well it's hard to argue that obamacare is either currently active or ineffective since it's not fully implemented or had a chance to bankrupt us or ration care yet. though both are inevitable.
Inevitable? How is bankruptcy inevitable? And since when have we NOT rationed care?
why don't you get me the metric by which 'jobs saved' is calculated.
Um by sending accountants out to the states where the grants were being spent and looking specifically at which jobs were funded by the additional spending.
and degs evidently satisfied with record unemployment.
Its nowhere near "record unemployment".
nothing says 'success' like people becoming so frustrated they just stop looking
a
In every downturn some people "stop looking" by either going back to school or retiring early. Again This is nothing unique or new to Obama
now these aren't exactly policies but the white house's unilaterally overturning the clinton administrations welfare reform
Never took place. Try again.
-
and unilaterally imposing temporary amnesty for criminal aliens while ignoring it's constitutional obligation to defend our borders,
No such Constitutional obligation, nor is the immigration issue a threat to our borders. Add in that Article II Section 2 OF THE CONSTITITON explicitly gives POTUS "the power to grant reprieves for Offenses against the United States" and you don't have much of a case here.
What you really are whining about is that the GOP Congress thought that if it simply refused to cooperate in any sort of productive negotiations with The POTUS that somehow this would prevent Obama's authority as Executive. While it does hamstring the WH ability to act, it does not stop it. And in its temper tantrum, the Congress has basically painted itself into the lowest approval ratings in history and handed Obama on a silver platter, the ability to act unilaterally.
You don't like that becaues your views are in the minorty and are outplayed. sucks.
standing idly by while iran goes nuclear doesn't thrill me.
As opposed to? (BTW how is it "standing idly" to have mroe effective alingment on this with the PRC and Russia than under GWB? or is that StuxNet was just nothing)
.. nor does a half assed effort in afghanistan
-
Again any factual evidence of this being "half-assed" Or is it just more political spin by someone who hated Obama since before he was the nominee?
mostly though I think the divider-in-chief annoys me the most by setting groups of americans against each other..
Really? Obama Set latinos against??? perhaps those seeking to deny then "No taxation without representation"?
As for House Budget Chairmen acting in good faith? Where? I see ZERO evidence of Ryan acting in "good faith". Particularly since many of the claims in his budget leave out well known but inconvenient facts.
So off the top of your head you've listed a bunch of factually unsupportable opinion, some of which is contradicted by demonstrable facts. That's the very defintiion of bigotry.