Read the indictmentInteresting. Can you point me to the passage in that article that illustrates how exactly they know Katenberg = Lukashev? I can't seem to find it in there.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download
Read the indictmentInteresting. Can you point me to the passage in that article that illustrates how exactly they know Katenberg = Lukashev? I can't seem to find it in there.
Patriots now the go to word for liberalismSo basically it comes down to patriots believing America and America's allies
and
Traitors taking the side of Trump, Putin and the Russians
I miss anything?
I read it. Twice all the way through. The Podesta/DNC parts about a half dozen times. Nowhere in there does it explain how they decided Katenberg is Lukashev. Not. One. Word.Read the indictment
https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download
"Serve their country" is MAGA talk for worship Traitor Trump ...Patriots now the go to word for liberalism
yet, few serve their country
We don't worship Men, you're confused"Serve their country" is MAGA talk for worship Traitor Trump ...
Most humans don't worship men like MAGA Nation worships Benedict Donald
We don't worship Men,..
Yet you voted for the guy who asked America's enemy for help and got it that nightyou're confused
You libs sure worshiped Sow
Do you have a point? I can't figure out how or why they associated Lukashev with the hacking is an issue. If it actually mattered, I'd look into it. So far it doesn't.I read it. Twice all the way through. The Podesta/DNC parts about a half dozen times. Nowhere in there does it explain how they decided Katenberg is Lukashev. Not. One. Word.
Sounds like he’s on the Russian’s defense team.Do you have a point? I can't figure out how or why they associated Lukashev with the hacking is an issue. If it actually mattered, I'd look into it. So far it doesn't.
Yep...there is a lot more at work here besides American Politics...Simply cannot be coincidence. He flat out said it appears to be an attempt to "put pressure" on Trump to not make nice with Putin on Monday. This is a guy who has worked in the White House, and is not exactly a right wing "conspiracy theorist." He is speaking from an informed position on this matter. And what he is clearly alluding to is that there is, in fact, a deep state - that (obviously) feels powerful enough to push the President around.
Once upon a Time Obama defended Putin.Sounds like he’s on the Russian’s defense team.
Once upon a time, Republicans defended America.
The Russians hacked the USA every day when Obama was president. They even compromised both the white house and pentagonAs you well know, the only evidence of which we’re aware is in the indictment. I suggest you read it. The actual underlying evidence consists of some of the most complex, technical cybersleuthing our law enforcement community has ever engaged in. I’m sure you and your fellow Putin/Trump defenders will demand the disclosure of all the sensitive sources and methods that allow us to track such crimes.
And it was over a year ago that our nation’s intel agencies unanimously concluded that the Kremlin was behind the illegal hackings and their fake news campaigns. I know your compulsive need to defend Putin will lead you to take Putin’s word, but patriots have no problem concluding that the Kremlin did it, and that they did it to get Trump elected.
Once upon a time wingers addressed topics and did not seek to derail discussions of their cult leaders with inapposite noise.Once upon a Time Obama defended Putin.
And we should do everything we can to punish Russia for its crimes against us, right?The Russians hacked the USA every day when Obama was president. They even compromised both the white house and pentagon
Should we punish ourselves 10 times as much as Russia, because we hack them 10 times as much as they hack usAnd we should do everything we can to punish Russia for its crimes against us, right?
Your dodge is noted, as always.Should we punish ourselves 10 times as much as Russia, because we hack them 10 times as much as they hack us
No dodge, the USA has interfered in 80 elections, and the nsa/cia are hacking Russia and China right now, so how can the USA indict Russians for hacking without indicting the nsa as wellYour dodge is noted, as always.
Simply deplorable.
Sifting through your evasion attempts, your answer to my question seems to be that we should do nothing to punish Russia for its criminal cyberattack against the 2016 election, right?No dodge, the USA has interfered in 80 elections, and the nsa/cia are hacking Russia and China right now, so how can the USA indict Russians for hacking without indicting the nsa as well
until you came along and do what you whine of others doingOnce upon a time wingers addressed topics and did not seek to derail discussions of their cult leaders with inapposite noise.
Why did Obama not punish China and Russia for attacking the Pentagon and white house?Sifting through your evasion attempts, your answer to my question seems to be that we should do nothing to punish Russia for its criminal cyberattack against the 2016 election, right?