Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
True, but you'd need about a million of them to do it.Dude a thermometer would measure ocean temps quickly, easily and accurately
True, but you'd need about a million of them to do it.Dude a thermometer would measure ocean temps quickly, easily and accurately
Again when water absorbs heat, there is a temperature flux, which can easily be measured by observing the water temperature.You did it again. You made the same exact mistake. Conflating two totally dissimilar measurements.
See if you can figure out where you went wrong.
You honestly don't get your mistake do you?Again when water absorbs heat, there is a temperature flux, which can easily be measured by observing the water temperature.
Heat flux, or heat transfer per rate unit area, is a useful quantity in applications such as determining the transfer of energy from a fuel plate to working fluid, such as in a pressurized water reactor.
Measure the system parameters. Include uniform thickness of the material through which heat is flowing, and call it wall thickness, d. Include thermal conductivity, k, of this material. Measure (or estimate from system design parameters) the hot temperature (such as that of a heat source), Thot. Measure cold temperature (such as that of a working fluid), Tcold.
Calculate heat transfer rate, Q. Q is measured in units of energy per unit time, such as BTU/hr or Watts. For a wall of uniform thickness d, with a thermal conductivity of k, an area of A, a hot temperature, Thot, and cold temperature, Tcold, solve Q with the following equation: Q = k*A(Thot - Tcold)/d. For example, using iron with a k = 79.5 (Watts/m K), a wall 1 cm thick, analyzed over 1 square meter, and Thot - Tcold = 111C (or degrees K, equivalently), Q = 882,450 Watts
Is playtime over yet?
So they actually have you brainwashed into believing that you can brainwash me.You honestly don't get your mistake do you?
It is really obvious. I spelled it out for you in my first post to you on this subject.
Try again
Lol.So they actually have you brainwashed into believing that you can brainwash me.
I popped a pimple this morning that had a higher IQ than you.
PS The only thing that you spelled out in this thread is your ignorance of thermodynamics.
Practical application
Amount of observable data in the above ramble...……………….Lol.
Angry name calling?
I see you really missed my point and continue to. It'll probably come to you in the middle of the night. Don't choke on your foot.
It will probably come to you. You'll be embarrassed. It's ok. It happens.Amount of observable data in the above ramble...……………….
ZERO-------->
You want to test me, Good
You didn't know then, you don't know now. If you did you could very easily embarrass me now. You would clearly like to do that, except forIt will probably come to you. You'll be embarrassed. It's ok. It happens.
I already did. You just haven't realized it yet. You probably will soon. Or maybe not.You didn't know then, you don't know now. If you did you could very easily embarrass me now. You would clearly like to do that, except for
130
Uh huh, where exactly is Al Bore hiding after babbling that CO2 levels will make snow a thing of the past by the year 2013...……………….I already did. You just haven't realized it yet. You probably will soon. Or maybe not.
Do it again, all you need do is copy and paste anyway, please...………………Or is that too hard for you.I already did. You just haven't realized it yet. You probably will soon. Or maybe not.
My “cult” (that is, science) is about rationally maximizing expectation in order to minimize needless death and suffering.Oh. So food disappearing isn't about climate, it is about money.
Thanks for once again confirming your Cult is all about money, not climate.
Oops!
There is no individual solution to the collective social problem of mass poverty that is a built-in feature of the capitalist system.a better solution for the poor rather than to seek to vote themselves other peoples money is to better themselves don't you agree?
The theory is a fundamental part of physics.Oh yeah, it's way different than that. It's based on a theory, not physics.
Nope. Your Cult is all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$My “cult” (that is, science) is about rationally maximizing expectation in order to minimize needless death and suffering.
No, I think all wealth should belong to the producers.Nope. Your Cult is all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$
Take from the producers, give to the leeches.
What has your Cult produced? I mean, besides cooked books, manipulated data, and colossally incorrect predictions?No, I think all wealth should belong to the producers.
You must have me confused with a climate change denier. I agree with the position that is the consensus among experts because it is supported by successful predictions and accurate data.What has your Cult produced? I mean, besides cooked books, manipulated data, and colossally incorrect predictions?
So, you can't name anything your Cult has produced except mind-numbed lemmings who believe their lies.You must have me confused with a climate change denier. I agree with the position that is the consensus among experts because it is supported by successful predictions and accurate data.
I don’t belong to a cult. I am a rational, evidence-based person. Just so you know, thinking for yourself does not mean blindly and without reason contradicting the experts. That’s something cultists do.So, you can't name anything your Cult has produced except mind-numbed lemmings who believe their lies.
Got it.