AnaKasparianForPOTUS
Council Member
Trump gives the SOTU and says nothing about global warming...disgrace.
Earth just experienced one of the warmest years on record
- Thread starter PNWest
- Start date
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
And Nancy Peelosy snubbed Cortezzy for a spot on the climate commitee.
PS The globe has been warming for 20000 years
Nostra
Governor
The SOTU isn't a Sitcom.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
About 93 percent of global warming goes into heating the oceans, compared to about 2 percent warming the atmosphere.
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/02/earths-oceans-are-routinely-breaking-heat-records/
If scientists can more accurately measure the speed at which oceans are warming, they can better predict the future effects of climate change.
A study published Wednesday in the journal Nature, led by Laure Resplandy, a biogeochemical oceanographer at Princeton University, used a new approach that derived ocean temperatures by measuring the levels of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the atmosphere.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/31/climate/ocean-temperatures-hotter.html
You do know what "derived" means, right? You can't get an accurate oceanic mean temperature without a whole lot of interpolation. And, in fact, in the case cited above, it is simply "derived" by measuring gas levels in…wait for it…the ATMOSPHERE. So, in fact, they don't even sample ocean temperatures in order to "measure" ocean temperatures...
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/02/earths-oceans-are-routinely-breaking-heat-records/
If scientists can more accurately measure the speed at which oceans are warming, they can better predict the future effects of climate change.
A study published Wednesday in the journal Nature, led by Laure Resplandy, a biogeochemical oceanographer at Princeton University, used a new approach that derived ocean temperatures by measuring the levels of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the atmosphere.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/31/climate/ocean-temperatures-hotter.html
You do know what "derived" means, right? You can't get an accurate oceanic mean temperature without a whole lot of interpolation. And, in fact, in the case cited above, it is simply "derived" by measuring gas levels in…wait for it…the ATMOSPHERE. So, in fact, they don't even sample ocean temperatures in order to "measure" ocean temperatures...
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
I didn't realize we lived in a dictatorship. Of course, we do not. And your post here is mere propaganda. In fact, the economy does best under split governance:
https://www.ajc.com/news/opinion/will-divided-government-good-for-the-economy/8WPiFPMjHyIRSIX8rjwLqK/
And, of course, both of these "facts" owe their existence almost entirely to the Clinton years. Back those years out and it's pretty much a toss up...
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Dude a thermometer would measure ocean temps quickly, easily and accurately
It would measure the temp in one spot. The trick is to measure how much heat is being absorbed in the ocean broadly, which of course is tens of thousands of miles in area and thousands of feet deep. And the temperature is not uniformly distributed.
Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Now that we are having longer growing seasons we can eat better and healthier.
EatTheRich
President
Not that different from “deriving” the temperature from its effect on the mercury in a thermometer.
EatTheRich
President
We are nearing the point at which the total amount of food produced peaks and then begins to rapidly decline.
Now that we are having longer growing seasons we can eat better and healthier.
Nostra
Governor
What year will we have no food, Owlgore Jr.?
EatTheRich
President
Depends how much money “we” have ... that’s why global warming denial is the ideology of the rich and global warming realism a necessity for the poor.
Nostra
Governor
Oh. So food disappearing isn't about climate, it is about money.
Thanks for once again confirming your Cult is all about money, not climate.
Oops!
redtide
Mayor
I am confused, why should he mention the climate cult? do their worshipers feel slighted?
redtide
Mayor
a better solution for the poor rather than to seek to vote themselves other peoples money is to better themselves don't you agree?
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
The temps thousands of feet deep can be easily measured, and by the way they are very stable.
Only an idiot would think that measuring the temps of water was difficult.
You qualify
As an idiot
No one thinks measuring the temperature of water is difficult.
Scientists know that measuring the change in heat absorbed and stored in the Earth's oceans is extremely difficult.
Only an idiot would conflate that with "measuring the temperature of water".
Seriously guy, that was pathetic.
Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
Actually kiddy, scientist know that measuring the change in heat absorbed by the water is really easy to determine by simply measuring the temperature of the water, before and after exposure to a temperature flux. You are saying the same thing in different ways and having different outcomes, it's amazingly stupid.
Is this a test or are you severely retarded. That said a severely retarded person would not likely be posting here, so this must be a test of the emergency idiot system
130
Last edited:
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Oh yeah, it's way different than that. It's based on a theory, not physics.
You did it again. You made the same exact mistake. Conflating two totally dissimilar measurements.
See if you can figure out where you went wrong.
