I can feel it coming... in the air tonight...

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Ask me something relevant

You're honesty is in question fake vet that makes it relevant.

Which post did you address those facts in?

Or are you going to keep lying?

everything has been debunked

Nope. The plea deal was separate, as was the sentencing in his two different trials.

How about instead of running around with your tail between your legs you address these facts directly.

"In Count One of the government’s superseding criminal information, Manafort pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States in connection with his failure to register under FARA as an agent of the government of Ukraine; that country’s Party of Regions; former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych; and the Opposition Bloc, a successor to Yanukovych’s Party of Regions. In the same count, Manafort also pleaded guilty to conspiracy in connection with FARA-related false statements and misrepresentations to the Department of Justice in violation of both FARA and the general false-statements statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1001."
https://www.lawfareblog.com/paul-ma...d-enforcement-foreign-agents-registration-act

Debunked

 

[FakeName]

You're honesty is in question fake vet that makes it relevant.

everything has been debunked


Debunked

The record is clear, you haven't debunked the proof I provided you.

You won't even address it.

Your balls and your honor are not in question. You don't seem to have either.

 

[FakeName]

You're honesty is in question fake vet that makes it relevant.

I don't care if you think I am honest. It is irelevant.

I provided you proof.

Deal with the proof.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

I don't care if you think I am honest. It is irelevant.

I provided you proof.

Deal with the proof.

You provided nothing no proof I showed you how long his sentencing was for.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

The record is clear, you haven't debunked the proof I provided you.

You won't even address it.

Your balls and your honor are not in question. You don't seem to have either.

Talk about not having honor and claiming to be a vet without p[roof makes you doubly dishonorable.
Yes, the record is clear you're a whinny little bitch who hates being proven wrong.

 

[FakeName]

You provided nothing no proof I showed you how long his sentencing was for.

Oh my God guy, the issue isn't how long his sentence was for. The issue is that he plead guilty to the exact same charge that Craig was indicted on. I proved that beyond any doubt.

 

[FakeName]

Talk about not having honor and claiming to be a vet without p[roof makes you doubly dishonorable.
Yes, the record is clear you're a whinny little bitch who hates being proven wrong.

Trying to change the subject?

Figures.

The record is indeed clear, you have not even addressed the proof that Manafort plead guilty to the same exact thing Craig is charged with.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Trying to change the subject?

Figures.

The record is indeed clear, you have not even addressed the proof that Manafort plead guilty to the same exact thing Craig is charged with.

Nope just pointing out your flaws

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Oh my God guy, the issue isn't how long his sentence was for. The issue is that he plead guilty to the exact same charge that Craig was indicted on. I proved that beyond any doubt.

The issue is what he was sentenced for

 

[EatTheRich]

The issue is what he was sentenced for

Namely, the same thing Craig was sentenced for (among other things).

 

[FakeName]

The issue is what he was sentenced for

Nope.

This whole conversation is about you saying that Craig was indicted for collusion and me proving to you that Manafort plead guilty to the exact same thing Craig is indicted for.

That is a fact. I proved it.

You can weasel around until the cows come home but it doesn't change anything.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Nope.

This whole conversation is about you saying that Craig was indicted for collusion and me proving to you that Manafort plead guilty to the exact same thing Craig is indicted for.

That is a fact. I proved it.

You can weasel around until the cows come home but it doesn't change anything.

WTF is wrong with you? Yes, the issue and only issue is what he was sentenced for. THAT PROVES YOU WRONG If he had pled guilty that would have been part of his total sentencing which I provided without a doubt.

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Namely, the same thing Craig was sentenced for (among other things).

that wasn't part of his sentencing

 

[FakeName]

WTF is wrong with you? Yes, the issue and only issue is what he was sentenced for. THAT PROVES YOU WRONG If he had pled guilty that would have been part of his total sentencing which I provided without a doubt.

He had two separate trials and a separate plea DEAL . In the plea deal he plead guilty to the identical charge Craig is indicted on.

That is a fact. I showed you proof.

You keep citing his convictions in his trials and saying that refutes the plea deal .....it is amazingly ignorant.

You should be totally embarrassed.

 

[FakeName]

that wasn't part of his sentencing

Because it was a plea deal and not part of either of his two trials.

Sheesh, I feel like a special Ed teacher.