "everybody" would "disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years," The New York Times reported.

In 2008, ABC released an ominous video about what the world would look like in 2015. As the video warned about rising sea levels, a graphic showed significant portions of New York City engulfed by water.

Al Gore himself famously predicted in the early 2000s that Arctic ice could be gone within seven years.


________________________________________________________

ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
It's amazing, really. It's like liberals literally search for things to be afraid of. I simply rely on a few bits of common sense information to conclude they're full of crap.

1) Climate change pimps continue to burn jet fuel, yacht fuel and buy coastal real estate. Obviously they're not worried about climate change. Why should I be?

2) Climate change pimps have repeatedly been caught manipulating data.

3) We have had several temperature spikes in the past million years alone, with at least three being more drastic than the current one.

4) The hockey stick graph edited out the Medieval warming period for visual effect.

5) Sea levels have been rising for at least 7,000 years, based on finding a 7,000 year-old burial site under 20 feet of Atlantic ocean.

One would have to be a complete fool to buy into the climate change hysteria of liberals. It's all about attacking capitalism and more specifically, American capitalism.
 

EatTheRich

President
It's amazing, really. It's like liberals literally search for things to be afraid of. I simply rely on a few bits of common sense information to conclude they're full of crap.

1) Climate change pimps continue to burn jet fuel, yacht fuel and buy coastal real estate. Obviously they're not worried about climate change. Why should I be?

2) Climate change pimps have repeatedly been caught manipulating data.

3) We have had several temperature spikes in the past million years alone, with at least three being more drastic than the current one.

4) The hockey stick graph edited out the Medieval warming period for visual effect.

5) Sea levels have been rising for at least 7,000 years, based on finding a 7,000 year-old burial site under 20 feet of Atlantic ocean.

One would have to be a complete fool to buy into the climate change hysteria of liberals. It's all about attacking capitalism and more specifically, American capitalism.
1. Ad hominem. You should be worried about climate change because of the evidence, not dismiss it because some people don’t show sufficient concern.
2. You mean folks like Anthony Watts and Michael Gove? A good reason to stop listening to them.
3. No, we have ‘t.
4. No, it wasn’t. It is barely perceptible because the warming was orders of magnitude smaller than the present warming.
5. And they are rising twice as fast today ... meanwhile the temperature rise is just beginning.
 

EatTheRich

President
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently suggested Miami would disappear in "a few years" due to climate change.

An Associated Press headline from 1989 read "Rising seas could obliterate nations: U.N. officials." The article detailed a U.N. environmental official warning that entire nations would be eliminated if the world failed to reverse warming by 2000.

Then there were the fears that the world would experience a never-ending "cooling trend in the Northern Hemisphere." That claim came from an "international team of specialists" cited by The New York Times in 1978.

Just years prior, Time magazine echoed other media outlets in suggesting that "another ice age" was imminent. "Telltale signs are everywhere — from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest," the magazine warned in 1974.

The Guardian similarly warned in 1974 that "Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast."

In 1970, The Boston Globe ran the headline, "Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century."

The Washington Post, for its part, published a Columbia University scientist's claim that the world could be "as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age."

Some of the more dire predictions came from Paul Ehrlich, a biologist who famously urged population control to mitigate the impacts of humans on the environment. Ehrlich, in 1969, warned that "everybody" would "disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years," The New York Times reported.

In 2008, ABC released an ominous video about what the world would look like in 2015. As the video warned about rising sea levels, a graphic showed significant portions of New York City engulfed by water.

Al Gore himself famously predicted in the early 2000s that Arctic ice could be gone within seven years.


________________________________________________________

ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Significant portions of NYC have been engulfed by water. Rising seas will obliterate nations and make Miami uninhabitable. Ehrlich’s crank views, and the discredited theory of a minority who in the 1970s thought anthropogenic cooling effects would overwhelm anthropogenic warming effects, have nothing to do with the present robust consensus on climate change.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
1. Ad hominem. You should be worried about climate change because of the evidence, not dismiss it because some people don’t show sufficient concern.
2. You mean folks like Anthony Watts and Michael Gove? A good reason to stop listening to them.
3. No, we have ‘t.
4. No, it wasn’t. It is barely perceptible because the warming was orders of magnitude smaller than the present warming.
5. And they are rising twice as fast today ... meanwhile the temperature rise is just beginning.
1-5: all lies. You're especially dishonest when it comes to climate change because you know climate change is about implementing communism. You should at least admit that.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Significant portions of NYC have been engulfed by water. Rising seas will obliterate nations and make Miami uninhabitable. Ehrlich’s crank views, and the discredited theory of a minority who in the 1970s thought anthropogenic cooling effects would overwhelm anthropogenic warming effects, have nothing to do with the present robust consensus on climate change.
Everything you just babbled about has happened many times before all over the planet due to the climate changing. For example, Death Valley is full of sea life fossils.
 

EatTheRich

President
Everything you just babbled about has happened many times before all over the planet due to the climate changing. For example, Death Valley is full of sea life fossils.
Yes, and now it is changing more rapidly than it has for tens of millions of years, as predicted in advance due to obvious causes.
 

EatTheRich

President
1-5: all lies. You're especially dishonest when it comes to climate change because you know climate change is about implementing communism. You should at least admit that.
No, climate change is about climate change. The fact that communism is in reality the only thing that can save civilization does not alter reality.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Yes, and now it is changing more rapidly than it has for tens of millions of years, as predicted in advance due to obvious causes.
Even if that were true, tens of millions of years isnt' much on Earth's timeline. Let's say it's 20 million years. That's 2% of a billion years. Earth is 4.5 billion years old. 2/4.5 = 0.4444% of Earth's timeline.
 

EatTheRich

President
Even if that were true, tens of millions of years isnt' much on Earth's timeline. Let's say it's 20 million years. That's 2% of a billion years. Earth is 4.5 billion years old. 2/4.5 = 0.4444% of Earth's timeline.
Scale it down to a human lifetime. Suppose you were violently ill for the first time in four months. Suppose that happened after you ate nuts even though your doctor told you you would get sick if you ate nuts. Would it be reasonable to keep eating nuts because, after all, four months isn’t that much on the scale of a human lifetime?
 

Nostra

Governor
Scale it down to a human lifetime. Suppose you were violently ill for the first time in four months. Suppose that happened after you ate nuts even though your doctor told you you would get sick if you ate nuts. Would it be reasonable to keep eating nuts because, after all, four months isn’t that much on the scale of a human lifetime?
That is hilarious. Do you really think that analogy works?:D:D:D
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Scale it down to a human lifetime. Suppose you were violently ill for the first time in four months. Suppose that happened after you ate nuts even though your doctor told you you would get sick if you ate nuts. Would it be reasonable to keep eating nuts because, after all, four months isn’t that much on the scale of a human lifetime?
Thanks I'll stick with reality.
 

EatTheRich

President
That is hilarious. Do you really think that analogy works?:D:D:D
Maybe you missed the point of it. I forgot to add, the last time you got sick it had nothing to do with eating nuts ... you had malaria instead. You concluded that getting sick was just a thing that happens with no possible way to avoid it, and that it was stupid to listen to the doctor (the equivalent of the world’s scientists in this metaphor).
 

Nostra

Governor
Maybe you missed the point of it. I forgot to add, the last time you got sick it had nothing to do with eating nuts ... you had malaria instead. You concluded that getting sick was just a thing that happens with no possible way to avoid it, and that it was stupid to listen to the doctor (the equivalent of the world’s scientists in this metaphor).
That is hilarious. Do you really think that analogy works?:D:D:D
 

EatTheRich

President
That is hilarious. Do you really think that analogy works?:D:D:D
Sure. It has a lot of points of similarity to the current situation. Perhaps you need help understanding it.

Eating nuts=fossil fuel combustion
Doctor=the world’s scientists
Individual ignoring doctor=society ignoring
scientists
Getting sick=catastrophic climate change that threatens civilization
Doctor’s warning=scientists’ forecasts
Malaria=cause of last catastrophic climate
change that was not the fossil fuel
combustion that is the cause of the
catastrophic climate change forecast and
then observed in the present instance
 
Top