Earth just experienced one of the warmest years on record
- Thread starter PNWest
- Start date
EatTheRich
President
Not Ocasio-Cortez, but the most cited climatologists, physicists, and mathematicians in the world, say we have about 12 years to stop increasing and start cutting carbon emissions to avoid the much more serious consequences that will come with more than 1.5 degrees warming (ranging from poison gas clouds in the atmosphere to obligate nomadism).You wouldn't know science if it hit you in the head.
You are a comical little child screaming that the Earth will end in 12 years because a schizzo democrat said so.
I got news for you retard, if the Earth is going to end in 12 years I do believe that it's time to start building space ships, or we all die. Her plan is what?
It's all straws fault...
Last edited:
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
When is the period of time in Earth History when no temperature changes were made? Again your hero said that in 12 years the World will end, proof that she is a schitzu just like you
EatTheRich
President
What’s important is not the presence or absence of change so much as the rate of change and the situation after changes have been occurring.
Many people think that humans being forced to adopt a nomadic lifestyle would be the end of the world.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Kid the presence of change is directly tied to the rate, they can not be untied. Furthermore prior to 150 years ago the exactly measured rate of change is a nonexistent variable, so there can be no equation except a theoretical one where the variables need be inserted by those seeking a grant, or a brain dead parrot type like you.
This is why no human can even begin to demonstrate AGW. There is no evidence, none, however the faithful to the cult do not need evidence, just their faith in order to believe. You belong to a doomsday cult
The asteroid is coming, better jump on
EatTheRich
President
No, the rate of change before the instrumental record was not directly measured. But it can be inferred based on the effects on the climate, on wildlife, and on the Earth, and no scientist has ever been able to produce a reconstruction of past temperatures that does not have the “hockey stick” shape which shows present-day warming to be off the charts ... although industry-backed scientists have certainly tried very hard.Kid the presence of change is directly tied to the rate, they can not be untied. Furthermore prior to 150 years ago the exactly measured rate of change is a nonexistent variable, so there can be no equation except a theoretical one where the variables need be inserted by those seeking a grant, or a brain dead parrot type like you.
This is why no human can even begin to demonstrate AGW. There is no evidence, none, however the faithful to the cult do not need evidence, just their faith in order to believe. You belong to a doomsday cult
The asteroid is coming, better jump on
Is it your position that there is in principle no evidence that could possibly support the theory of anthropogenic global warming?
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Wrong kid, the hockey stick graph only accounts for 1000 years of temps. The ice age ebbed 20000 years ago, and that was recent in Earth history. The hockey stick graph of 1000 years is irrelevant when set at the end of 5 BILLION YEARS OF TIME
That graph is no longer even mentioned, at least not since Penn State became the capitol of child abuse
EatTheRich
President
There is not one hockey stick graph but dozens. And, yes, they account for about 1000 years of temperatures during which there was an evident equilibrium, and a couple decades of sharp divergence.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
It does not matter if their are a million hockey stick graphs. The point is that none of them detail the MASSIVE TEMPERATURE SPIKE THAT MELTED THE ICE AGE AWAY, 20000 years before the industrial revolution.
Silly girl
Last edited:
EatTheRich
President
When the last glacial period ended, the atmosphere warmed 6 degrees over a period of 8,000 years. More recently, it has warmed 1 degree over a period of 40 years.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
The records that you quote do not exist, and there is no consensus that they do. However cult members are not swayed
Last edited:
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
There are no temps on the NASA graph retard, it's CO2
Are you really this stupid or is this an official test of the emergency imbecile system.
Seriously, who does your little mind envision gives a hooty when you disagree? Do you think I need the approval of an imbecile?
EatTheRich
President
There are several charts on the link as well as references to papers that show the evidence in more detail.
You don’t just disagree with me ... you disagree (without any real evidence, only your little straw men that don’t mean what you think they do) with every major scientific body in the world.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
EatTheRich
President
Curry accepts the consensus view that anthropogenic climate change is real. She just has outside-the-mainstream positions on how sensitive the climate is to greenhouse forcings. And her models were much poorer at predicting the actual climate change of recent decades than models with average values (which also underestimated the amount of warming but not as badly).
Do you agree with her that human carbon emissions cause warming?
Is there a particular reason you agree with her even though she has been less successful than other scientists at forecasting recent warming ... other than that she affirms your prejudices?
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming
https://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warming
PRINCETON, NJ (January 3, 2011)—S. Fred Singer said in an interview with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) that “the number of skeptical qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is about 40% now.”
Singer, a leading scientific skeptic of anthropocentric global warming (AGW), is an atmospheric physicist, and founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), an organization that began challenging the published findings of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the 1990s. SEPP established the Leipzig Declaration, a statement of dissent from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol that has been signed by over one hundred scientists and meteorologists.
Asked what he would like to see happen in regard to public opinion and policy on climate change, Singer replied,
I would like to see the public look upon global warming as just another scientific controversy and oppose any public policies until the major issues are settled, such as the cause. If mostly natural, as NIPCC concludes, then the public policies currently discussed are pointless, hugely expensive, and wasteful of resources that could better be applied to real societal problems.
NIPCC is the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, another group established by Singer. In 2009 NIPCC published Climate Change Reconsidered,an 880-page report on scientific research that contradicts the models of man-made global warming. Singer believes that global warming exists but that human contributions to it are minimal. In the interview Singer said he believed his efforts in the last twenty years had been successful in disproving the notion that “the science is settled.”
Singer continues his work in the sciences, focusing lately on geophysical research and the Earth’s atmosphere. He is professor emeritus of environmental science at the University of Virginia, and he was the founding Dean of the School of Environmental and Planetary Sciences at the University of Miami (1964-1967) and the Director of the Center for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Maryland (1953-1962).
The National Association of Scholars does not take a position on global warming but advocates for a full discussion of all sides of the controversy.To learn more about NAS, visit www.nas.org.
EatTheRich
President
Singer ... an infamous shill ... made that number up.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Dude, the climate is changing, has been for 5 billion years. Pull your hair out and scream, get 100 percent of scientist to do the same. The Sun will still shine and the Earth will spin and orbit. There is nothing that you can do about the temperature of the Earth. Not even with all your retarded friends, and you sure have lots of brainwashed morons
Think you can prove me wrong?
Haven't enough tried and failed already?
EatTheRich
President
The IPCC ... summarizing the published research in the most-cited scientific journals ... say it is “extremely likely” that humans activity is “the primary cause” of the current warming, “a virtual certainty” that this warming will continue, and “extremely likely” that failing to cut carbon emissions will result in more intense warming over a shorter time frame.
It is not my responsibility to prove your evidence-free assertions wrong. It is your responsibility to prove every scientific body in the world wrong.
