Facts are subject to analysis, interpretation, and application. Thus, there is argument.
An intelligent Creator hasn't been proven a lie, and cannot be, any more than it can be proven a truth. As stated, current scientific facts indicate it to be truth. One may be ignorant of these facts or may choose to not recognize them; they remain facts, regardless.
Science is, indeed, a process; it seeks an understanding of the nature of things. The facts it discovers along the way may change or be discarded as the process advances. A scientific fact doesn't terminate scientific inquiry. Rather, it guides further inquiry.
Have you a photo of energy? No, for that's impossible, much as is a photo of God. You may have a photo of the results that energy produces. The results are what makes energy a fact. Ditto God.
I see no reason why it would be removed. It doesn't violate any forum guidlines as far as I can tell.
I contested the evidence you presented re: the existence of an intelligent Creator and others contested different points you presented. You disagree with what was said and, rather than advance the discussion, have declared it all to be invalid. The weakest argument so far is yours, Sir.
I'm religious and I addressed directly the issue as presented.
I'm sure that no one questions your good intentions. I, for one, welcome your efforts.
There is no argument to primary fact, their is either recognition of it or ignorance towards fact.
Secondary facts, such as one day the fact is the law is one way, legislation passes and the fact is the law is different.
Primary fact: it takes energy matter and time to re create energy and matter.
No opinion, analysis, interpretation, and application will ever change primary fact.
Truth is the garbage that crumbles when pit vs fact every single time. You ignore fact (you like every other religious person on the planet fail to provide one factual example of anything going poof into existence out of nothingness which is all that need be provided to prove the possibility of anything with intelligence could ever be the creator of everything to prove what I am sharing is not fact a all but you never will) because you have no validity.
Science s a process that determines recognition of fact once recognized as a fact, no longer a science.
Example, harnessing electricity became a successful formula therefor no longer a science but a successful formula that factually works, not just theory but actual fact.
What to do with the electricity, how to generate electricity. Coal plants creating electricity became a successful formula thus no longer a mere scientific theory, it became fact that coal plants could generate electricity. Creating the light bulb, once created no longer scientific theory, but fact.
Photos of energy can be found everywhere take the ocean of which waves are proof of energy or there would quite obviously not be waves. A photo of an animal running or flying or eating is a photo with evidence of energy ... I could go on and on. You taking a photo is evidence of energy. You writing a response is evidence of energy ... Take a picture of the sun but I advise you not look at the sun directly. Take a picture of lightning.
You didn't contest anything, you evaded facing fact and desperately scrambled to try and make irrelevant drivel the issue while lying to me because that is what religion teaches you to do.