Former DHS chief: Yup, the Kremlin interfered with our election

[Bugsy McGurk]

Looks like the only person who doesn't know that the Russians were behind the hackings, etc., is Donald Trump. Shucks, Sean Spicer couldn't even say yesterday if Trump thinks Russia did it.

No direct evidence yet that Russia actually rigged the ballot counts through their hacks into state electoral systems.

If that holds true, the Kremlin "only" indirectly picked our current president.

https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/338702-former-dhs-sec-johnson-dhss-initial-response-to-dnc-hack-was-not?amp

 

[Sickofleft]

You are certainly hoping and praying that is why Trump won....but wishing does not make it so.

 

[marvin martian]

Still no proof, huh? Keep working on it, you'll find something eventually...

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Still no proof, huh? Keep working on it, you'll find something eventually...

No proof?

You deny that Russia interefered in our election through their illegal hackings?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

You are certainly hoping and praying that is why Trump won....but wishing does not make it so.

Is it your view that Russia's hacking of Dem emails systems and their anti-Hillary fake news campaigns had no effect on votes cast?

 

[marvin martian]

No proof?

You deny that Russia interefered in our election through their illegal hackings?

I don't confirm or deny until I see proof one way or the other. A pity your standard is even lower than that. LOL

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

I don't confirm or deny until I see proof one way or the other. A pity your standard is even lower than that. LOL

All our intel agencies say so. You want them to expose their sources and methods because you trust the Kremlin more than our own government?

 

[Sickofleft]

Is it your view that Russia's hacking of Dem emails systems and their anti-Hillary fake news campaigns had no effect on votes cast?

No I don't think the hacking had an effect on votes cast. I think Hillary's campaigns response to the hacking had an effect.

For example, when North Korea hacked SONY pictures because they made a film making fun of the dear leader, you did not hear SONY executives when asked about the information that was released to the public start babbling incoherently about North Korea. They addressed the information, apologized to those that may have been offended.

Clinton's campaign? When asked about the information revealed would start babbling incoherently about the Russians. The most famous one of these instances, Donna Brazille was asked about leaking questions from CNN to the Clinton's during the primaries? Did she state it was a mistake? Did she state that I got carried away in my support for Hillary Clinton and I apologize to the Sanders campaign etc.?..........

Nope, she babbled incoherently about being a persecuted woman.............

People notice these things and they either did not show up or they voted for Trump.
Clinton lost because she was a terrible candidate and ran a campaign that befitted a terrible candidate. Any attempt to say otherwise is just pure unadulterated bullshit designed from a party that can't deal with losing.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

No proof?

You deny that Russia interefered in our election through their illegal hackings?

Can you document one single voter that changed their mind about voting for Hillary because her own words and those of her cronies were released to the public?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

All our intel agencies say so. You want them to expose their sources and methods because you trust the Kremlin more than our own government?

Translation: I have no evidence whatsoever. The best I can do is whine and squeal.

 

[Dawg]

I don't confirm or deny until I see proof one way or the other. A pity your standard is even lower than that. LOL

Bugsy is the Toxic part of DNC and why they losing they have discovered

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-seethe-after-georgia-loss-‘our-brand-is-worse-than-trump’/ar-BBCZnbn?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

No I don't think the hacking had an effect on votes cast. I think Hillary's campaigns response to the hacking had an effect.

For example, when North Korea hacked SONY pictures because they made a film making fun of the dear leader, you did not hear SONY executives when asked about the information that was released to the public start babbling incoherently about North Korea. They addressed the information, apologized to those that may have been offended.

Clinton's campaign? When asked about the information revealed would start babbling incoherently about the Russians. The most famous one of these instances, Donna Brazille was asked about leaking questions from CNN to the Clinton's during the primaries? Did she state it was a mistake? Did she state that I got carried away in my support for Hillary Clinton and I apologize to the Sanders campaign etc.?..........

Nope, she babbled incoherently about being a persecuted woman.............

People notice these things and they either did not show up or they voted for Trump.
Clinton lost because she was a terrible candidate and ran a campaign that befitted a terrible candidate. Any attempt to say otherwise is just pure unadulterated bullshit designed from a party that can deal with losing.

It's truly bizarre to blame the negative effect of the hackings on Hillary's vote count on Hillary, but you acknowledge that the hackings had an effect on the race.

So, you're correct for the wrong reason.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Can you document one single voter that changed their mind about voting for Hillary because her own words and those of her cronies were released to the public?

You know my rule - he who dodgeth gets no answer to his question.

And you dodgeth.

;-)

 

[Sickofleft]

It's truly bizarre to blame the negative effect of the hackings on Hillary's vote count on Hillary, but you acknowledge that the hackings had an effect on the race.

So, you're correct for the wrong reason.

You don't get it, perhaps find someone to explain it to you.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Translation: I have no evidence whatsoever. The best I can do is whine and squeal.

Re-translation: Yep. We need to deny the Russian interference to boost Trump and the Kremlin, so we demand that our intel agencies reveal their sources and methods, which we know they can't do. Patriots annoy the hell out of us.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

You don't get it, perhaps find someone to explain it to you.

Oh, I got it alright. You admitted that the Russian interference affected our election, in your typically bizarre way.

 

[marvin martian]

You know my rule - he who dodgeth gets no answer to his question.

And you dodgeth.

;-)

Creative dodge, I'll give you that. But clearly obvious you still have no proof. Keep hacking, Welshy!

 

[Sickofleft]

Oh, I got it alright. You admitted that the Russian interference affected our election, in your typically bizarre way.

Did you work for Clinton's campaign? The reason I ask is that you babble incoherently about the Russians just as they did and have since losing.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Creative dodge, I'll give you that. But clearly obvious you still have no proof. Keep hacking, Welshy!

I don't have the proof. I have the sworn word of our nation's intel services. I believe them over the denials of Putin and Trump. You choose to disbelieve them and side with Putin and Trump. You must, to advance your cultism.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Did you work for Clinton's campaign? The reason I ask is that you babble incoherently about the Russians just as they did and have since losing.

There's nothing incoherent about my noting your admission.