Why in the hell would I read Harry Potter books?
Grade Reading Level
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone /
Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone 880L 5-6
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 940L 5-6
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 880L 5-6
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 880L 5-6
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix 950L 5-7
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince 1030L 6-8
http://www.life-after-harry-potter.com/hpbooks.html
"But can we equate popularity and passion with quality? Phil Nel voices the sentiment of many when he asserts, “Rowling is gifted at inventing a carefully imagined parallel universe, great at creating character, and a skilled crafter of plots.” On the other hand, Jeffrey Canton compares the series to other works of fantasy and finds it lacking in craft.
“Every time I read Alice in Wonderland, I am astounded by Carroll’s text — that’s what I don’t find in Rowling — some fabulous moments but overall — it’s a great son et lumiere show but that’s all it is.”
His voice is echoed by others who find the book to be entertaining but not especially compelling. According to Richard Flynn, the quality of the prose falls off precipitously after book one. Melynda Huskey suggests that as Rowling moves into young-adult territory she over-reaches, and the operatic, grandiose scale she is aiming for in the later books just falls flat. Some point out distractingly bad patches of writing. Stylistic elements such as “all those adverbial dialogue tags” and the overuse of capitals and exclamation points to express emotion detract from the reading pleasure of some. But the most commonly cited flaw was the tedious length of the later books, some of which could have easily been 100 pages shorter."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/college-inc/post/is-harry-potter-classic-childrens-literature/2011/07/16/gIQA0RS1HI_blog.html?utm_term=.df00764c11b6