Mick
The Right is always right
Address the facts above and you will have answered your OWN questionSo tell us why you think any of that matters?
Address the facts above and you will have answered your OWN questionSo tell us why you think any of that matters?
Why do you think even any of that matters?Address the facts above and you will have answered your OWN question
Facts ALWAYS matter. Lies do not. See where this is at now?Why do you think even any of that matters?
You know what a red herring is?Facts ALWAYS matter.
Witness credibility is a "red herring" when it comes to his own statements and accusations?You know what a red herring is?
I agree with that statement.Witness credibility is a "red herring"
As if the whistle blower's attorney is in power.Bumper stickers? If you want to talk about the rabble, fascists were howling at the moon and Trump currently has the record for the most death threats.
I was talking about people in power. The rank and file can say whatever they want.
Sorry you needed that explained to you.
Trump released a version of the conversation that agrees with the witness....credibility is firmly established.Witness credibility is a "red herring" when it comes to his own statements and accusations?
Apparently, you need help realizing what "red herring" is.
ROFL
We already know he's dishonest. We have the transcript to tell us that. The focus on Carimella is to determine why he was dishonest, aside from being a democrat.The assault on Carimella is very obviously intended to both damage his reputation by implying he is dishonest and should be treated as a spy and traitor as well as telling anyone else who might come forward with information that hurts Trump that they'd better be prepared for the retaliation that will occur.
The Bush administration strove to do exactly that when Joe Wilson came out with his Op-Ed about his trip to Niger in answer to Bush's claim that Iraq was trying to get yellowcake from them. They went after his wife, Valerie Plame. Seems to be a trend among republican administrations.
What did the whistle blower say that was different from the version Trump released?We already know he's dishonest. We have the transcript to tell us that. The focus on Carimella is to determine why he was dishonest, aside from being a democrat.
Maybe you should compare both and get back to me, since we've only been discussing it on this board for 2 weeks now.What did the whistle blower say that was different from the version Trump released?
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/26/764071379/read-house-intel-releases-whistleblower-complaint-on-trump-ukraine-call
You said the Whistle Blower was dishonest. I've given you what the text of the complaint was, since you clearly didn't know. You made an allegation. Prove it.Maybe you should compare both and get back to me, since we've only been discussing it on this board for 2 weeks now.
Clearly you do not know what the WB complaint said. The "transcript" upheld all that the WB related in his complaint. One of Rudy's pals admitted to telling the incoming Ukrainian president about the quid pro quo before he was sworn in...Yeah, that's right. Lie, cheat, steal, attempt to kill your neighborhood. But just trust his criminal accusations against him now without question! What kind of low IQ dunce are you?
The WB said he threatened to withhold aid on the phone call. We have the transcript and that didn't happen. In fact, Zelensky didn't know for at least month afterwards. The WB filed a false complaint based upon that alone. His credibility is definitely in question. Mentally diseased lefties: "Please don't question this or compare it to the transcript...just take our word for it!" ROFL
He said he knowledge something occurred. That makes him a fact WITNESS. Jesus Christ, you can't even make a cogent argument. Between lies and a low left wing IQ nothing you type makes any reasonable sense on this forum.
Get lost, chump, unless you can form an argument by using facts.
Trump has his supporters shouting "Read the transcript" at rallies, yet the transcript confirms Trump was bribing/extorting Ukraine.Clearly you do not know what the WB complaint said. The "transcript" upheld all that the WB related in his complaint. One of Rudy's pals admitted to telling the incoming Ukrainian president about the quid pro quo before he was sworn in...
The WB related what numerous participants in the call told him, nothing more.