New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

"Europe is for Europeans"

The words of your posts contradict all four of your defensive assertions.
This is evident in numerous posts. In this thread, you singled out White Christians for derision. Advocating preferential treatment for non-Whites and advocating an end to White cultures -- as you've done -- is racism. Advocating the end of Christianity and all theistic religion and their replacement by the atheistic religion of Communism -- as you've done -- is advocating the triumph of one religion over others.


It's makes one sad to realize that there are people who can actually say such things with a straight face; sadder still that there are people who know it's false and ridiculous yet promote the idea anyway with a devious grin.
The girls are beginning to speak out. She is nervous and doesn't put her story across well but --- brave brave girl

 
I know I keep on about this case but it is important - it is such a travesty of justice - no matter what you think of Tommy this case is frightening.

 

Pogue Mahone

Legalize it.
So he's been given 9 months, eligible for release after serving half. Does he get out of prison alive? He says he has his doubts. I think he will though. He'll be harassed, he'll probably be beaten up, maybe raped(or is that only US prisons where that happens?), and he won't be able to eat any prison food, but he'll come out alive. Alive but humiliated, put in his proper place for all British subjects to see what happens when you defy the Crown.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/791215/tommy-robinson-at-old-bailey-with-katie-hopkins-sentencing-latest-update-court-case-trial
 
So he's been given 9 months, eligible for release after serving half. Does he get out of prison alive? He says he has his doubts. I think he will though. He'll be harassed, he'll probably be beaten up, maybe raped(or is that only US prisons where that happens?), and he won't be able to eat any prison food, but he'll come out alive. Alive but humiliated, put in his proper place for all British subjects to see what happens when you defy the Crown.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/791215/tommy-robinson-at-old-bailey-with-katie-hopkins-sentencing-latest-update-court-case-trial
Half? Probably not since he pleaded not guilty. If you plead guilty you do a 1/3 if you plead not guilty and are found guilty you do the whole stretch but he has already done 2 and 1/2 mths so he'll be out at Christmas - in the normal way of these things. No - you are right - he'll do half = out in October. He will miss his children's summer hols :(

It depends where he is sent - some prisons are ok and still run by prison authorities. In them he would be relatively safe but most London prisons are run by Islamic gangs. He can say he fears for his life and wants protection but he won't because he would then be put on the nonces wing ( vulnerable prisoners wing who are mainly sex offenders or mad people) - it really depends on where he goes, if an Islamic run one, at first he will have to keep his wits but then they will put him in solitary but it is always the change over times - or going for visits etc - where the danger lies, one shank and he is gone, and they will poison his food so he'll be starved, as last time.

But if they have him suicided I predict a lot of dead Pakistani peados in the wake --- T May is nearly gone, Soon there will be a new PM and Home Sec and MP for Prisons - none of the new ones will want his death and the wrath of the people again them --- one hopes! But the evil May is still in No 10 as is her AG still in place - and who knows what the next batch will bring?

Nothing to do with the Crown, you will find almost all Tommy supporters are Monarchists too.

He will appeal but that won't be heard until he is out, in the normal course of these things - but we shall make a fuss never the less.

I'll update you when we know where he is.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
What crime EatTheRich? What crime?

He has committed no crime - no crime at all unless you are saying the the whole media, at any given court case, asking any defendant as they go into court to hear their verdict 'what do you feel about your verdict' is criminal --- well? Is that a crime? Only one member of our Media, a journalist from the Beeb, said that they felt very uncomfortable about the verdict because it was something she had done, herself, many many times. The rest are crowing at this Stalinesque Show Trial and NOT telling the truth - even in details such as the victims being underage girls, as young as 11 - the BBC was calling them 'the women' and reporting in such a way as to make the peado rapists the poor victims of Tommy Robinson - they are also reporting that Tommy said 'nasty things' to the defendants as they entered court, which is totally untrue --- the opposite is true. I was watching the live stream that morning, dunno why I was doing a law assignment and flicking on line - and I watched it from beginning to end - He asked the Police if he was OK to film and where he could stand - they said 'you're ok' - and he only asked the defendants 'how do you feel about the verdicts' - to which they answered 'I'll fu'ck your mother's fanny' and ' your wife is a whore' and such like.

If Tommy was guilty of that which they have have tried him for three times now it would be a civil offence anyway not criminal.

14 cases were being heard in the Old Bailey that day 13 murders and Tommy's - WTF does that tell you? What is a poxy little contempt case doing being tired in the highest criminal court of the Land? And for the third time on the same offence? Trial one was found unsafe, legally - even though he spent nearly 3 months in solitary as a criminal, where the offence was civil. Trial 2 the judge was uncomfortable with it and referred the case back to the AG and now we have trial three ----

Guilty count 1) Of causing anxiety to a defendant, as they entered court, by asking ''hey lads, how do you feel about the verdict, Count 2) ditto over the taking of a photo = causing anxiety to defendant so that they may fear coming to court and so more police may be necessary in order for said defendant not to be fearful of coming to court [ that day he, defendant, went straight to jail for his hand in the serial rape and torture of 16 underage girls]
Count 3 - that he read out the names and charges against all 29 defendants which the defence argued was already in the public domain ( BBC and various News papers) for which no one may, under the law, be prosecuted -- 'No', said the judge 'that is wrong' Huh? The law is wrong?! She said she will explain it fully next week - day of sentencing is the 11th, this coming Thursday, giving Tommy six days instead of the usual six weeks to prepare his appeal without a full explanation for the verdict.

Both of the first two cases denied Tommy risked the trial collapsing --- so forget that bull shit! Even Judge Marson said that Tommy did not endanger the trial. The whole thing hinges on whether there was a reporting restriction in place or not, outside the one on publishing verdicts until the three phase trial was over, which is irrelevant here because no-one argues that it was broken, it wasn't: The Officer of Leeds Crown Court told the Old Bailey Court that due to a failure on the part of her office there was NO notice of a reporting restriction given to the media or up on and court notice boards ( it should have been up in three places in court) - the judge said that Tommy should have assumed, should have known, that there might have been a reporting restriction on the case and was therefore guilty of substantive recklessness --- Until recently no-one has been imprisoned for contempt of court for 60 yrs. Very recently a woman was given a 12 week custodial sentence, half to be sat inside and half on licence so 6 weeks for 26 counts of wilful contempt of court ( a human rights thing which we can't talk about because of all of these fu'cking secret trials we have here now).

In every court room in our country now, all over the country these Muslim rape gang trials are going on and on all of them there is now a reporting restriction and even before there was the press never reported the details of the cases, just occasionally they reported the defendants names and charges before the case - then silence during the trials - then the sentences only at the end of the trials - so few of us know the details which are horrific - children hanging in freezers used to terrorize other children ( if you don't do as we say and keep your mouth shut, you are next) - the tortures - the multiple rapes, how the fu'ck does an 11 year old even take 50 men a night? - the kidnaps and murders and most perps still walking around and called 'the untouchables' by the community - they stride around as though they own the country - which in parts they do and they will tell you 'get out of our country, this is our country now'.

This is real EatTheRich - IF they send Tommy to prison again we do not expect to see him alive again.

As a ps on Tommy's asking for asylum 1) his family will be without protection and there have been multiple and real threats to their lives - at one point Tommy was put in the same room in one prison with the men doing 20 yrs for trying to murder his family - but I think the plea is mainly to bring attention to the reality that we now, here, live in a totalitarian state.
He was ordered to do one thing by the judge: stop broadcasting lies and propaganda aimed at encouraging vigilante violence against defendants who at the time had not been convicted of anything.
 

EatTheRich

President
Of course they were - how do the working classes move back into an area which has been bought up by another community who does not want integration? You don't have to look far to see that the Pakistanis are buying up whole swathes of our towns and cities - they inter marry to keep property and money within families.

I have never said that immigrants are of and in themselves guilty of destroying the fabric of the old working class communities. I do not blame anyone for trying to better their lot - I have just told you what happened and it isn't just white communities - West Indians and Jews are also targeted.
Evidence they didn’t want integration? When a house goes on the market aren’t they required to follow nondiscrimination laws?
 

EatTheRich

President
The words of your posts contradict all four of your defensive assertions.
This is evident in numerous posts. In this thread, you singled out White Christians for derision. Advocating preferential treatment for non-Whites and advocating an end to White cultures -- as you've done -- is racism. Advocating the end of Christianity and all theistic religion and their replacement by the atheistic religion of Communism -- as you've done -- is advocating the triumph of one religion over others.


It's makes one sad to realize that there are people who can actually say such things with a straight face; sadder still that there are people who know it's false and ridiculous yet promote the idea anyway with a devious grin.
1. Communism is not a religion.
2. You are so used to preferential treatment for whites that you see any advocacy of equal treatment as advocacy of “preferential treatment for non-whites.”
3. I have not called for “an end to white culture” but for a cultural synthesis that puts progress ahead of racial exclusivist.
 

EatTheRich

President
You can't impoverish someone who has nothing to begin with, EatYourDung. Fact is the United States and other western nations have given these places an unbelievable amount of aid. Nevertheless, they remain shitholes.
Kilwa and Mombasa were among the wealthiest cities in the world before Europeans who had only a very slight technological advantage bombarded them with the goal of eliminating the competition. Timbuktu, Djenne, Gao ... all fantastically wealthy before Europe’s slave trade disrupted their economies and set off a cycle of war and impoverishment. The aid they have gotten back is an infinitesimal fraction of the wealth that has flowed out of them in the form of tribute, cheap raw materials, and cheap or unpaid labor.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Kilwa and Mombasa were among the wealthiest cities in the world before Europeans who had only a very slight technological advantage bombarded them with the goal of eliminating the competition. Timbuktu, Djenne, Gao ... all fantastically wealthy before Europe’s slave trade disrupted their economies and set off a cycle of war and impoverishment. The aid they have gotten back is an infinitesimal fraction of the wealth that has flowed out of them in the form of tribute, cheap raw materials, and cheap or unpaid labor.
So all these countries that have never been ruled by western culture and have always been shitholes are now shitholes because of some war in the 12th century? ROFL. Thank God the Japanese overcame their decimation after World War 2. Thank God the United States go rise to the greatest nation on Earth from literally NOTHING 250 years ago.

The fact is these countries mooch billions of dollars of aid from the west....particularly the United States every year. They've been doing it for decades. They have no standard of living. I'll told you to go live there. You're too chickenshit to do it and instead mooch off the American taxpayer. EatYourOwnDung is an appropriate name.
 
Top