If they’re lies, then all the measurements that they are based on ... which are used for all kinds of things (GPS, satellites, farm and economic planning with hundreds of billions at stake) ... are all fabricated.Lies.
Nope. More lies.If they’re lies, then all the measurements that they are based on ... which are used for all kinds of things (GPS, satellites, farm and economic planning with hundreds of billions at stake) ... are all fabricated.
Many of them are.If they’re lies, then all the measurements that they are based on ... which are used for all kinds of things (GPS, satellites, farm and economic planning with hundreds of billions at stake) ... are all fabricated.
So how come my GPS works if it is calibrated based on that favricated data?Many of them are.
Yes, the current temperatures are all fabricated. That's what we've been trying to tell you. Glad you finally wised up.If they’re lies, then all the measurements that they are based on ... which are used for all kinds of things (GPS, satellites, farm and economic planning with hundreds of billions at stake) ... are all fabricated.
It isn't based on weather data at all. Do you not understand latitude and longitude? They have nothing to do with the weather.So how come my GPS works if it is calibrated based on that favricated data?
My GPS has nothing to do with temperatures. It's all about location. Locations do not change based on the temperature.So how come my GPS works if it is calibrated based on that favricated data?
You must be unaware that the evidence for anthropogenic global warming goes WELL beyond raw temperature data (itself analyzed according to its correlation with geographically specified location) but also includes all sorts of biological data (also correlated with location), atmospheric data (also correlated with location), oceanic data (also correlated with location).It isn't based on weather data at all. Do you not understand latitude and longitude? They have nothing to do with the weather.
Hogwash. You are the most shameless liar I have ever encountered on a forum.You must be unaware that the evidence for anthropogenic global warming goes WELL beyond raw temperature data (itself analyzed according to its correlation with geographically specified location) but also includes all sorts of biological data (also correlated with location), atmospheric data (also correlated with location), oceanic data (also correlated with location).
There is no way scientists could have systematically falsified all that data in a way that would support the conclusion the actual data led them to without literally redrawing the lines of latitude and longitude on the globe.
High on Mighty MouseLies.
You do know the lines were developed in the second century?You must be unaware that the evidence for anthropogenic global warming goes WELL beyond raw temperature data (itself analyzed according to its correlation with geographically specified location) but also includes all sorts of biological data (also correlated with location), atmospheric data (also correlated with location), oceanic data (also correlated with location).
There is no way scientists could have systematically falsified all that data in a way that would support the conclusion the actual data led them to without literally redrawing the lines of latitude and longitude on the globe.
GPS always gets me lost on really hot or really cold days.Hogwash. You are the most shameless liar I have ever encountered on a forum.
Latitude and longitude are purely mathematical and arbitrary.
For those who want to know the truth:
https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/history-science-technology-and-medicine/history-science/latitude-and-longitude
Spaced-Out ExtortionMany of them are.
And without literally falsifying the globe they could not have gotten the global warming evidence they needed .., unless of course the warming was real and the evidence wasn’t falsified.You do know the lines were developed in the second century?
Spock's SputumSo how come my GPS works if it is calibrated based on that favricated data?
So, what you claim is that if someone doesn't buy into the MMGW Cult BS they also do not believe the Earth exists?And without literally falsifying the globe they could not have gotten the global warming evidence they needed .., unless of course the warming was real and the evidence wasn’t falsified.
I mean, if you deny basic physics and chemistry you are living in a fantasy alternate reality where nothing behaves according to discoverable laws.So, what you claim is that if someone doesn't buy into the MMGW Cult BS they also do not believe the Earth exists?