Thurmond filibustered both the 1957 and the 1964 Civil Rights bills.
Keep trying. Your defense of Thurmond is very entertaining.
HIgh School textbook calls Trump racist and mentally unstable!!!
- Thread starter make speed limit 45
- Start date
Keep trying. Your defense of Thurmond is very entertaining.
Nostra
Governor
More Democrats voted AGAINST IT too. Simple numbers.
A higher percentage of Republicans in both the House and Senate voted for it.
That means a higher percentage of Racist Dimwingers voted against it.
So sad you can't prove me wrong, but continue to believe the fake shit you've been told.
As I said before....percentages don't mean shit. The fact is that there were few republicans in the South, but all of their reps voted against. So the racists who voted for all those democrats now vote for republicans.
redtide
Mayor
impossible to prove a negative which is why you always present them
You made the claim that FDR bought votes. I asked for proof. You have none.
I gave you the popular vote and Electoral college results for the election of 1932 and 1936 proving that FDR won in a landslide.
What negative do you think I'm challenging you to prove?
Nostra
Governor
Sure they don't....when they prove you are the racist party.
make speed limit 45
Mayor
And don't forget Ralph Northam whom the dems let stay on as gov of virginia despite wearing a KKK uniform,!!!
Ten Republicans and 87 Democrats. Proves our point.
The NAACP endorses plenty of racist Democrats. And those Democrats keep stabbing them in the back.
It actually proves mine. Now, instead of 10, there are over 100. The largely racist voters in the south changed parties after the 1964 vote.
To a halloween party....
Prove it. Prove there are now 100+ demonstrable racist Republicans in Congress. You are repeating an SPLC lie that has been thoroughly debunked, numerous times.
Yeah, that's proof.
EatTheRich
President
Sure, but that’s opportunism for you. The strategy is that racist Democrats are seen as a lesser evil compared to more racist Republicans.
Did you happen to see this story? It seems that AI routines that identify white supremacist Twitter accounts keep inadvertently picking up Republican politicians.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/motherboard.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/a3xgq5/why-wont-twitter-treat-white-supremacy-like-isis-because-it-would-mean-banning-some-republican-politicians-too
So in the early 60s the racists in the South elected mostly democrats. That vote by those racist southerners switched to republicans. Explain that. The evidence is that there were 10 republicans in the house in 1964, now there are over 100.
and the dems voted against civil rights in 64
You were a republican in the 60's
Ok, let's go with percentages.
The original House version:
- Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
- Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
- Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
- Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)
- Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texasvoted in favor)
- Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
- Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginiavoted against)
- Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
100% of Southern republicans voted against.
The original House version:
- Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
- Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
- Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
- Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)
- Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texasvoted in favor)
- Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
- Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginiavoted against)
- Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
100% of Southern republicans voted against.