It wasn't until the advent of the Internet that I ever heard this term "
straw man" and logically, it's only used when the person using it has no legitimate argument. There is a difference between analogies and making up scenarios. In the instant case:
You make up excuses for black people with all manner of hogwash and when someone draws a realistic analogy, you're crying straw man. My example would be Holland. The white people there are surrounded by water... nothing but water. Holland is a land literally beat back from the sea. Those people had no geographic advantage.
Fifty paragraphs of your bloviating and puffery cannot change the bottom line. Here is an example of YOUR straw man argument:
"What evidence do you have suggesting the likelihood that areas not explored by Europeans prior to the 14th century or sometimes as late as the 19th century were populated by anyone other than Blacks?"
As soon as I give you the answer to that, you are going to be all over them, challenging their competency, etc. You will have to attack them rather than study them. You are promoting racism, not understanding so you have to win. You will have to challenge my sources, but for chit and giggles, I'll give you some references for material to study:
http://www.librarything.com/author/capteraymond
Pick a few Capt titles and good luck.