New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

How Small of a Minority could Win the Electoral College?

Spamature

President
damn I wish they would put the spelling rating back, it was made just for you!
You want your peanut picking icon back. Nope, no automation for you.

You will have to get your hands dirty, lil fella.

upload_2019-7-9_20-21-30.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Mick

The Right is always right
The United States was founded by “we the people,” not by state governments. The representatives of the people chose to adopt a ratification procedure based on approvals from state legislatures (as they chose to do other things like create an Electoral College, constrained as they were by powerful special interests), but they had no obligation to do so.

Giving all states equal voice in the Senate was a concession to bring the Union together. Fact. I'm not sure what you are trying to say here other than to make yourself look dumb.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Other states have higher per capita homeless rates.
Like Hawaii, New York, Oregon and other left wing blue shitholes? Are you trying to make liberals look bad? You must, fool

Our supplemental poverty rate has to do with having more $1 million homes than any state.
It has nothing to do with million dollar homes because the people owning the million dollar homes aren't the ones in poverty. It has do with the fact a large portion of the population can't meet the needs for basic living. These are left wing hell holes.

California is a payer state. The real welfare abuse is having to pay for taker red states.
"California" pays nothing. Individuals and corporations pay taxes. California has the largest number of 1 percenters and thus THESE people pay more in federal income tax. The state doesn't pay a penny. These wealthy people skew Republican....as they do in all states. Republicans in this country pay more taxes than Democrats....and Democrats chew up more welfare benefits than Republicans from laziness. Approximately 1/3 of this country's entire welfare receiving population lives in California. It's the welfare capital of the country. And this population is 90% Democrat.

Red states receive no higher per capita amount of federal dollars than blue states. Red states DO run SMALLER budgets and therefore the federal funds they DO receive make up a larger percentage of their budgets. Simple math for even the lowest left wing IQ, right?


California has a $21 billion revenue surplus.
Jesus Christ, with their outrageously high state income tax I'd hope they would for once run a surplus. Congratulations, twit. So their trillion dollar deficit went to down 0.9999 trillion? LMFAO.

Most of the feces in this state is fertilizer for the largest in the nation agriculture sector. Today's Western World starts in our Silicon Valley.
And much of the HUMAN feces is all over the streets:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/Diseased-Streets-472430013.html

Conditions in much of San Francisco, Los Angeles, etc. is equal to the worst slums in the world. Shameful for a state with that many natural resources. Democrats have destroyed it. 3rd world shithole. Literally, a shithole.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
You would just rather their votes not count or be counted as less valuable in Ca ?

That is chicanery.
The EC was created and exists for sound reasons. Your idea would be an attempt to subvert the constitution -- and to do so dishonestly. The votes of Californians count as the constitutions mandates they be counted, same as for every other state. If one wants to have the constitution amended to change the way presidents are chosen, that's a legitimate conversation to have. If one wants to subvert it's clear intent via devious and dishonest means, one displays a weak, dishonest, arrogant, and amoral character.
 

Spamature

President
Like Hawaii, New York, Oregon and other left wing blue shitholes? Are you trying to make liberals look bad?
You sure are nasty when you're admitting you are wrong.




It has nothing to do with million dollar homes because the people owning the million dollar homes aren't the ones in poverty. It has do with the fact a large portion of the population can't meet the needs for basic living. These are left wing hell holes.
It has to do with what people pay to live here. Million dollar homes was an example of that cost. You could also translate that into housing cost of all kinds. People simply have to pay more to live in the greatest state in the union.


"California" pays nothing. Individuals and corporations pay taxes. California has the largest number of 1 percenters and thus THESE people pay more in federal income tax. The state doesn't pay a penny. These wealthy people skew Republican....as they do in all states.
THE PEOPLE of California. Going full retard with this bogus bit of disassembling does not change the fact.




Republicans in this country pay more taxes than Democrats....and Democrats chew up more welfare benefits than Republicans from laziness. Approximately 1/3 of this country's entire welfare receiving population lives in California. It's the welfare capital of the country. And this population is 90% Democrat. Red states receive no higher per capita amount of federal dollars than blue states. Red states DO run SMALLER budgets and therefore the federal funds they DO receive make up a larger percentage of their budgets. Simple math for even the lowest left wing IQ, right?
Yet it's THE PEOPLE of California making up for the shortfalls in those budgets for red state hillbillies and wastrels while they pay for their own as well.
Is that simple enough for your tiny mind ?




Jesus Christ, with their outrageously high state income tax I'd hope they would for once run a surplus. Congratulations, twit. So their trillion dollar deficit went to down 0.9999 trillion? LMFAO.
Only a slightly better reaction after having your ass handed to you.

Good boy.



And much of the HUMAN feces is all over the streets:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/Diseased-Streets-472430013.html

Conditions in much of San Francisco, Los Angeles, etc. is equal to the worst slums in the world. Shameful for a state with that many natural resources. Democrats have destroyed it. 3rd world shithole. Literally, a shithole.
Well nobody said that California was immune to the red state drug epidemic spreading our way. Those red state spread the disease of opiate addiction to places where it didn't belong. No doubt many red staters have chosen slow suicide rather than their 3rd world surroundings. After all not many Californians live out in the woods where they can shit along side the animals like they do in the red states.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
The EC was created and exists for sound reasons. Your idea would be an attempt to subvert the constitution -- and to do so dishonestly. The votes of Californians count as the constitutions mandates they be counted, same as for every other state. If one wants to have the constitution amended to change the way presidents are chosen, that's a legitimate conversation to have. If one wants to subvert it's clear intent via devious and dishonest means, one displays a weak, dishonest, arrogant, and amoral character.
The EC does not work today as it was designed. Those changes were not made by the normal process of an amendment to the constitution.

Look back on the original design and see if the current implementation is actually conforming to a "clear intent" as stated in the original design.

The constitution does state, quite clearly, that the states may select their electors as they see fit. The current Popular Vote effort would be in compliance.
 

Spamature

President
The EC was created and exists for sound reasons. Your idea would be an attempt to subvert the constitution -- and to do so dishonestly. The votes of Californians count as the constitutions mandates they be counted, same as for every other state. If one wants to have the constitution amended to change the way presidents are chosen, that's a legitimate conversation to have. If one wants to subvert it's clear intent via devious and dishonest means, one displays a weak, dishonest, arrogant, and amoral character.
They aren't Californians. They are Americans. Just because the move to a red state for the opportunity to work at a "voting center" should not be held against them. Nor should the fact that they work their voting center via telecommuting while working in Ca as well shouldn't be held against them either.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You can claim it's the manifestations of Mano himself, your opinion is worthless to me. it's still the best way to keep elections fair for everyone.
Only if you think it is fair to count the votes in Rhode Island as 4 times more valuable than the votes in Colorado.
 
Top